{"title":"Nephrolithiasis: Insights into Biomimics, Pathogenesis, and Pharmacology","authors":"Aishwarya Tripurasundari Devi , Rajini Nagaraj , Ashwini Prasad , Dhananjaya Bhadrapura Lakkappa , Farhan Zameer , Nagendra Prasad Mysore Nagalingaswamy","doi":"10.1016/j.ccmp.2022.100077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In the last decade, a varied prevalence of lifestyle-mediated health ailments ranging from infectious disorders to non-curable diseases has been observed. Globally the stone formation (lithiasis) in human kidneys has increased the trauma and economic burden. Furthermore, affordable rapid diagnosis, clinical trials, and therapeutics have to be addressed with newer holistic approaches.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The current comprehensive review attempts to study kidney stones using emerging translational, conventional, and non-conventional research models, which include prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems (<em>in vitro,</em> semi<em>-in vivo,</em> and <em>in vivo</em>).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study eligibility criteria included systematic reviews and meta-analyses to explore various lithiatic models. Further, PubMed, PubMed Central, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE were used as data sources for the current study. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) was used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All curated literature from past 55 years (1967–2022) were considered for this review with keywords as \"Experimental models for human kidney stones\" AND \"Nephrolithasis\" AND \"Urolithasis\". A total of 765 abstracts were reviewed for inclusion with 414 selected for full-text review. A total of 47 studies were analyzed. Mean AMSTAR score of 6.96/11 (± 1.84) suggests moderate quality of the systematic reviews.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This review will empower clinicians, veterinarians, and researchers for a better understanding of the pathogenesis, causative factors, and prevalence of nephrolithiasis and urolithiasis and their associated mechanisms with rapid, reliable, and reproducible models. The findings of the study will aid in designing global healthcare policy and regional insurance for lithiatic disorders with effective therapeutics which will result in an increased quality of life, leading to better health and hygiene.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72608,"journal":{"name":"Clinical complementary medicine and pharmacology","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100077"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical complementary medicine and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772371222000572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
In the last decade, a varied prevalence of lifestyle-mediated health ailments ranging from infectious disorders to non-curable diseases has been observed. Globally the stone formation (lithiasis) in human kidneys has increased the trauma and economic burden. Furthermore, affordable rapid diagnosis, clinical trials, and therapeutics have to be addressed with newer holistic approaches.
Objective
The current comprehensive review attempts to study kidney stones using emerging translational, conventional, and non-conventional research models, which include prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems (in vitro, semi-in vivo, and in vivo).
Methods
The study eligibility criteria included systematic reviews and meta-analyses to explore various lithiatic models. Further, PubMed, PubMed Central, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE were used as data sources for the current study. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) was used.
Results
All curated literature from past 55 years (1967–2022) were considered for this review with keywords as "Experimental models for human kidney stones" AND "Nephrolithasis" AND "Urolithasis". A total of 765 abstracts were reviewed for inclusion with 414 selected for full-text review. A total of 47 studies were analyzed. Mean AMSTAR score of 6.96/11 (± 1.84) suggests moderate quality of the systematic reviews.
Conclusion
This review will empower clinicians, veterinarians, and researchers for a better understanding of the pathogenesis, causative factors, and prevalence of nephrolithiasis and urolithiasis and their associated mechanisms with rapid, reliable, and reproducible models. The findings of the study will aid in designing global healthcare policy and regional insurance for lithiatic disorders with effective therapeutics which will result in an increased quality of life, leading to better health and hygiene.
在过去十年中,人们观察到由生活方式引起的各种健康疾病,从传染性疾病到不可治愈的疾病。在全球范围内,人类肾脏的结石形成(结石)增加了创伤和经济负担。此外,负担得起的快速诊断、临床试验和治疗方法必须采用更新的整体方法。目的:本综述试图利用新兴的转化、常规和非常规研究模型来研究肾结石,包括原核和真核系统(体外、半体内和体内)。方法采用系统评价和荟萃分析的方法,探讨各种岩性模型。此外,PubMed, PubMed Central, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, Web of Science和EMBASE被用作本研究的数据源。使用了评估系统评价的测量工具(AMSTAR)。结果本综述考虑了过去55年(1967-2022)的所有精选文献,关键词为“人类肾结石实验模型”、“肾结石”和“尿石症”。共审查了765篇摘要,其中414篇入选全文审查。总共分析了47项研究。平均AMSTAR评分为6.96/11(±1.84),表明系统评价质量中等。结论本综述将使临床医生、兽医和研究人员更好地了解肾结石和尿石症的发病机制、病因、患病率及其相关机制,并建立快速、可靠和可重复的模型。这项研究的结果将有助于制定全球医疗保健政策和针对结石性疾病的区域保险,并提供有效的治疗方法,从而提高生活质量,改善健康和卫生状况。