Paths Not Traveled: Genocide Prevention, the Global Grassroots, and the Power of Dialogism

Q3 Social Sciences
Elisa von Joeden-Forgey
{"title":"Paths Not Traveled: Genocide Prevention, the Global Grassroots, and the Power of Dialogism","authors":"Elisa von Joeden-Forgey","doi":"10.3138/gsi.2021.12.13.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Genocide prevention has been a field located in the Global North but preoccupied with the Global South. It is an elite field that is dominated by Western technical experts, many of whom have close ties to Western governments, and that is organized along vertical hierarchies. It works largely with states and militaries, and focuses a majority of its attention on military intervention into ongoing conflict as well as legal accountability after genocide has been committed. These priorities have had a dramatic impact on how genocide is defined and identified, preferencing the mass killing element of the crime and \"reducing genocide to law,\" as the legal scholar Payam Akhavan aptly put it in his 2012 book of that title. Although grassroots outreach is sometimes advocated, it is usually understood in terms of pressure politics and lobbying at the center of global power rather than as the empowerment of ordinary people worldwide as transformative and preventative agents in and of themselves. This article is both a call for critical self-examination of the field of genocide studies and a surfacing of paths not taken in the practice of genocide prevention.","PeriodicalId":40844,"journal":{"name":"Genocide Studies International","volume":"14 1","pages":"45 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genocide Studies International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/gsi.2021.12.13.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Genocide prevention has been a field located in the Global North but preoccupied with the Global South. It is an elite field that is dominated by Western technical experts, many of whom have close ties to Western governments, and that is organized along vertical hierarchies. It works largely with states and militaries, and focuses a majority of its attention on military intervention into ongoing conflict as well as legal accountability after genocide has been committed. These priorities have had a dramatic impact on how genocide is defined and identified, preferencing the mass killing element of the crime and "reducing genocide to law," as the legal scholar Payam Akhavan aptly put it in his 2012 book of that title. Although grassroots outreach is sometimes advocated, it is usually understood in terms of pressure politics and lobbying at the center of global power rather than as the empowerment of ordinary people worldwide as transformative and preventative agents in and of themselves. This article is both a call for critical self-examination of the field of genocide studies and a surfacing of paths not taken in the practice of genocide prevention.
未走过的路:种族灭绝预防、全球基层和对话的力量
摘要:种族灭绝预防一直是全球北方的一个领域,但却为全球南方所关注。这是一个精英领域,由西方技术专家主导,其中许多人与西方政府关系密切,并按照垂直等级组织起来。它主要与国家和军队合作,并将其大部分注意力集中在对持续冲突的军事干预以及种族灭绝行为发生后的法律问责上。这些优先事项对种族灭绝的定义和认定产生了巨大影响,如法律学者帕亚姆·阿哈万(Payam Akhavan)在其2012年的同名著作中恰当地指出的那样,这些优先事项倾向于将种族灭绝的罪行定义为大规模杀戮,并“将种族灭绝纳入法律”。虽然有时也提倡向基层推广,但人们通常将其理解为全球权力中心的压力政治和游说,而不是将其理解为赋予世界各地的普通人权力,让他们自己成为变革和预防的力量。这篇文章既是对种族灭绝研究领域进行批判性自我检查的呼吁,也是对预防种族灭绝实践中未采取的途径的揭示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genocide Studies International
Genocide Studies International POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信