New directions in contemporary French comedies: from nation, sex and class to ethnicity, community and the vagaries of the postmodern

Mary Harrod, P. Powrie
{"title":"New directions in contemporary French comedies: from nation, sex and class to ethnicity, community and the vagaries of the postmodern","authors":"Mary Harrod, P. Powrie","doi":"10.1080/14715880.2017.1415420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comedy, as is the case with many national cinemas, is one of the most dominant genres, if not the most dominant, in French cinema, as Raphaëlle Moine has shown (2014, 233–234). Comedies are even more popular now than they used to be in terms of spectator numbers. Since 2000, for example, French comedies have dominated the best-seller list in France, as can be seen in Table 1, which gives the 27 best-selling films since 2000.1 In the period 2000–2007 there were only 6 French comedies out of the 18 best-sellers in Table 1, representing a third (positions 11, 25, 26, 47, 57, 59), while from 2008–2014 6 out of 9 French films are comedies (positions 2, 3, 19, 51, 68, 96), representing two-thirds. This corresponds to a shift from a 39% share of the total number of French spectators in the first half of the period to an astonishing 72% of the best-selling films since 2008. And yet, surprisingly, while there are many coffee-table or popular books on the genre in French cinema, such as biographies of stars, there is as yet very little major academic work. General works on genre tend to focus on Hollywood comedies, occasionally with some nods to French comic stars, for example Olivier Mongin’s reflection on the genre which includes some work on Jacques Tati and Louis de Funès (Mongin 2002). There are few academic monographs on directors associated with the genre. There is a thesis on Pierre Colombier, active during the 1920s and 1930s, and director of major comic stars such as Georges Milton in Le Roi des resquilleurs (1930), Raimu in Ces messieurs de la Santé (1933) and Théodore et Cie (1933), and Fernandel in Ignace (1937) (Binet 2003), and a couple of standard introductions to the work of Jean-Pierre Mocky (Le Roy 2000; Prédal 1988). But there is as yet nothing substantial on Gérard Oury, JeanMarie Poiré or Francis Veber, directors of some of the most successful French comedies of the 1980s and beyond. The only two major works on French film comedy in recent times are both by Anglophone academics: Rémi Lanzoni’s broad introduction (2014) and Mary Harrod’s in-depth study of the recent development of the romcom (2015a). With the exception of some essential articles by Raphaëlle Moine, which we refer to in this introduction, there is as yet nothing major by French academics on contemporary developments. It is not difficult to understand why this is the case. Comedy, more than any other genre, is a ‘bad object’, a repository of low-denominator stereotypes and the source of the potentially guilty pleasure accruing from them that appears to be difficult to justify critically. This is particularly the case in France, where the critical establishment has until recently been more interested in auteur cinema than popular genres. As Moine has argued in her book on genre (2005, 66–85), whether one adopts the position of the Frankfurt School – that comedies like all genres function principally to maintain the status quo – or whether one adopts the position inspired by Lévi-Strauss’s analysis of myth – that comedy, like other genres, functions to express and reconcile social and cultural tensions – these two positions, antithetical in appearance, both operate to neutralise dissent, allowing bad objects to inculcate Sartrean bad faith as the audience unquestioningly accepts questionable representations. As Moine says, the guilty pleasure one may feel emerges from the fact that comedy ‘autorise un plaisir contre-culturel sans générer de danger social’2 (79).","PeriodicalId":51945,"journal":{"name":"Studies in French Cinema","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14715880.2017.1415420","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in French Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14715880.2017.1415420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Comedy, as is the case with many national cinemas, is one of the most dominant genres, if not the most dominant, in French cinema, as Raphaëlle Moine has shown (2014, 233–234). Comedies are even more popular now than they used to be in terms of spectator numbers. Since 2000, for example, French comedies have dominated the best-seller