Assessment of Burned Areas during the Pantanal Fire Crisis in 2020 Using Sentinel-2 Images

IF 3 3区 农林科学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Y. Shimabukuro, G. de Oliveira, G. Pereira, E. Arai, F. Cardozo, A. C. Dutra, G. Mataveli
{"title":"Assessment of Burned Areas during the Pantanal Fire Crisis in 2020 Using Sentinel-2 Images","authors":"Y. Shimabukuro, G. de Oliveira, G. Pereira, E. Arai, F. Cardozo, A. C. Dutra, G. Mataveli","doi":"10.3390/fire6070277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Pantanal biome—a tropical wetland area—has been suffering a prolonged drought that started in 2019 and peaked in 2020. This favored the occurrence of natural disasters and led to the 2020 Pantanal fire crisis. The purpose of this work was to map the burned area’s extent during this crisis in the Brazilian portion of the Pantanal biome using Sentinel-2 MSI images. The classification of the burned areas was performed using a machine learning algorithm (Random Forest) in the Google Earth Engine platform. Input variables in the algorithm were the percentiles 10, 25, 50, 75, and 90 of monthly (July to December) mosaics of the shade fraction, NDVI, and NBR images derived from Sentinel-2 MSI images. The results showed an overall accuracy of 95.9% and an estimate of 44,998 km2 burned in the Brazilian portion of the Pantanal, which resulted in severe ecosystem destruction and biodiversity loss in this biome. The burned area estimated in this work was higher than those estimated by the MCD64A1 (35,837 km2), Fire_cci (36,017 km2), GABAM (14,307 km2), and MapBiomas Fogo (23,372 km2) burned area products, which presented lower accuracies. These differences can be explained by the distinct datasets and methods used to obtain those estimates. The proposed approach based on Sentinel-2 images can potentially refine the burned area’s estimation at a regional scale and, consequently, improve the estimate of trace gases and aerosols associated with biomass burning, where global biomass burning inventories are widely known for having biases at a regional scale. Our study brings to light the necessity of developing approaches that aim to improve data and theory about the impacts of fire in regions critically sensitive to climate change, such as the Pantanal, in order to improve Earth systems models that forecast wetland–atmosphere interactions, and the role of these fires on current and future climate change over these regions.","PeriodicalId":36395,"journal":{"name":"Fire-Switzerland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire-Switzerland","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6070277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Pantanal biome—a tropical wetland area—has been suffering a prolonged drought that started in 2019 and peaked in 2020. This favored the occurrence of natural disasters and led to the 2020 Pantanal fire crisis. The purpose of this work was to map the burned area’s extent during this crisis in the Brazilian portion of the Pantanal biome using Sentinel-2 MSI images. The classification of the burned areas was performed using a machine learning algorithm (Random Forest) in the Google Earth Engine platform. Input variables in the algorithm were the percentiles 10, 25, 50, 75, and 90 of monthly (July to December) mosaics of the shade fraction, NDVI, and NBR images derived from Sentinel-2 MSI images. The results showed an overall accuracy of 95.9% and an estimate of 44,998 km2 burned in the Brazilian portion of the Pantanal, which resulted in severe ecosystem destruction and biodiversity loss in this biome. The burned area estimated in this work was higher than those estimated by the MCD64A1 (35,837 km2), Fire_cci (36,017 km2), GABAM (14,307 km2), and MapBiomas Fogo (23,372 km2) burned area products, which presented lower accuracies. These differences can be explained by the distinct datasets and methods used to obtain those estimates. The proposed approach based on Sentinel-2 images can potentially refine the burned area’s estimation at a regional scale and, consequently, improve the estimate of trace gases and aerosols associated with biomass burning, where global biomass burning inventories are widely known for having biases at a regional scale. Our study brings to light the necessity of developing approaches that aim to improve data and theory about the impacts of fire in regions critically sensitive to climate change, such as the Pantanal, in order to improve Earth systems models that forecast wetland–atmosphere interactions, and the role of these fires on current and future climate change over these regions.
使用Sentinel-2图像评估2020年潘塔纳尔火灾危机期间的烧伤区域
潘塔纳尔生物群落是一个热带湿地地区,从2019年开始,到2020年达到顶峰,一直遭受长期干旱。这有利于自然灾害的发生,并导致了2020年潘塔纳尔火灾危机。这项工作的目的是利用Sentinel-2 MSI图像绘制潘塔纳尔生物群落巴西部分在这次危机期间被烧毁地区的范围。使用谷歌Earth Engine平台中的机器学习算法(Random Forest)对烧伤区域进行分类。算法的输入变量是Sentinel-2 MSI图像中阴影分数、NDVI和NBR图像每月(7月至12月)马赛克的百分位数10、25、50、75和90。结果表明,在潘塔纳尔河巴西部分,总体精度为95.9%,估计烧毁面积为44,998 km2,造成了严重的生态系统破坏和生物多样性丧失。与MCD64A1 (35,837 km2)、Fire_cci (36,017 km2)、GABAM (14,307 km2)和MapBiomas Fogo (23,372 km2)产品相比,本研究估算的燃烧面积更高,但精度较低。这些差异可以用不同的数据集和用于获得这些估计值的方法来解释。基于Sentinel-2图像提出的方法可能会在区域尺度上改进燃烧面积的估计,从而改进与生物质燃烧相关的痕量气体和气溶胶的估计,因为众所周知,全球生物质燃烧清单在区域尺度上存在偏差。我们的研究揭示了开发方法的必要性,这些方法旨在改善对气候变化非常敏感的地区(如潘塔纳尔)火灾影响的数据和理论,以改进预测湿地-大气相互作用的地球系统模型,以及这些火灾对这些地区当前和未来气候变化的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fire-Switzerland
Fire-Switzerland Multiple-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
15.60%
发文量
182
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信