Closing the narrative gap: social media as a tool to reconcile institutional archival narratives with Indigenous counter-narratives

IF 1.3 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
R. Barrowcliffe
{"title":"Closing the narrative gap: social media as a tool to reconcile institutional archival narratives with Indigenous counter-narratives","authors":"R. Barrowcliffe","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2021.1883074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Archives are an integral component in the formation of a nation’s historical narratives. They are both repositories and sources of a nation’s evidence of events. Institutional archives have been striving to incorporate equity and social justice for Indigenous peoples but their practice is still heavily skewed to colonists’ perspectives. In this article, the author uses critical race theory to examine the social media narratives of Australia’s institutional archives during National Reconciliation Week, coinciding with the 2020 Black Lives Matter uprising. She uses the concept of counter-narrative to demonstrate the gaps between narratives about Indigenous peoples and those by Indigenous peoples in contemporary archival narratives as portrayed in social media. She argues that to truly achieve equity and social justice for Indigenous peoples, archives must engage with Indigenous counter-narratives in their collecting and exhibiting practices and bring the institutional and Indigenous narratives closer together.","PeriodicalId":43371,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Manuscripts","volume":"49 1","pages":"151 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2021.1883074","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives and Manuscripts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2021.1883074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Archives are an integral component in the formation of a nation’s historical narratives. They are both repositories and sources of a nation’s evidence of events. Institutional archives have been striving to incorporate equity and social justice for Indigenous peoples but their practice is still heavily skewed to colonists’ perspectives. In this article, the author uses critical race theory to examine the social media narratives of Australia’s institutional archives during National Reconciliation Week, coinciding with the 2020 Black Lives Matter uprising. She uses the concept of counter-narrative to demonstrate the gaps between narratives about Indigenous peoples and those by Indigenous peoples in contemporary archival narratives as portrayed in social media. She argues that to truly achieve equity and social justice for Indigenous peoples, archives must engage with Indigenous counter-narratives in their collecting and exhibiting practices and bring the institutional and Indigenous narratives closer together.
缩小叙事差距:社交媒体作为调和机构档案叙事与土著反叙事的工具
摘要档案是一个国家历史叙事形成过程中不可或缺的组成部分。它们既是一个国家事件证据的储存库,也是来源。机构档案一直在努力纳入土著人民的公平和社会正义,但他们的做法仍然严重偏向于殖民者的观点。在这篇文章中,作者使用批判性种族理论来研究澳大利亚国家和解周期间机构档案的社交媒体叙事,该周恰逢2020年“黑人的命也是命”起义。她使用反叙事的概念来展示社交媒体上描绘的当代档案叙事中关于土著人民的叙事与土著人民的叙述之间的差距。她认为,为了真正实现土著人民的公平和社会正义,档案馆必须在收集和展示实践中与土著反叙事接触,并将制度叙事和土著叙事紧密结合在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives and Manuscripts
Archives and Manuscripts INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信