list in France, as can be seen in Table 1, which gives the 27 best-selling films since 2000.1 In the period 2000–2007 there were only 6 French comedies out of the 18 best-sellers in Table 1, representing a third (positions 11, 25, 26, 47, 57, 59), while from 2008–2014 6 out of 9 French films are comedies (positions 2, 3, 19, 51, 68, 96), representing two-thirds. This corresponds to a shift from a 39% share of the total number of French spectators in the first half of the period to an astonishing 72% of the best-selling films since 2008. And yet, surprisingly, while there are many coffee-table or popular books on the genre in French cinema, such as biographies of stars, there is as yet very little major academic work. General works on genre tend to focus on Hollywood comedies, occasionally with some nods to French comic stars, for example Olivier Mongin’s reflection on the genre which includes some work on Jacques Tati and Louis de Funès (Mongin 2002). There are few academic monographs on directors associated with the genre. There is a thesis on Pierre Colombier, active during the 1920s and 1930s, and director of major comic stars such as Georges Milton in Le Roi des resquilleurs (1930), Raimu in Ces messieurs de la Santé (1933) and Théodore et Cie (1933), and Fernandel in Ignace (1937) (Binet 2003), and a couple of standard introductions to the work of Jean-Pierre Mocky (Le Roy 2000; Prédal 1988). But there is as yet nothing substantial on Gérard Oury, JeanMarie Poiré or Francis Veber, directors of some of the most successful French comedies of the 1980s and beyond. The only two major works on French film comedy in recent times are both by Anglophone academics: Rémi Lanzoni’s broad introduction (2014) and Mary Harrod’s in-depth study of the recent development of the romcom (2015a). With the exception of some essential articles by Raphaëlle Moine, which we refer to in this introduction, there is as yet nothing major by French academics on contemporary developments. It is not difficult to understand why this is the case. Comedy, more than any other genre, is a ‘bad object’, a repository of low-denominator stereotypes and the source of the potentially guilty pleasure accruing from them that appears to be difficult to justify critically. This is particularly the case in France, where the critical establishment has until recently been more interested in auteur cinema than popular genres. As Moine has argued in her book on genre (2005, 66–85), whether one adopts the position of the Frankfurt School – that comedies like all genres function principally to maintain the status quo – or whether one adopts the position inspired by Lévi-Strauss’s analysis of myth – that comedy, like other genres, functions to express and reconcile social and cultural tensions – these two positions, antithetical in appearance, both operate to neutralise dissent, allowing bad objects to inculcate Sartrean bad faith as the audience unquestioningly accepts questionable representations. As Moine says, the guilty pleasure one may feel emerges from the fact that comedy ‘autorise un plaisir contre-culturel sans générer de danger social’2 (79).
当代法国喜剧的新方向:从国家、性别和阶级到种族、社区和后现代的变幻莫测
正如拉斐尔·莫因(Raphaëlle Moine)所展示的那样(2014年,233–234),喜剧与许多国家影院一样,是法国电影中最占主导地位的类型之一,如果不是最占主导的话。就观众数量而言,喜剧现在比过去更受欢迎。例如,自2000年以来,法国喜剧一直占据着法国畅销书排行榜的主导地位,如表1所示,表1列出了自2000年来最畅销的27部电影。1在2000-2007年期间,表1中的18部畅销书中只有6部法国喜剧,占三分之一(排名11、25、26、47、57、59),而从2008年到2014年,9部法国电影中有6部是喜剧(第2、3、19、51、68、96位),占三分之二。这相当于从上半年法国观众总数的39%转变为2008年以来最畅销电影的72%。然而,令人惊讶的是,尽管法国电影中有很多关于这一类型的咖啡桌或流行书籍,如明星传记,但迄今为止,主要的学术著作却很少。关于类型的一般作品往往侧重于好莱坞喜剧,偶尔也会向法国喜剧明星致敬,例如奥利维尔·蒙金对类型的反思,其中包括一些关于雅克·塔蒂和路易斯·德·方斯的作品(蒙金,2002年)。很少有与这一类型相关的关于导演的学术专著。有一篇关于皮埃尔·科隆比尔的论文,活跃于20世纪20年代和30年代,他是主要喜剧明星的导演,如乔治·米尔顿(Georges Milton)的《再创作之旅》(Le Roi des resquilleurs)(1930年)、雷穆(Raimu)的《圣特的救世主》(Ces messieurs de la Santé)(1933年)和《特奥多尔与西》(Théodore et Cie),以及费尔南德尔(Fernandel。但Gérard Oury、JeanMarie Poiré或Francis Veber这些20世纪80年代及以后最成功的法国喜剧的导演还没有什么实质性的东西。近年来,仅有的两部关于法国电影喜剧的主要作品都是英语学者的作品:雷米·兰佐尼的《广泛介绍》(2014)和玛丽·哈罗德对浪漫喜剧最近发展的深入研究(2015a)。除了我们在引言中提到的拉斐尔·莫因的一些重要文章外,法国学者还没有关于当代发展的重要文章。不难理解为什么会出现这种情况。喜剧比任何其他类型都更是一个“坏对象”,是低分母刻板印象的储存库,也是从中产生的潜在罪恶快乐的来源,而这种快乐似乎很难被批判性地证明。法国的情况尤其如此,直到最近,法国的评论界对导演电影比对流行电影更感兴趣。正如莫因在其关于类型的书(2005,66–85)中所说,无论是采用法兰克福学派的立场——喜剧与所有类型一样主要是为了维持现状——还是采用受莱维·斯特劳斯对神话的分析启发的立场——喜乐与其他类型一样,表达和调和社会和文化紧张关系的功能——这两种立场在外观上是对立的,都起到了中和异议的作用,允许不良对象在观众毫无疑问地接受可疑陈述时灌输萨特的恶意。正如莫因所说,人们可能会感到内疚的快乐,这源于喜剧“在没有社会危险的情况下控制文化”2(79)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in French Cinema
Studies in French Cinema FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信