Prevalence of MLSB Phenotypes of Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a tertiary care hospital of Delhi

IF 0.2 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Malika Grover, N. Goyal, Seema Gangar, N. Singh
{"title":"Prevalence of MLSB Phenotypes of Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a tertiary care hospital of Delhi","authors":"Malika Grover, N. Goyal, Seema Gangar, N. Singh","doi":"10.4081/hls.2023.11229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Against the backdrop of the ever-changing Staphylococcal resistance pattern, clindamycin remains a viable therapeutic alternative Variation of Clindamycin drug resistance patterns with geographic area make inducible clindamycin resistance testing imperative for all staphylococcal isolates to avoid therapeutic failure. This was a prospective study conducted over a period of 1.5 years from January 2021 until June 2022. Prevalence of different MLSB Phenotypes of Staphylococcus aureus isolates was determined by standard disc diffusion method as per CLSI guidelines. Pyogenic samples received in the Microbiology lab that yielded Staphylococcus aureus were further tested for the presence of clindamycin resistance by disc diffusion method. Out of 6586 total pyogenic and respiratory specimens received in the lab, Staphylococcus aureus was yielded in 752 samples. On further testing for the MLSB phenotypes, 16.3% isolates were found to be iMLSB, 19.28% were cMLSB, 43.1% were of MSB type. ICR screening will reduce the unessential subjection of the patient to the antibiotic, and would prevent unnecessary adverse effects in the patients.","PeriodicalId":30412,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare in Lowresource Settings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare in Lowresource Settings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/hls.2023.11229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the ever-changing Staphylococcal resistance pattern, clindamycin remains a viable therapeutic alternative Variation of Clindamycin drug resistance patterns with geographic area make inducible clindamycin resistance testing imperative for all staphylococcal isolates to avoid therapeutic failure. This was a prospective study conducted over a period of 1.5 years from January 2021 until June 2022. Prevalence of different MLSB Phenotypes of Staphylococcus aureus isolates was determined by standard disc diffusion method as per CLSI guidelines. Pyogenic samples received in the Microbiology lab that yielded Staphylococcus aureus were further tested for the presence of clindamycin resistance by disc diffusion method. Out of 6586 total pyogenic and respiratory specimens received in the lab, Staphylococcus aureus was yielded in 752 samples. On further testing for the MLSB phenotypes, 16.3% isolates were found to be iMLSB, 19.28% were cMLSB, 43.1% were of MSB type. ICR screening will reduce the unessential subjection of the patient to the antibiotic, and would prevent unnecessary adverse effects in the patients.
德里一家三级护理医院分离的金黄色葡萄球菌MLSB表型的患病率
在葡萄球菌耐药性模式不断变化的背景下,克林霉素仍然是一种可行的治疗替代品。克林霉素耐药性模式随地理区域的变化使得所有葡萄球菌分离株都必须进行诱导型克林霉素耐药性检测,以避免治疗失败。这是一项前瞻性研究,从2021年1月到2022年6月,历时1.5年。根据CLSI指南,采用标准纸片扩散法测定金黄色葡萄球菌分离株不同MLSB表型的患病率。微生物实验室收到的产生金黄色葡萄球菌的致脓样品通过圆盘扩散法进一步检测是否存在克林霉素耐药性。在实验室收到的6586份化脓性和呼吸道样本中,752份样本中产生了金黄色葡萄球菌。进一步检测MLSB表型,发现16.3%的分离株为iMLSB,19.28%为cMLSB,43.1%为MSB型。ICR筛查将减少患者对抗生素的非必要接触,并防止患者出现不必要的不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信