Changing Realities: China-Africa Infrastructure Development

IF 1.3
Asia Policy Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1353/asp.2022.0047
Mandira Bagwandeen
{"title":"Changing Realities: China-Africa Infrastructure Development","authors":"Mandira Bagwandeen","doi":"10.1353/asp.2022.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T hrough an extensive portfolio of infrastructure investments, China has played a crucial role in helping Africa reduce deficits in its infrastructure. Over the past decade and a half, Chinese state-owned or state-aligned construction and engineering companies have strategically entered African markets with assistance from the Chinese government. Under China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), Chinese companies took on mega-infrastructure projects, especially in the energy and transport sectors, that could aid African countries with achieving higher levels of development. However, these mega-BRI projects came with hefty price tags that have contributed to compounding the debt stress of several African nations. In this regard, many international (and especially Western) actors have accused China of predatory lending practices and debt-trap diplomacy. This narrative has been further amplified amid the Covid-19 pandemic, which has had significant ramifications for BRI projects in Africa and around the world. The pandemic has created some doubt about whether Chinese-funded and -built infrastructure projects can be completed and, more importantly, whether African states have the fiscal capacity to repay these development loans. With reduced revenues available to African governments, the risk of defaulting on loan repayments is high. Moreover, because of the burden of loan repayments, African states are handicapped in their response measures to Covid-19 and its economic consequences. The Eighth Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) in November 2021 demonstrated that due to changing realities—including China’s domestic economic concerns, U.S.-China trade tensions, the global economic impact of Covid-19, and Africa’s pandemic-induced debt stress—Beijing seems to have realized that it cannot continue to be Africa’s go-to bank for financing infrastructure development. This essay outlines that China may not be as willing as it was in past years to finance infrastructure development projects in Africa. It explores the impact of Covid-19 on the development of BRI infrastructure projects in Africa and briefly assesses the validity of the debt-trap and predatory lending accusations leveled against China. Additionally, the essay addresses","PeriodicalId":53442,"journal":{"name":"Asia Policy","volume":"29 1","pages":"18 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2022.0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

T hrough an extensive portfolio of infrastructure investments, China has played a crucial role in helping Africa reduce deficits in its infrastructure. Over the past decade and a half, Chinese state-owned or state-aligned construction and engineering companies have strategically entered African markets with assistance from the Chinese government. Under China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), Chinese companies took on mega-infrastructure projects, especially in the energy and transport sectors, that could aid African countries with achieving higher levels of development. However, these mega-BRI projects came with hefty price tags that have contributed to compounding the debt stress of several African nations. In this regard, many international (and especially Western) actors have accused China of predatory lending practices and debt-trap diplomacy. This narrative has been further amplified amid the Covid-19 pandemic, which has had significant ramifications for BRI projects in Africa and around the world. The pandemic has created some doubt about whether Chinese-funded and -built infrastructure projects can be completed and, more importantly, whether African states have the fiscal capacity to repay these development loans. With reduced revenues available to African governments, the risk of defaulting on loan repayments is high. Moreover, because of the burden of loan repayments, African states are handicapped in their response measures to Covid-19 and its economic consequences. The Eighth Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) in November 2021 demonstrated that due to changing realities—including China’s domestic economic concerns, U.S.-China trade tensions, the global economic impact of Covid-19, and Africa’s pandemic-induced debt stress—Beijing seems to have realized that it cannot continue to be Africa’s go-to bank for financing infrastructure development. This essay outlines that China may not be as willing as it was in past years to finance infrastructure development projects in Africa. It explores the impact of Covid-19 on the development of BRI infrastructure projects in Africa and briefly assesses the validity of the debt-trap and predatory lending accusations leveled against China. Additionally, the essay addresses
不断变化的现实:中非基础设施发展
通过广泛的基础设施投资组合,中国在帮助非洲减少基础设施赤字方面发挥了至关重要的作用。在过去15年里,在中国政府的帮助下,中国国有或与政府结盟的建筑和工程公司战略性地进入了非洲市场。在中国的“一带一路”倡议下,中国公司承担了大型基础设施项目,特别是在能源和交通领域,这可以帮助非洲国家实现更高水平的发展。然而,这些大型“一带一路”项目的价格高昂,加剧了一些非洲国家的债务压力。在这方面,许多国际(尤其是西方)参与者指责中国掠夺性的贷款行为和债务陷阱外交。在新冠肺炎大流行期间,这种说法进一步被放大,对非洲和世界各地的“一带一路”项目产生了重大影响。新冠肺炎疫情使人们对中国资助和建设的基础设施项目能否完成产生了一些怀疑,更重要的是,非洲国家是否有财政能力偿还这些发展贷款。由于非洲政府的收入减少,拖欠贷款的风险很高。此外,由于偿还贷款的负担,非洲国家在应对新冠肺炎及其经济后果方面受到阻碍。2021年11月举行的第八届中非合作论坛(FOCAC)表明,由于不断变化的现实——包括中国国内经济担忧、美中贸易紧张局势、新冠肺炎疫情对全球经济的影响以及非洲大流行引发的债务压力——北京似乎已经意识到,它不能继续充当非洲基础设施建设融资的首选银行。本文概述了中国可能不像过去几年那样愿意为非洲的基础设施发展项目提供资金。报告探讨了新冠疫情对“一带一路”基础设施项目在非洲发展的影响,并简要评估了针对中国的债务陷阱和掠夺性贷款指控的有效性。此外,文章地址
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Policy
Asia Policy Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Asia Policy is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal presenting policy-relevant academic research on the Asia-Pacific that draws clear and concise conclusions useful to today’s policymakers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信