At the front of the front-line: Ontario paramedics' experiences of occupational safety, risk and communication during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Allyson Oliphant, Cathy Faulds, Samara Bengall, E. Nouvet
{"title":"At the front of the front-line: Ontario paramedics' experiences of occupational safety, risk and communication during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Allyson Oliphant, Cathy Faulds, Samara Bengall, E. Nouvet","doi":"10.1108/ijes-07-2021-0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe study aimed to (1) determine on what bases paramedics in this context have defined themselves as feeling safe or at risk while serving on the front lines and (2) develop recommendations to support paramedics in their critical public health emergency response role.Design/methodology/approachThis qualitative study consisted of 21 semi-structured interviews with primary care paramedics (PCPs), advanced care paramedics (ACPs) and critical care paramedics (CCPs) with first-hand experience responding to the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario. Qualitative research is best suited to the research objectives of gaining detailed and nuanced understandings of paramedics' experiences during this public health emergency, and identifying in paramedics' accounts what changes to policy and practice might strengthen their sense of safety in future infectious disease outbreaks (Bowling, 2002; Chafe, 2017). Data collection occurred over the course of 3.5 months, from June 2020 until September 2020.FindingsParticipants described several factors that heightened their feeling exposed to risk particular to working on the front lines of the COVID-19 public health response. These factors include stress connected to personal protective equipment (PPE) and equipment access, risks of infection to self and family, communications and feelings of being systematically under-considered. Recommendations from this research include, but are not limited to, ensuring a more equitable distribution of protective equipment to paramedics across unevenly funded services, and recognizing paramedics face unique and additional stressors in public health emergencies.Research limitations/implicationsA key limitation of this study was the relatively small sample, with 50% of potential participants deciding not to engage in an interview. The authors suspect this is likely a result of timing, as this was conducting during significant periods of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario. The study identifies and begins to shed light on the way in which feelings of compromised safety and specific stressors in a public health emergency context connect to one another and potentially increase risks of burnout for this healthcare provider group. This study's documentation of paramedics feeling uncertainty about their own and their family's safety, combined with feeling occupational pressure, decisional pressure within constrained frameworks of care delivery, a lack of autonomy and a lack of consideration within their healthcare system in general and within its pandemic response in particular, is important in and of itself. These stressors can have serious implications for the ability of paramedics to sustain their integral role in public health emergency response.Practical implicationsA series of pandemic-specific and generalizable recommendations emerged from this research and in collaboration with community-based medical leadership. (1) Consult paramedics on effectiveness of screening questions and equipment. Be sure to illicit and respond to paramedic feedback in a timely manner. (2) Implement operational changes during pandemics in the form of donning and doffing stations, disposable gowns, decontamination teams at hospitals, infectious disease paramedic (IDP) truck, anti-fog sprays for goggles, and safe and controlled areas for eating and taking breaks. (3) Develop an emergency pandemic plan that is resourced and maintained as part of EMS strategic planning. Involve EMS in decisions related to health system emergency planning and sustainability of EMS practice. (4) Establish equitable distribution of resources, such as ensuring PPE is distributed equitably and applying pandemic pay equally to all essential workers. (5) Validate and respect EMS, as they are essential workers. Recognize the expertise of paramedics and community healthcare providers. Finally, an overarching recommendation at the core of this research is the consideration for paramedic knowledge as expertise given their role as critical front line healthcare specialists and the protection of this crucial human resource as it relates to their resilience and mental wellbeing.Social implicationsEvidence-based awareness and improved understanding of paramedic stress during the pandemic is a first step to developing strategies to reduce that stress. This is essential in ensuring access to this essential service during emergencies and the safety of the communities they serve.Originality/valueFindings from this study can inform development of supports to sustain paramedic wellbeing during public health emergencies, during the ongoing pandemic, in Ontario and beyond.","PeriodicalId":44087,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijes-07-2021-0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThe study aimed to (1) determine on what bases paramedics in this context have defined themselves as feeling safe or at risk while serving on the front lines and (2) develop recommendations to support paramedics in their critical public health emergency response role.Design/methodology/approachThis qualitative study consisted of 21 semi-structured interviews with primary care paramedics (PCPs), advanced care