How equity practices within universities facilitate women graduates' employability

IF 3.2 3区 管理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
G. Crimmins, Sarah Casey
{"title":"How equity practices within universities facilitate women graduates' employability","authors":"G. Crimmins, Sarah Casey","doi":"10.1108/et-02-2021-0064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper argues that universities can facilitate women graduates' employability by supporting gender equity within their institutions. It presents a rationale and strategy for addressing the gendered nature of career confidence which negatively impacts women graduates' entry into the workplace – a phenomenon that influences women graduates' career and life trajectories, and all industries' capacity to serve women stakeholders.Design/methodology/approachThe authors consider existing literature as “words to think with” (Kinsella and Shepherd, 2020), as a feminist methodology to contribute fresh ideas into the discourse arena of graduate employability and as a means to make social change possible (Phelan, 1994).FindingsThe paper presents the feminist viewpoint that a reconfiguration of gender relations in the academy, through deploying gender equity quotas, and professional development activities designed to expose and help mitigate implicit gender bias are required to support women graduates' career confidence and employability.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper offers a viewpoint rather than an empirical evidence because of the difficulty in directly assessing a causal relationship between gendered education experience and graduates' self-efficacy and transition from college to work, “due to its longitudinal nature … [and] because cultural beliefs are … difficult to manipulate experimentally” (Sterling et al., 2020, p. 30,306). Also, while gender equity quotas have had some success, they can be disrupted by gendered bias within the workplace. Although the authors recommend a combination intervention of gender equity quotas and professional development to address gender bias, they acknowledge that the intervention is yet to be evaluated.Practical implicationsUniversities are tasked with supporting graduate employability, an inherent quality of which is graduate identity. The study offers a practical solution to increasing the number of women leaders within the academy by recommending the introduction of gender equity quotas, supported by professional development designed to develop leaders' gender insight and change agency, and combat all university workers' gender bias. This approach provides more equitable work structures within universities and increases the number and nature of women role models to support women's graduate identity development. Gender equity principles are presented as the key to facilitating women graduates' self-efficacy and work readiness.Social implicationsStrategy designed to enhance women graduates' career confidence is critical because women's lower career confidence tends to inform their lower-level starting positions with lower-level pay, resulting in role and pay gaps that are sustained and magnified throughout the life cycle of their careers. Additionally, interventions to address gender bias in the academy are significant because providing gender equity quotas alongside facilitating women in leadership positions to be/come change agents move beyond what Cockburn (1989, p. 218) defines as supporting a short-term agenda of “equality for individual women … [to supporting a] project of transformation for organizations”.Originality/valueThe novel contribution of this paper is the feminist conceptualisation that gender equity practices, most notably a composite of gender equity quotas and professional development, are located within universities' remit to support graduate employability.","PeriodicalId":47994,"journal":{"name":"Education and Training","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/et-02-2021-0064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper argues that universities can facilitate women graduates' employability by supporting gender equity within their institutions. It presents a rationale and strategy for addressing the gendered nature of career confidence which negatively impacts women graduates' entry into the workplace – a phenomenon that influences women graduates' career and life trajectories, and all industries' capacity to serve women stakeholders.Design/methodology/approachThe authors consider existing literature as “words to think with” (Kinsella and Shepherd, 2020), as a feminist methodology to contribute fresh ideas into the discourse arena of graduate employability and as a means to make social change possible (Phelan, 1994).FindingsThe paper presents the feminist viewpoint that a reconfiguration of gender relations in the academy, through deploying gender equity quotas, and professional development activities designed to expose and help mitigate implicit gender bias are required to support women graduates' career confidence and employability.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper offers a viewpoint rather than an empirical evidence because of the difficulty in directly assessing a causal relationship between gendered education experience and graduates' self-efficacy and transition from college to work, “due to its longitudinal nature … [and] because cultural beliefs are … difficult to manipulate experimentally” (Sterling et al., 2020, p. 30,306). Also, while gender equity quotas have had some success, they can be disrupted by gendered bias within the workplace. Although the authors recommend a combination intervention of gender equity quotas and professional development to address gender bias, they acknowledge that the intervention is yet to be evaluated.Practical implicationsUniversities are tasked with supporting graduate employability, an inherent quality of which is graduate identity. The study offers a practical solution to increasing the number of women leaders within the academy by recommending the introduction of gender equity quotas, supported by professional development designed to develop leaders' gender insight and change agency, and combat all university workers' gender bias. This approach provides more equitable work structures within universities and increases the number and nature of women role models to support women's graduate identity development. Gender equity principles are presented as the key to facilitating women graduates' self-efficacy and work readiness.Social implicationsStrategy designed to enhance women graduates' career confidence is critical because women's lower career confidence tends to inform their lower-level starting positions with lower-level pay, resulting in role and pay gaps that are sustained and magnified throughout the life cycle of their careers. Additionally, interventions to address gender bias in the academy are significant because providing gender equity quotas alongside facilitating women in leadership positions to be/come change agents move beyond what Cockburn (1989, p. 218) defines as supporting a short-term agenda of “equality for individual women … [to supporting a] project of transformation for organizations”.Originality/valueThe novel contribution of this paper is the feminist conceptualisation that gender equity practices, most notably a composite of gender equity quotas and professional development, are located within universities' remit to support graduate employability.
