No delay in care of ambulatory orthopaedic fractures observed during the early Coronavirus-2019 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
David Martin, Corey Bindner, John Dawson, Scott J Mitchell, Christopher H. Perkins, Omar H. Atassi
{"title":"No delay in care of ambulatory orthopaedic fractures observed during the early Coronavirus-2019 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"David Martin, Corey Bindner, John Dawson, Scott J Mitchell, Christopher H. Perkins, Omar H. Atassi","doi":"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of social distancing orders on ambulatory orthopaedic fracture care at a level 1 trauma center during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: All ambulatory orthopaedic fractures that presented to the author’s Level 1 trauma center were analyzed retrospectively between December 2019 and June 2020. Patients were divided into prepandemic (n=377) and pandemic (n=224) groups based on the date of presentation. Primary outcomes included new ambulatory fracture volume, and time to presentation and surgery. Secondary outcomes included fracture type and clinic no-show rates. Results: In the first 8 wk after the pandemic began, there was a 60.8% decrease in new patients with ambulatory fractures (24.6/week pre-pandemic, 9.63/week during the first 8 wk, P=0.001). The presentation rate of patients with new ambulatory fractures returned to the prepandemic baseline after the first 8 wk of the pandemic. No significant difference in time to presentation or surgery was noted between groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the presentation rate of the most commonly treated fracture types (ankle, distal radius, hand, or foot) between groups. There was a statistically significant increase in overall clinic no-show rate during the pandemic period. Conclusions: An initial decrease in ambulatory fracture volume was seen during the first 8 wk of the COVID-19 pandemic. No delay in time to presentation or time to surgery was seen between groups. After the first 8 wk of the pandemic, a return to normal ambulatory fracture volume was seen. Level of Evidence: Level III.","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"33 1","pages":"514 - 518"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of social distancing orders on ambulatory orthopaedic fracture care at a level 1 trauma center during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: All ambulatory orthopaedic fractures that presented to the author’s Level 1 trauma center were analyzed retrospectively between December 2019 and June 2020. Patients were divided into prepandemic (n=377) and pandemic (n=224) groups based on the date of presentation. Primary outcomes included new ambulatory fracture volume, and time to presentation and surgery. Secondary outcomes included fracture type and clinic no-show rates. Results: In the first 8 wk after the pandemic began, there was a 60.8% decrease in new patients with ambulatory fractures (24.6/week pre-pandemic, 9.63/week during the first 8 wk, P=0.001). The presentation rate of patients with new ambulatory fractures returned to the prepandemic baseline after the first 8 wk of the pandemic. No significant difference in time to presentation or surgery was noted between groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the presentation rate of the most commonly treated fracture types (ankle, distal radius, hand, or foot) between groups. There was a statistically significant increase in overall clinic no-show rate during the pandemic period. Conclusions: An initial decrease in ambulatory fracture volume was seen during the first 8 wk of the COVID-19 pandemic. No delay in time to presentation or time to surgery was seen between groups. After the first 8 wk of the pandemic, a return to normal ambulatory fracture volume was seen. Level of Evidence: Level III.
2019冠状病毒大流行早期观察到的门诊骨科骨折护理无延迟:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:本研究的目的是评估2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行期间社交距离令对一级创伤中心门诊骨科骨折护理的影响。方法:回顾性分析2019年12月至2020年6月期间提交给作者一级创伤中心的所有门诊骨科骨折。根据发病日期,患者被分为大流行病前组(n=377)和大流行病组(n=224)。主要结果包括新的动态骨折体积、出现和手术的时间。次要结果包括骨折类型和临床无显示率。结果:在大流行开始后的前8周,新的活动性骨折患者减少了60.8%(大流行前24.6周,前8周9.63周,P=0.001)。新的活动骨折患者的出现率在大流行前8周后恢复到大流行前的基线。两组之间在表现或手术时间上没有显著差异。两组之间最常见的骨折类型(脚踝、桡骨远端、手或脚)的出现率没有统计学上的显著差异。在疫情期间,总体临床未就诊率在统计上显著增加。结论:在新冠肺炎大流行的前8周,活动性骨折体积首次下降。在两组之间,没有发现出现时间延迟或手术时间延迟。在新冠疫情的前8周后,可见活动骨折体积恢复正常。证据级别:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信