{"title":"„Ein modernes Verdeutschungs-Unternehmen“. Über die historische Semantik der Buber-Rosenzweig-Bibel","authors":"I. Sauter","doi":"10.1515/naha-2020-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article traces a debate on Martin Buber and Franz Rosenzweig’s Germanization of the Bible. The trigger of the debate was Siegfried Kracauer’s infamous critique entitled “Die Bibel auf Deutsch” (“The Bible in German”), published in April 1926 in the Frankfurter Zeitung. In his harsh review of the first volume of the translation, Kracauer regards the use of the German language by Buber and Rosenzweig as an archaization. Relying in part on unpublished letters, this paper presents and explores the different perceptions of the translation, which embody the depths these fault lines penetrated both in general public discourse and, more specifically, in German-Jewish circles. This article also points towards the change of the German language in the 19th century that is embedded in the historical semantics of the Buber-Rosenzweig Bible.","PeriodicalId":40309,"journal":{"name":"Naharaim","volume":"15 1","pages":"243 - 267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naharaim","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/naha-2020-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract This article traces a debate on Martin Buber and Franz Rosenzweig’s Germanization of the Bible. The trigger of the debate was Siegfried Kracauer’s infamous critique entitled “Die Bibel auf Deutsch” (“The Bible in German”), published in April 1926 in the Frankfurter Zeitung. In his harsh review of the first volume of the translation, Kracauer regards the use of the German language by Buber and Rosenzweig as an archaization. Relying in part on unpublished letters, this paper presents and explores the different perceptions of the translation, which embody the depths these fault lines penetrated both in general public discourse and, more specifically, in German-Jewish circles. This article also points towards the change of the German language in the 19th century that is embedded in the historical semantics of the Buber-Rosenzweig Bible.
摘要本文追溯了马丁·布伯和弗朗茨·罗森茨威格关于《圣经》日耳曼化的争论。这场争论的导火索是齐格弗里德·克拉考于1926年4月在《法兰克福汇报》上发表的题为“Die Bibel auf Deutsch”(“德语圣经”)的臭名昭著的评论。在他对翻译第一卷的严厉评论中,克拉考认为布伯和罗森茨威格使用德语是一种古老化。部分依靠未发表的信件,本文提出并探讨了对翻译的不同看法,这些看法体现了这些断层线在一般公共话语中,更具体地说,在德国犹太圈子中渗透的深度。本文还指出了德语在19世纪的变化,这种变化嵌入了《布伯-罗森茨威格圣经》的历史语义中。