[Social support perceived by pregnant women in Santa Marta, Colombia: A comparative analysisApoio social percebido por gestantes de Santa Marta, Colombia: uma análise comparativa].

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING
Revista Cuidarte Pub Date : 2023-03-29 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.15649/cuidarte.2448
Whitne Dayana Thomas-Hilarión, Laura Vanessa Fuentes-Vanegas, Yeison David Gallo-Barrera, Ediltrudis Ramos De la Cruz
{"title":"[Social support perceived by pregnant women in Santa Marta, Colombia: A comparative analysisApoio social percebido por gestantes de Santa Marta, Colombia: uma análise comparativa].","authors":"Whitne Dayana Thomas-Hilarión, Laura Vanessa Fuentes-Vanegas, Yeison David Gallo-Barrera, Ediltrudis Ramos De la Cruz","doi":"10.15649/cuidarte.2448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Perceived social support during gestation is important for perinatal mental health. However, little is known about these variables in the Colombian population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare perceived social support with sociodemographic and gynaeco-obstetric variables and positive affect in pregnant women in Santa Marta, Colombia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty women between 19 and 41 years of age (M=26.48; SD=5.03), in their third trimester of pregnancy and beneficiaries of a program to promote exclusive breastfeeding, participated. The participants filled out a sociodemographic and gynaeco-obstetric form, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) (a=0.88), and a subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) (a=0.82). The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparative statistical analyses. Ethical guidelines for human research were followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>67% of the participants belonged to a low socioeconomic status, 87.5% had a partner, 67.5% had a higher education, 42.5% were employed, and 47.5% were new mothers. Women of higher socioeconomic status perceived greater social support from their friends (p = 0.01). Family social support was significantly higher in first-time mothers (p=0.01) and mothers who reported higher positive affect (p = 0.03). Finally, social support from significant others was higher when it was the woman's first pregnancy (p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant differences were found in some dimensions of perceived social support according to socioeconomic status, being a first-time mother, and positive affect. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":43234,"journal":{"name":"Revista Cuidarte","volume":" ","pages":"e2448"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Cuidarte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.2448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Perceived social support during gestation is important for perinatal mental health. However, little is known about these variables in the Colombian population.

Objective: To compare perceived social support with sociodemographic and gynaeco-obstetric variables and positive affect in pregnant women in Santa Marta, Colombia.

Materials and methods: Forty women between 19 and 41 years of age (M=26.48; SD=5.03), in their third trimester of pregnancy and beneficiaries of a program to promote exclusive breastfeeding, participated. The participants filled out a sociodemographic and gynaeco-obstetric form, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) (a=0.88), and a subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) (a=0.82). The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparative statistical analyses. Ethical guidelines for human research were followed.

Results: 67% of the participants belonged to a low socioeconomic status, 87.5% had a partner, 67.5% had a higher education, 42.5% were employed, and 47.5% were new mothers. Women of higher socioeconomic status perceived greater social support from their friends (p = 0.01). Family social support was significantly higher in first-time mothers (p=0.01) and mothers who reported higher positive affect (p = 0.03). Finally, social support from significant others was higher when it was the woman's first pregnancy (p=0.02).

Conclusions: Significant differences were found in some dimensions of perceived social support according to socioeconomic status, being a first-time mother, and positive affect. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended.

哥伦比亚圣玛尔塔孕妇的社会支持感知:比较分析
导言:怀孕期间感知到的社会支持对围产期心理健康很重要。然而,哥伦比亚人口对这些变量知之甚少。目的:比较哥伦比亚圣玛尔塔孕妇根据社会人口学、性别平衡和积极情感变量感知的社会支持。材料和方法:40名19至41岁的妇女(M=26.48;DE=5.03)参加了一项促进纯母乳喂养的方案,她们正在怀孕的第三个季度。参与者编制了一份社会人口学和性别平衡信息表、多维感知社会支持量表(α=0.88)和积极和消极情感量表(α=0.82)的子量表。Mann-Whitney U检验用于比较统计分析,并遵循了人类研究的伦理准则。结果:67%的参与者社会经济地位较低,87.5%有伴侣,67.5%受过高等教育,42.5%有工作,47.5%是初生母亲。社会经济地位高的女性从朋友那里获得了更多的社会支持(P=0.01)。家庭社会支持在初生母亲中显著较高(P=0.01),在那些报告了更多积极情感的母亲中(P=0.03)。最后,显着个体在女性第一次怀孕时的社会支持较高(P=0.02)。结论:根据社会经济阶层、初生母亲和积极情感,感知到的社会支持的某些维度存在显著差异。建议进行更大样本量的其他研究。引用这篇文章:托马斯-希拉里翁·惠特·达亚纳,富恩特斯-瓦内加斯·劳拉·瓦内萨,加洛-巴雷拉·耶森·大卫,拉莫斯-德拉克鲁兹·埃迪尔特鲁迪斯。哥伦比亚圣玛尔塔孕妇感知的社会支持:比较分析。杂志照顾你。2022年;13(3):E2448。http://dx.doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.2448
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Cuidarte
Revista Cuidarte NURSING-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信