The complex conundrum of geriatric depression and dementias: Revisiting the clinical ambiguity

S. Mukhopadhyay, D. Banerjee
{"title":"The complex conundrum of geriatric depression and dementias: Revisiting the clinical ambiguity","authors":"S. Mukhopadhyay, D. Banerjee","doi":"10.4103/jgmh.jgmh_21_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Late-life depression (LLD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia are clinically distinct yet interrelated disease constructs, wherein LLD can be a prodrome, risk factor, comorbidity, or consequence of MCI and dementia. There is considerable prevalence of depression in those with MCI or dementia, and vice versa, with maximum evidence in Alzheimer's disease. These intersections often form one of the most confusing aspects of psychogeriatric practice, leading to under-detection and mismanagement of depression, thus leading to incomplete recovery in most cases. This article focuses on this clinical ambiguity in daily practice, reviews the clinico-investigative pointers for the LLD–dementia intersection, and puts forward clinical and research recommendations in view of the available evidence. Although there is conflicting evidence regarding the cause–effect relationship between LLD, MCI, and dementia, it is likely that these constructs share some common pathological processes and are often associated with each other within a longitudinal clinical continuum. This is a linear yet complex bidirectional association: either the comorbid depression exaggerates preexisting cognitive deficits or chronic persistent depression eventually leads to major neurocognitive disorders, not to mention depression as a part of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, which often impairs quality of life and psychosocial morbidity. Thus, a comprehensive approach, including tailored history, neuropsychiatric examination, and relevant investigations, is necessary for assessing the differentials, with a sound clinical understanding being vital to the process. Depression, if suspected, must be treated adequately with longitudinal neuropsychological reviews. Future research warrants elucidating precision biomarkers unique to these clinicopathological entities.","PeriodicalId":16009,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Mental Health","volume":"8 1","pages":"93 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jgmh.jgmh_21_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Late-life depression (LLD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia are clinically distinct yet interrelated disease constructs, wherein LLD can be a prodrome, risk factor, comorbidity, or consequence of MCI and dementia. There is considerable prevalence of depression in those with MCI or dementia, and vice versa, with maximum evidence in Alzheimer's disease. These intersections often form one of the most confusing aspects of psychogeriatric practice, leading to under-detection and mismanagement of depression, thus leading to incomplete recovery in most cases. This article focuses on this clinical ambiguity in daily practice, reviews the clinico-investigative pointers for the LLD–dementia intersection, and puts forward clinical and research recommendations in view of the available evidence. Although there is conflicting evidence regarding the cause–effect relationship between LLD, MCI, and dementia, it is likely that these constructs share some common pathological processes and are often associated with each other within a longitudinal clinical continuum. This is a linear yet complex bidirectional association: either the comorbid depression exaggerates preexisting cognitive deficits or chronic persistent depression eventually leads to major neurocognitive disorders, not to mention depression as a part of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, which often impairs quality of life and psychosocial morbidity. Thus, a comprehensive approach, including tailored history, neuropsychiatric examination, and relevant investigations, is necessary for assessing the differentials, with a sound clinical understanding being vital to the process. Depression, if suspected, must be treated adequately with longitudinal neuropsychological reviews. Future research warrants elucidating precision biomarkers unique to these clinicopathological entities.
老年抑郁症和痴呆症的复杂难题:重新审视临床歧义
晚期抑郁症(LLD)、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆症是临床上不同但相互关联的疾病结构,其中LLD可能是MCI和痴呆症的前驱症状、风险因素、共病或后果。MCI或痴呆症患者的抑郁症患病率相当高,反之亦然,阿尔茨海默病的发病率最高。这些交叉点往往是老年心理医学实践中最令人困惑的方面之一,导致抑郁症的发现不足和管理不善,从而在大多数情况下导致不完全康复。本文重点讨论了日常实践中的这种临床模糊性,回顾了LLD-痴呆交叉点的临床研究指标,并根据现有证据提出了临床和研究建议。尽管关于LLD、MCI和痴呆之间的因果关系有相互矛盾的证据,但这些结构可能有一些共同的病理过程,并且在纵向临床连续体中经常相互关联。这是一种线性但复杂的双向关联:要么是合并症抑郁症夸大了先前存在的认知缺陷,要么是慢性持续性抑郁症最终导致严重的神经认知障碍,更不用说抑郁症是痴呆症行为和心理症状的一部分,这往往会损害生活质量和心理社会发病率。因此,评估差异需要一种全面的方法,包括量身定制的病史、神经精神检查和相关调查,而良好的临床理解对这一过程至关重要。如果怀疑抑郁症,必须通过纵向神经心理学检查进行充分治疗。未来的研究需要阐明这些临床病理实体特有的精确生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信