大学内部的公平做法如何促进女性毕业生的就业能力
本文认为,大学可以通过支持其机构内的性别平等来促进女性毕业生的就业能力。它提出了解决职业信心的性别性质的基本原理和战略,因为职业信心对女毕业生进入工作场所产生负面影响,这种现象影响到女毕业生的职业和生活轨迹,也影响到所有行业为妇女利益相关者服务的能力。设计/方法/方法作者将现有文献视为“思考的词汇”(Kinsella and Shepherd, 2020),作为女权主义方法论,为毕业生就业能力的话语领域贡献新思想,并作为使社会变革成为可能的手段(Phelan, 1994)。研究结果:本文提出了女权主义的观点,即需要通过部署性别平等配额和旨在揭露和帮助减轻隐性性别偏见的专业发展活动来重新配置学院中的性别关系,以支持女性毕业生的职业信心和就业能力。研究局限/意义本文提供了一个观点,而不是一个经验证据,因为很难直接评估性别教育经历与毕业生自我效能感和从大学到工作的过渡之间的因果关系,“由于其纵向性质……[和]因为文化信仰……很难在实验上操纵”(Sterling et al., 2020, p. 30,306)。此外,虽然性别平等配额取得了一些成功,但它们可能会受到工作场所性别偏见的破坏。尽管作者建议将性别平等配额和专业发展结合起来进行干预,以解决性别偏见问题,但他们承认,这种干预还有待评估。实际意义大学的任务是支持毕业生的就业能力,这是毕业生身份的内在品质。该研究提供了一个切实可行的解决方案,通过建议引入性别平等配额,支持旨在培养领导者性别洞察力和改变机构的专业发展,并打击所有大学工作人员的性别偏见,来增加学院内女性领导者的数量。这种方法在大学内提供了更公平的工作结构,增加了妇女榜样的数量和性质,以支持妇女毕业生身份的发展。性别平等原则是促进女性毕业生自我效能感和工作准备的关键。旨在增强女毕业生职业自信的策略是至关重要的,因为女性较低的职业自信往往会导致她们较低的起始职位和较低的薪酬,从而导致角色和薪酬差距在整个职业生涯中持续和扩大。此外,解决学术界性别偏见的干预措施很重要,因为提供性别平等配额,同时促进女性在领导岗位上成为/成为变革推动者,这超出了Cockburn(1989,第218页)所定义的支持“个体女性平等……[支持]组织转型项目”的短期议程。原创性/价值本文的新颖贡献在于女权主义的概念,即性别平等实践,尤其是性别平等配额和专业发展的组合,位于大学的职权范围内,以支持毕业生的就业能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education and Training
Education and Training EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Education + Training addresses the increasingly complex relationships between education, training and employment and the impact of these relationships on national and global labour markets. The journal gives specific consideration to young people, looking at how the transition from school/college to employment is achieved and how the nature of partnerships between the worlds of education and work continues to evolve. The journal explores vocationalism in learning and efforts to address employability within the curriculum, together with coverage of innovative themes and initiatives within vocational education and training. The journal is read by policy makers, educators and academics working in a wide range of fields including education, learning and skills development, enterprise and entrepreneurship education and training, induction and career development. Coverage: Managing the transition from school/college to work New initiatives in post 16 vocational education and training Education-Business partnerships and collaboration Links between education and industry The graduate labour market Work experience and placements The recruitment, induction and development of school leavers and graduates Young person employability and career development E learning in further and higher education Research news Reviews of recent publications.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信