Tsetse Flies: Comparative Morphometric Information from Traits Collected on Wings and Pupae

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
B. Ta, D. Kaba, D. Berté, V. Djohan, G. Acapovi-Yao, J. Rayaissé, E. Salou, P. Solano, J. Dujardin
{"title":"Tsetse Flies: Comparative Morphometric Information from Traits Collected on Wings and Pupae","authors":"B. Ta, D. Kaba, D. Berté, V. Djohan, G. Acapovi-Yao, J. Rayaissé, E. Salou, P. Solano, J. Dujardin","doi":"10.4001/003.029.0522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) are pupiparous insects that transmit African trypanosomes to humans and animals. Using three species of tsetse flies belonging to two subgenera, Nemorhina and Glossina, our data provide a first answer to the following question: do the juvenile stages of tsetse flies provide metric traits allowing reliable species and/or sex identification? We compared three species using their wings and their pupae: Glossina palpalis gambiensis, Glossina tachinoides and Glossina morsitans submorsitans. To separate size and shape information, 11 landmarks per wing were submitted to the Generalised Procrustes Analysis (GPA). The contour of the pupae was processed by elliptic Fourier analysis (EFA).A validated reclassification method was used to compare the taxonomic power of each organ, as well as its utility for sex recognition. The contour of the pupae did not provide a satisfactory species signal (75 %), relative to the one obtained from wing landmarks (99 %). However, the overall pupae size was much more satisfactory than the wings size (93 % versus 57 %). In spite of a lower taxonomic signal, the morphometric variation observed on pupae was in agreement with known phylogenetic relationships. Contrary to the wings, sexual dimorphism was much reduced in pupae and not strong enough to allow any reliable sex identification.","PeriodicalId":7566,"journal":{"name":"African Entomology","volume":"29 1","pages":"522 - 533"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4001/003.029.0522","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) are pupiparous insects that transmit African trypanosomes to humans and animals. Using three species of tsetse flies belonging to two subgenera, Nemorhina and Glossina, our data provide a first answer to the following question: do the juvenile stages of tsetse flies provide metric traits allowing reliable species and/or sex identification? We compared three species using their wings and their pupae: Glossina palpalis gambiensis, Glossina tachinoides and Glossina morsitans submorsitans. To separate size and shape information, 11 landmarks per wing were submitted to the Generalised Procrustes Analysis (GPA). The contour of the pupae was processed by elliptic Fourier analysis (EFA).A validated reclassification method was used to compare the taxonomic power of each organ, as well as its utility for sex recognition. The contour of the pupae did not provide a satisfactory species signal (75 %), relative to the one obtained from wing landmarks (99 %). However, the overall pupae size was much more satisfactory than the wings size (93 % versus 57 %). In spite of a lower taxonomic signal, the morphometric variation observed on pupae was in agreement with known phylogenetic relationships. Contrary to the wings, sexual dimorphism was much reduced in pupae and not strong enough to allow any reliable sex identification.
Tsetse蝇:翅膀和蛹特征的比较形态计量信息
Tsetse蝇(直翅目:舌蝇科)是一种将非洲锥虫传播给人类和动物的幼虫。使用属于Nemorhina和Glossina两个亚属的三种舌蝇,我们的数据为以下问题提供了第一个答案:舌蝇的幼年阶段是否提供了可靠的物种和/或性别识别的度量特征?我们用它们的翅膀和蛹对三个物种进行了比较:冈比亚触须舌苔、速舌苔和近摩舌苔。为了分离尺寸和形状信息,每个机翼有11个地标被提交给通用程序分析(GPA)。通过椭圆傅立叶分析(EFA)对蛹的轮廓进行处理。使用一种经过验证的重新分类方法来比较每个器官的分类能力及其在性别识别中的实用性。相对于从翅膀标志获得的信号(99%),蛹的轮廓没有提供令人满意的物种信号(75%)。然而,蛹的总体大小比翅膀的大小(93%对57%)更令人满意。尽管分类信号较低,但在蛹上观察到的形态计量学变异与已知的系统发育关系一致。与翅膀相反,蛹的两性异形大大减少,而且不足以进行任何可靠的性别鉴定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Entomology
African Entomology 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: African Entomology (ISSN 1021-3589 – print / 2224-8854 – online) replaced the old Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa in 1993. A single volume consisting of two issues (March and September) is published annually. The journal is indexed in all major abstracting journals African Entomology is a peer reviewed scientific journal that publishes original research articles and short communications on all aspects of entomology, with an emphasis on the advancement of entomology on the African continent.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书