Comparison of SVM and LIWC for Sentiment Analysis of SARA

Eka Karyawati, Prasetyo Adi Utomo, Gede Arta Wibawa
{"title":"Comparison of SVM and LIWC for Sentiment Analysis of SARA","authors":"Eka Karyawati, Prasetyo Adi Utomo, Gede Arta Wibawa","doi":"10.22146/ijccs.69617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SARA is a sensitive issue based on sentiments about self-identity regarding ancestry, religion, nationality or ethnicity. The impact of the issue of SARA is conflict between groups that leads to hatred and division. SARA issues are widely spread through social media, especially Twitter. To overcome the problem of SARA, it is necessary to develop an effective method to filter negative SARA. This study aims to analyze Indonesian-language tweets and determine whether the tweet contains positive or negative SARA or does not contain SARA (neutral). Machine learning (i.e., SVM) and lexicon-based method (i.e., LIWC) were compared based on 450 tweet data to determine the best approach for each sentiment (positive, negative, and neutral). The best evaluation results are shown in the negative SARA classification using SVM with λ = 3 and γ = 0.1, where Precision = 0.9, Recall = 0.6, and F1-Score = 0.72. The best results from the positive SARA classification were shown in the LIWC method, where Precision = 0.6, Recall = 0.8, and F1-Score = 0.69. The best evaluation results for neutral classification are shown in SVM with λ = 3 and γ = 0.1, with Precision = 0.52, Recall = 0.87, and F1-Score = 0.65.","PeriodicalId":31625,"journal":{"name":"IJCCS Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJCCS Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.69617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

SARA is a sensitive issue based on sentiments about self-identity regarding ancestry, religion, nationality or ethnicity. The impact of the issue of SARA is conflict between groups that leads to hatred and division. SARA issues are widely spread through social media, especially Twitter. To overcome the problem of SARA, it is necessary to develop an effective method to filter negative SARA. This study aims to analyze Indonesian-language tweets and determine whether the tweet contains positive or negative SARA or does not contain SARA (neutral). Machine learning (i.e., SVM) and lexicon-based method (i.e., LIWC) were compared based on 450 tweet data to determine the best approach for each sentiment (positive, negative, and neutral). The best evaluation results are shown in the negative SARA classification using SVM with λ = 3 and γ = 0.1, where Precision = 0.9, Recall = 0.6, and F1-Score = 0.72. The best results from the positive SARA classification were shown in the LIWC method, where Precision = 0.6, Recall = 0.8, and F1-Score = 0.69. The best evaluation results for neutral classification are shown in SVM with λ = 3 and γ = 0.1, with Precision = 0.52, Recall = 0.87, and F1-Score = 0.65.
SVM与LIWC在严重急性呼吸系统综合征情绪分析中的比较
严重急性呼吸系统综合征是一个基于对祖先、宗教、国籍或种族的自我认同情绪的敏感问题。严重急性呼吸系统综合征问题的影响是群体之间的冲突,导致仇恨和分裂。严重急性呼吸系统综合征问题通过社交媒体,尤其是推特广泛传播。为了克服严重急性呼吸系统综合征的问题,有必要开发一种有效的方法来过滤阴性严重急性呼吸综合征。本研究旨在分析印尼语推文,并确定推文是否包含积极或消极的严重急性呼吸系统综合征或不包含严重急性呼吸综合征(中性)。基于450条推特数据,比较了机器学习(即SVM)和基于词典的方法(即LIWC),以确定每种情绪(积极、消极和中性)的最佳方法。最佳评估结果显示在使用SVM的阴性严重急性呼吸系统综合征分类中,λ=3,γ=0.1,其中Precision=0.9,Recall=0.6,F1 Score=0.72。阳性严重急性呼吸系统综合征分类的最佳结果显示在LIWC方法中,其中Precision=0.6,Recall=0.8,F1 Score=0.69。中性分类的最佳评估结果显示在SVM中,λ=3,γ=0.1,Precision=0.52,Recall=0.87,F1 Score=0.65。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信