Efficiency and safety of video-assisted mediastinal lymphadenectomy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Q4 Medicine
A. Skorokhod, A. Petrov, A. Kozak, M. Atyukov, A. Nefedov, P. Yаblonskiy
{"title":"Efficiency and safety of video-assisted mediastinal lymphadenectomy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer","authors":"A. Skorokhod, A. Petrov, A. Kozak, M. Atyukov, A. Nefedov, P. Yаblonskiy","doi":"10.24884/0042-4625-2020-179-6-24-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION. A number of studies demonstrate the advantage of bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy in surgery of non-small cell lung cancer (nSCLC). For surgical approach to the opposite mediastinum for many years there were proposed sternotomy, video-thoracoscopy, and transcervical video-assisted interventions. In our practice, we use videoassisted mediastinal lymphadenectomy (VAMLA).The OBJECTIVE was to learn the efficiency and safety of VAMLA in surgery of NSCLC.METHODS AND MATERIALS. The study included the materials of examination and treatment of 102 patients with NSCLC. 102 patients were divided into 2 groups. In the 1st group (54 patients), VAMLA and lung resection were performed. In the 2nd group (48 patients): anatomical lung resection and systematic ipsilateral lymphadenectomy (SLD) were performed.RESULTS. The average number of remote lymph node stations in group 1 was (7.8±1.7); in group 2 – (4.5±1.2) (p<0.05). The average number of lymph nodes was 26±8.6 compared to (14.3±6) in both groups, respectively (p<0.05). «Occult» pN2-N3 metastasis was detected in 20 % (7/34) of patients of the group 1 and 6.5 % (2/31) of patients of the group 2 (p<0.05). The level of postoperative complications in both groups was 33.4 vs. 29.2 %, respectively (p>0.05). The duration of the postoperative day ((12.7±4.9) vs. (13.7±6.5)) and the duration of pleural drainage ((5.5±4.2) vs. (5.8±4.4)) did not differ in both groups (p>0.05).CONCLUSION. VAMLA is an effective and safe method for evaluating the pN stage of NSCLC. Performing VAMLA in left-sided NSCLC allows removing significantly more lymph nodes and stations in comparison with SLD available in VATS and thoracotomy, which increases the accuracy of postoperative N-staging. The use of the VAMLA in minimally invasive surgery of right-sided NSCLC may be promising in cases of high risk of «occult» pN3 lesion, but requires further study of the role of contralateral lymphatic dissection.","PeriodicalId":23485,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik khirurgii imeni I. I. Grekova","volume":"179 1","pages":"24-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik khirurgii imeni I. I. Grekova","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2020-179-6-24-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. A number of studies demonstrate the advantage of bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy in surgery of non-small cell lung cancer (nSCLC). For surgical approach to the opposite mediastinum for many years there were proposed sternotomy, video-thoracoscopy, and transcervical video-assisted interventions. In our practice, we use videoassisted mediastinal lymphadenectomy (VAMLA).The OBJECTIVE was to learn the efficiency and safety of VAMLA in surgery of NSCLC.METHODS AND MATERIALS. The study included the materials of examination and treatment of 102 patients with NSCLC. 102 patients were divided into 2 groups. In the 1st group (54 patients), VAMLA and lung resection were performed. In the 2nd group (48 patients): anatomical lung resection and systematic ipsilateral lymphadenectomy (SLD) were performed.RESULTS. The average number of remote lymph node stations in group 1 was (7.8±1.7); in group 2 – (4.5±1.2) (p<0.05). The average number of lymph nodes was 26±8.6 compared to (14.3±6) in both groups, respectively (p<0.05). «Occult» pN2-N3 metastasis was detected in 20 % (7/34) of patients of the group 1 and 6.5 % (2/31) of patients of the group 2 (p<0.05). The level of postoperative complications in both groups was 33.4 vs. 29.2 %, respectively (p>0.05). The duration of the postoperative day ((12.7±4.9) vs. (13.7±6.5)) and the duration of pleural drainage ((5.5±4.2) vs. (5.8±4.4)) did not differ in both groups (p>0.05).CONCLUSION. VAMLA is an effective and safe method for evaluating the pN stage of NSCLC. Performing VAMLA in left-sided NSCLC allows removing significantly more lymph nodes and stations in comparison with SLD available in VATS and thoracotomy, which increases the accuracy of postoperative N-staging. The use of the VAMLA in minimally invasive surgery of right-sided NSCLC may be promising in cases of high risk of «occult» pN3 lesion, but requires further study of the role of contralateral lymphatic dissection.
电视辅助纵隔淋巴结清扫术治疗癌症非小细胞肺癌的有效性和安全性
介绍。许多研究表明双侧纵隔淋巴结切除术在非小细胞肺癌(nSCLC)手术中的优势。对于对纵隔的手术入路,多年来一直建议采用胸骨切开术、电视胸腔镜和经颈电视辅助干预。在我们的实践中,我们使用视频辅助纵隔淋巴结切除术(VAMLA)。目的:了解VAMLA在非小细胞肺癌手术中的有效性和安全性。方法和材料。本研究包括102例非小细胞肺癌患者的检查和治疗资料。102例患者分为两组。第一组(54例)行VAMLA +肺切除术。第二组(48例)行解剖性肺切除术和系统性同侧淋巴结切除术(SLD)。组1平均远端淋巴结站数为(7.8±1.7)个;2组为(4.5±1.2)(p0.05)。两组患者术后天数(12.7±4.9)比(13.7±6.5),胸腔引流时间(5.5±4.2)比(5.8±4.4),差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。VAMLA是评价NSCLC pN分期的一种有效、安全的方法。与VATS和开胸术中的SLD相比,在左侧NSCLC中进行VAMLA可以清除更多的淋巴结和淋巴结,从而提高了术后n分期的准确性。在“隐匿性”pN3病变高风险的病例中,使用VAMLA进行右侧NSCLC的微创手术可能是有希望的,但需要进一步研究对侧淋巴清扫的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信