El control de convencionalidad en el Derecho español: ¿una importación defectuosa?

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Ignacio G. Perotti Pinciroli
{"title":"El control de convencionalidad en el Derecho español: ¿una importación defectuosa?","authors":"Ignacio G. Perotti Pinciroli","doi":"10.17103/reei.41.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolLa doctrina del control de convencionalidad era practicamente ajena al sistema juridico espanol. Sin embargo, en la STC 140/2018, de 20 de diciembre, el Tribunal Constitucional ha declarado expresamente que este mecanismo en Espana constituye una regla de seleccion de Derecho aplicable, a cargo de la jurisdiccion ordinaria. El articulo analiza los antecedentes del control de convencionalidad en el Derecho comparado –con especial enfasis en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos– y los problemas que esta nueva doctrina constitucional genera en la aplicacion del Derecho internacional de los derechos humanos en el Derecho espanol. EnglishThe Conventionality Control doctrine was almost strange to Spanish Law. However, in STC 140/2018, of 20 December 2018, the Constitutional Court of Spain construed that this mechanism is within the powers of Ordinary Judges and constitutes a rule of selection of applicable law. The article analyzes the meaning of the Conventionality Control doctrine from a Comparative law perspective, as well as its scope within the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. It also highlights some concerns regarding the implementation of the mechanism vis a vis the enforcement of International Human Rights Law in the Spanish legal system.","PeriodicalId":40338,"journal":{"name":"Revista Electronica de Estudios Internacionales","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Electronica de Estudios Internacionales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17103/reei.41.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

espanolLa doctrina del control de convencionalidad era practicamente ajena al sistema juridico espanol. Sin embargo, en la STC 140/2018, de 20 de diciembre, el Tribunal Constitucional ha declarado expresamente que este mecanismo en Espana constituye una regla de seleccion de Derecho aplicable, a cargo de la jurisdiccion ordinaria. El articulo analiza los antecedentes del control de convencionalidad en el Derecho comparado –con especial enfasis en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos– y los problemas que esta nueva doctrina constitucional genera en la aplicacion del Derecho internacional de los derechos humanos en el Derecho espanol. EnglishThe Conventionality Control doctrine was almost strange to Spanish Law. However, in STC 140/2018, of 20 December 2018, the Constitutional Court of Spain construed that this mechanism is within the powers of Ordinary Judges and constitutes a rule of selection of applicable law. The article analyzes the meaning of the Conventionality Control doctrine from a Comparative law perspective, as well as its scope within the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. It also highlights some concerns regarding the implementation of the mechanism vis a vis the enforcement of International Human Rights Law in the Spanish legal system.
西班牙法律中的常规控制:有缺陷的进口?
西班牙的传统控制学说实际上与西班牙法律制度格格不入。然而,在12月20日的STC 140/2018中,宪法法院明确表示,西班牙的这一机制构成了普通司法管辖区适用法律的选择规则。文章分析了比较法中传统性控制的背景,特别强调了美洲人权法院的判例,以及这一新的宪法学说在西班牙法律中适用国际人权法时产生的问题。英国传统控制理论几乎与西班牙法律格格不入。然而,在2018年12月20日的STC 140/2018中,西班牙宪法法院解释说,这一机制属于普通法官的权力范围,并构成了选择适用法律的规则。文章从比较法的角度分析了《公约》控制理论的含义及其在美洲人权法院的范围。它还强调了对在西班牙法律制度中执行国际人权法机制的一些关切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信