Benjamin Avanzi, Mark Lavender, G. Taylor, Bernard Wong
{"title":"Detection and treatment of outliers for multivariate robust loss reserving","authors":"Benjamin Avanzi, Mark Lavender, G. Taylor, Bernard Wong","doi":"10.1017/s1748499523000155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Traditional techniques for calculating outstanding claim liabilities such as the chain-ladder are notoriously at risk of being distorted by outliers in past claims data. Unfortunately, the literature in robust methods of reserving is scant, with notable exceptions such as Verdonck & Debruyne (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 48, 85–98) and Verdonck & Van Wouwe (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,49, 188–193). In this paper, we put forward two alternative robust bivariate chain-ladder techniques to extend the approach of Verdonck & Van Wouwe (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,49, 188–193). The first technique is based on Adjusted Outlyingness (Hubert & Van der Veeken, 2008. Journal of Chemometrics,22, 235–246) and explicitly incorporates skewness into the analysis while providing a unique measure of outlyingness for each observation. The second technique is based on bagdistance (Hubert et al., 2016. Statistics: Methodology, 1–23) which is derived from the bagplot; however; it is able to provide a unique measure of outlyingness and a means to adjust outlying observations based on this measure.\n Furthermore, we extend our robust bivariate chain-ladder approach to an N-dimensional framework. The implementation of the methods, especially beyond bivariate, is not trivial. This is illustrated on a trivariate data set from Australian general insurers and results under the different outlier detection and treatment mechanisms are compared.","PeriodicalId":44135,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Actuarial Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Actuarial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1748499523000155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Traditional techniques for calculating outstanding claim liabilities such as the chain-ladder are notoriously at risk of being distorted by outliers in past claims data. Unfortunately, the literature in robust methods of reserving is scant, with notable exceptions such as Verdonck & Debruyne (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 48, 85–98) and Verdonck & Van Wouwe (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,49, 188–193). In this paper, we put forward two alternative robust bivariate chain-ladder techniques to extend the approach of Verdonck & Van Wouwe (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,49, 188–193). The first technique is based on Adjusted Outlyingness (Hubert & Van der Veeken, 2008. Journal of Chemometrics,22, 235–246) and explicitly incorporates skewness into the analysis while providing a unique measure of outlyingness for each observation. The second technique is based on bagdistance (Hubert et al., 2016. Statistics: Methodology, 1–23) which is derived from the bagplot; however; it is able to provide a unique measure of outlyingness and a means to adjust outlying observations based on this measure.
Furthermore, we extend our robust bivariate chain-ladder approach to an N-dimensional framework. The implementation of the methods, especially beyond bivariate, is not trivial. This is illustrated on a trivariate data set from Australian general insurers and results under the different outlier detection and treatment mechanisms are compared.
众所周知,计算未偿索赔负债的传统方法,如链梯法,存在被过去索赔数据中的异常值扭曲的风险。不幸的是,除了Verdonck & Debruyne (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 48, 85-98)和Verdonck & Van Wouwe (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,49, 188-193)等显著的例外,关于稳健储备方法的文献很少。在本文中,我们提出了两种可选的鲁棒二元链梯技术来扩展Verdonck和Van Wouwe (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,49, 188-193)的方法。第一种技术是基于调整的离群度(Hubert & Van der Veeken, 2008)。化学计量学杂志,22,235-246),并明确地将偏度纳入分析,同时为每个观察提供独特的离群度测量。第二种技术是基于包距(Hubert et al., 2016)。统计:方法,1-23),来源于袋图;然而;它能够提供一种独特的离群度度量和一种基于该度量调整离群观测值的方法。此外,我们将我们的鲁棒二元链梯方法扩展到n维框架。这些方法的实现,特别是超越二元变量的实现,不是微不足道的。这是由澳大利亚一般保险公司的三变量数据集说明的,并比较了不同异常值检测和治疗机制下的结果。