paramedics (ACPs) and critical care paramedics (CCPs) with first-hand experience responding to the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario. Qualitative research is best suited to the research objectives of gaining detailed and nuanced understandings of paramedics' experiences during this public health emergency, and identifying in paramedics' accounts what changes to policy and practice might strengthen their sense of safety in future infectious disease outbreaks (Bowling, 2002; Chafe, 2017). Data collection occurred over the course of 3.5 months, from June 2020 until September 2020.FindingsParticipants described several factors that heightened their feeling exposed to risk particular to working on the front lines of the COVID-19 public health response. These factors include stress connected to personal protective equipment (PPE) and equipment access, risks of infection to self and family, communications and feelings of being systematically under-considered. Recommendations from this research include, but are not limited to, ensuring a more equitable distribution of protective equipment to paramedics across unevenly funded services, and recognizing paramedics face unique and additional stressors in public health emergencies.Research limitations/implicationsA key limitation of this study was the relatively small sample, with 50% of potential participants deciding not to engage in an interview. The authors suspect this is likely a result of timing, as this was conducting during significant periods of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario. The study identifies and begins to shed light on the way in which feelings of compromised safety and specific stressors in a public health emergency context connect to one another and potentially increase risks of burnout for this healthcare provider group. This study's documentation of paramedics feeling uncertainty about their own and their family's safety, combined with feeling occupational pressure, decisional pressure within constrained frameworks of care delivery, a lack of autonomy and a lack of consideration within their healthcare system in general and within its pandemic response in particular, is important in and of itself. These stressors can have serious implications for the ability of paramedics to sustain their integral role in public health emergency response.Practical implicationsA series of pandemic-specific and generalizable recommendations emerged from this research and in collaboration with community-based medical leadership. (1) Consult paramedics on effectiveness of screening questions and equipment. Be sure to illicit and respond to paramedic feedback in a timely manner. (2) Implement operational changes during pandemics in the form of donning and doffing stations, disposable gowns, decontamination teams at hospitals, infectious disease paramedic (IDP) truck, anti-fog sprays for goggles, and safe and controlled areas for eating and taking breaks. (3) Develop an emergency pandemic plan that is resourced and maintained as part of EMS strategic planning. Involve EMS in decisions related to health system emergency planning and sustainability of EMS practice. (4) Establish equitable distribution of resources, such as ensuring PPE is distributed equitably and applying pandemic pay equally to all essential workers. (5) Validate and respect EMS, as they are essential workers. Recognize the expertise of paramedics and community healthcare providers. Finally, an overarching recommendation at the core of this research is the consideration for paramedic knowledge as expertise given their role as critical front line healthcare specialists and the protection of this crucial human resource as it relates to their resilience and mental wellbeing.Social implicationsEvidence-based awareness and improved understanding of paramedic stress during the pandemic is a first step to developing strategies to reduce that stress. This is essential in ensuring access to this essential service during emergencies and the safety of the communities they serve.Originality/valueFindings from this study can inform development of supports to sustain paramedic wellbeing during public health emergencies, during the ongoing pandemic, in Ontario and beyond.
在前线:安大略省护理人员在2020年COVID-19大流行期间的职业安全、风险和沟通经验
目的:本研究旨在(1)确定在这种情况下护理人员在前线服务时是基于什么基础定义自己感到安全或处于危险之中;(2)提出建议,以支持护理人员发挥关键的公共卫生应急反应作用。本定性研究包括21次半结构化访谈,访谈对象包括初级护理护理人员(pcp)、高级护理护理人员(acp)和重症护理护理人员(ccp),他们具有应对安大略省COVID-19大流行的第一手经验。定性研究最适合于研究目标,即在这次突发公共卫生事件中获得对护理人员经验的详细和细致的理解,并在护理人员的叙述中确定政策和实践的哪些变化可能会增强他们在未来传染病爆发中的安全感(Bowling, 2002;摩擦,2017)。从2020年6月到2020年9月,数据收集时间为3.5个月。参与者描述了几个因素,这些因素加剧了他们对风险的感受,特别是在COVID-19公共卫生应对的前线工作。这些因素包括与个人防护装备和设备获取相关的压力、对自己和家人的感染风险、沟通以及被系统地忽视的感觉。本研究的建议包括但不限于确保在资金不均衡的服务中更公平地向护理人员分配防护装备,并认识到护理人员在突发公共卫生事件中面临独特和额外的压力源。研究局限性/启示本研究的一个关键局限性是样本相对较小,50%的潜在参与者决定不参加面试。作者怀疑这可能是时间的结果,因为这是在安大略省COVID-19大流行的重要时期进行的。该研究确定并开始阐明在公共卫生紧急情况下,安全受损的感觉和特定压力源相互联系的方式,并可能增加这一医疗保健提供者群体的倦怠风险。本研究记录了护理人员对自己和家人的安全感到不确定的情况,并结合了职业压力、医疗服务受限框架内的决策压力、缺乏自主权和医疗保健系统总体上缺乏考虑,特别是在其大流行应对中,这本身就很重要。这些压力源可能对护理人员在公共卫生应急反应中维持其不可或缺作用的能力产生严重影响。在与社区医疗领导的合作下,这项研究提出了一系列针对大流行病的可推广的建议。(1)就筛查问题和设备的有效性咨询护理人员。一定要对医护人员的反馈及时做出回应。(2)在大流行期间实施操作变革,包括设立穿衣和脱衣站、一次性工作服、医院消毒小组、传染病护理人员(IDP)卡车、护目镜防雾喷雾器,以及安全可控的用餐和休息区域。(3)制定一项流行病应急计划,作为EMS战略规划的一部分提供资源并加以维护。让EMS参与与卫生系统应急计划和EMS实践可持续性相关的决策。(4)实现资源的公平分配,例如确保个人防护装备的公平分配,并对所有基本工作人员平等发放大流行工资。(5)确认并尊重EMS,因为他们是必不可少的员工。认可护理人员和社区医疗保健提供者的专业知识。最后,本研究的核心建议是考虑护理人员知识作为专业知识,因为他们作为关键一线医疗保健专家的作用,并保护这一重要的人力资源,因为它关系到他们的弹性和心理健康。社会影响基于证据的认识和改进对大流行期间护理人员压力的了解是制定减轻这种压力战略的第一步。这对于确保在紧急情况下获得这项基本服务及其所服务社区的安全至关重要。独创性/价值本研究的发现可以为安大略省及其他地区在突发公共卫生事件期间、正在进行的大流行期间维持护理人员福祉的支持提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Emergency Services
International Journal of Emergency Services SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信