Evaluation of Etomidate as an Intravenous Anesthetic Drug in Dogs: Using Midazolam and Methocarbamol in Premedication

Q4 Veterinary
M. Javdani, A. Hashemi, A. Bigham-Sadegh, Z. Nikousefat
{"title":"Evaluation of Etomidate as an Intravenous Anesthetic Drug in Dogs: Using Midazolam and Methocarbamol in Premedication","authors":"M. Javdani, A. Hashemi, A. Bigham-Sadegh, Z. Nikousefat","doi":"10.30500/IVSA.2020.225832.1213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective- The aim of this study was to evaluate etomidate as an injectable anesthetic in dogs and to use midazolam and methocarbamol in premedication.Design- Experimental Study.Animals- Fourteen native young female dogsProcedure- Dogs were randomly allocated to one of two groups to receive: midazolam (0.5 mg/kg; MiE group) or methocarbamol (20 mg/kg; MeE group) 5 minutes before etomidate (2 mg/kg) administered intravenously. In addition to recording anesthesia plan times, some physiological and hematobiochemical parameters were also measured at different times in the two groups. Results- It was found that there was no significant difference between the two groups at both induction and recovery time. Heart rate, respiratire rate, and rectal temperature changes in the MiE group were noticeably fluctuating, unlike the MeE group. There was a significant difference in the values of hematocrit, total protein, glucose, and cortisol between the two groups at some times. Significant increase in ALT and AST activity was observed in MeE group compared to MiE group at some times.Conclusion and clinical relevance- Intramuscular administration of methocarbamol such as midazolam prior to induction of anesthesia by etomidate in dogs, while providing similar anesthesia and recovery time, has minimal cardiopulmonary effects and hematobiochemical changes in dogs under anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":14554,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Veterinary Surgery","volume":"15 1","pages":"96-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30500/IVSA.2020.225832.1213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective- The aim of this study was to evaluate etomidate as an injectable anesthetic in dogs and to use midazolam and methocarbamol in premedication.Design- Experimental Study.Animals- Fourteen native young female dogsProcedure- Dogs were randomly allocated to one of two groups to receive: midazolam (0.5 mg/kg; MiE group) or methocarbamol (20 mg/kg; MeE group) 5 minutes before etomidate (2 mg/kg) administered intravenously. In addition to recording anesthesia plan times, some physiological and hematobiochemical parameters were also measured at different times in the two groups. Results- It was found that there was no significant difference between the two groups at both induction and recovery time. Heart rate, respiratire rate, and rectal temperature changes in the MiE group were noticeably fluctuating, unlike the MeE group. There was a significant difference in the values of hematocrit, total protein, glucose, and cortisol between the two groups at some times. Significant increase in ALT and AST activity was observed in MeE group compared to MiE group at some times.Conclusion and clinical relevance- Intramuscular administration of methocarbamol such as midazolam prior to induction of anesthesia by etomidate in dogs, while providing similar anesthesia and recovery time, has minimal cardiopulmonary effects and hematobiochemical changes in dogs under anesthesia.
依托咪酯作为犬静脉麻醉药物的评价:用药前使用咪达唑仑和甲氧苄醇
目的-本研究的目的是评估依托咪酯作为狗的注射麻醉剂,并在用药前使用咪达唑仑和甲氨基酚。设计-实验研究。实验方法:将14只本地年轻母狗随机分为两组:咪达唑仑(0.5 mg/kg;MiE组)或甲氨基酚(20 mg/kg;MeE组)静脉滴注依托咪酯(2mg /kg)前5分钟。在记录麻醉计划时间的同时,测量两组患者在不同时间的一些生理和血液生化参数。结果:两组在诱导和恢复时间上均无明显差异。与MeE组不同,MiE组的心率、呼吸频率和直肠温度变化明显波动。两组患者的红细胞压积、总蛋白、葡萄糖和皮质醇值在某些时间有显著差异。与MiE组相比,MeE组ALT和AST活性在某些时候显著升高。结论及临床意义——在依咪咪酯诱导犬麻醉前肌注咪达唑仑等甲氨苄胺,在提供相似的麻醉和恢复时间的同时,对麻醉犬的心肺作用和血液生化变化最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信