LANSKAP ARKEOLOGI DALAM PERSPEKTIF PROSESUAL DAN PASCA-PROSESUAL: STUDI KASUS KOMPLEKS MEGALITIK DI DATARAN TINGGI JAMBI

Hafiful Hadi Sunliensyar
{"title":"LANSKAP ARKEOLOGI DALAM PERSPEKTIF PROSESUAL DAN PASCA-PROSESUAL: STUDI KASUS KOMPLEKS MEGALITIK DI DATARAN TINGGI JAMBI","authors":"Hafiful Hadi Sunliensyar","doi":"10.30883/JBA.V38I2.267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of archaeology paradigm from processual to postprocessual, influence the archaeologists thought about landscape. Sometimes, the landscape in archaeology is arduous understood because overlapping with other studies. Actually, this problem can be solved if we analyze the development of archaeology paradigm which associated with landscape study. This article attempts to discuss the ambiguity of landscape in archaeology with case study on the megalithic complex in Jambi Highland. Based on the data, it is known that: landscape in procesual study just explain the association between megalithic with burial-jars, mountains, settlements, and natural resources around it. The result which obtained in this perspective, was an explanation of megalithic function based on the relationship between sites and environment. Conversely in post-processual, attempts to interpret about megalithic complex in Jambi Higland based on individual (including researcher perception) or community perceptions. The result obtained in postprocessual, can answer questions about the unevenness of megalithic orientation and the difference of megalithic locations. \n ","PeriodicalId":52718,"journal":{"name":"Berkala Arkeologi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkala Arkeologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30883/JBA.V38I2.267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The development of archaeology paradigm from processual to postprocessual, influence the archaeologists thought about landscape. Sometimes, the landscape in archaeology is arduous understood because overlapping with other studies. Actually, this problem can be solved if we analyze the development of archaeology paradigm which associated with landscape study. This article attempts to discuss the ambiguity of landscape in archaeology with case study on the megalithic complex in Jambi Highland. Based on the data, it is known that: landscape in procesual study just explain the association between megalithic with burial-jars, mountains, settlements, and natural resources around it. The result which obtained in this perspective, was an explanation of megalithic function based on the relationship between sites and environment. Conversely in post-processual, attempts to interpret about megalithic complex in Jambi Higland based on individual (including researcher perception) or community perceptions. The result obtained in postprocessual, can answer questions about the unevenness of megalithic orientation and the difference of megalithic locations.  
程序中的考古学范畴与帕斯卡程序前景&研究政治综合体在高市场中的复杂运用
考古学范式从过程性到后过程性的发展,影响着考古学家对景观的思考。有时,考古学中的景观由于与其他研究的重叠而难以理解。实际上,如果我们分析与景观研究相关的考古学范式的发展,这个问题是可以解决的。本文试图以占碑高原巨石群为例,探讨考古学中景观的模糊性。根据这些数据,我们知道:过程研究中的景观只是解释了巨石与埋葬罐、山脉、聚落和周围自然资源之间的联系。从这一角度得到的结果是基于遗址与环境之间的关系来解释巨石的功能。相反,在后期处理中,试图根据个人(包括研究者的感知)或社区的感知来解释占碑高地的巨石复合体。在后处理中得到的结果,可以回答关于巨石取向不均匀和巨石位置差异的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信