Book Review: Social Research and Disability. Developing Inclusive Research Spaces for Disabled Researchers by Ciaran Burke and Bronagh Byrne (eds.)

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
J. Lundälv
{"title":"Book Review: Social Research and Disability. Developing Inclusive Research Spaces for Disabled Researchers by Ciaran Burke and Bronagh Byrne (eds.)","authors":"J. Lundälv","doi":"10.1177/13882627211059192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"they have regarding social policy, but also about understanding how they are organised, how different issues are linked with other topics in their portfolio, and how they combine different world views in order to disseminate ideas. Third, the whole chain of shaping discourses is thus covered, leading to new empirical insights. The first main lesson is the role played by IOs in establishing priorities and structuring different fields. For instance, the second chapter explains their contribution to shaping youth unemployment as an important policy field, with education becoming a cross-cutting issue for many IOs, resulting in a convergence of the discourse. In some other cases, it may go in the other direction. The way the field itself is structured may impact the dynamic evolution of IOs, as with migration and care issues in chapter 4 or the evolution of climate change in chapter 11. The way IOs contribute to establish priorities and disseminate ideas is reflected in the effectiveness of national policies. In chapter 13, the authors show how food security remains a fundamental problem today and assert that IOs are part of the problem, displaying an overly optimistic trust in the markets to solve the issue. The second important lesson is the connection between discourses and the intrinsic features of IOs, also leading to different interactions with other IOs in the same policy field. The ILO and the World Bank, two dominating IOs in the global governance of social policy, are organised very differently. It leads to opposing logics regarding, labour and migration issues (chapter 2) and also supports the continuation of their dominant positions over time. The different intrinsic features of both key players have resulted in different discourses between a social and a neoliberal discourse regarding global labour standards (chapter 3), pensions (chapter 5), family policies between the North and the South (chapter 8) and disability (chapter 9). Overall, the book shows the importance of a strong contextual perspective for understanding the complexity of the architecture of global social governance and the variety of factors that shape this complexity and the resulting discourses.","PeriodicalId":44670,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Security","volume":"23 1","pages":"400 - 402"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627211059192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

they have regarding social policy, but also about understanding how they are organised, how different issues are linked with other topics in their portfolio, and how they combine different world views in order to disseminate ideas. Third, the whole chain of shaping discourses is thus covered, leading to new empirical insights. The first main lesson is the role played by IOs in establishing priorities and structuring different fields. For instance, the second chapter explains their contribution to shaping youth unemployment as an important policy field, with education becoming a cross-cutting issue for many IOs, resulting in a convergence of the discourse. In some other cases, it may go in the other direction. The way the field itself is structured may impact the dynamic evolution of IOs, as with migration and care issues in chapter 4 or the evolution of climate change in chapter 11. The way IOs contribute to establish priorities and disseminate ideas is reflected in the effectiveness of national policies. In chapter 13, the authors show how food security remains a fundamental problem today and assert that IOs are part of the problem, displaying an overly optimistic trust in the markets to solve the issue. The second important lesson is the connection between discourses and the intrinsic features of IOs, also leading to different interactions with other IOs in the same policy field. The ILO and the World Bank, two dominating IOs in the global governance of social policy, are organised very differently. It leads to opposing logics regarding, labour and migration issues (chapter 2) and also supports the continuation of their dominant positions over time. The different intrinsic features of both key players have resulted in different discourses between a social and a neoliberal discourse regarding global labour standards (chapter 3), pensions (chapter 5), family policies between the North and the South (chapter 8) and disability (chapter 9). Overall, the book shows the importance of a strong contextual perspective for understanding the complexity of the architecture of global social governance and the variety of factors that shape this complexity and the resulting discourses.
书评:社会研究与残疾。为残疾研究人员开发包容性研究空间,作者:Ciaran Burke和Bronagh Byrne(编)
他们有关于社会政策的知识,也有关于理解他们是如何组织的,不同的问题如何与他们作品集中的其他主题联系在一起,以及他们如何将不同的世界观结合起来以传播思想。第三,形成话语的整个链条由此被覆盖,从而产生新的经验见解。第一个主要教训是国际组织在确定优先事项和构建不同领域方面发挥的作用。例如,第二章解释了他们对将青年失业塑造为一个重要政策领域的贡献,教育成为许多国际组织的一个交叉问题,导致了话语的趋同。在其他一些情况下,它可能会朝着另一个方向发展。该领域本身的结构方式可能会影响国际组织的动态演变,如第4章中的移民和护理问题或第11章中的气候变化演变。国际组织为确定优先事项和传播思想作出贡献的方式反映在国家政策的有效性上。在第13章中,作者展示了粮食安全如何在今天仍然是一个根本问题,并断言国际组织是问题的一部分,表现出对市场解决问题的过度乐观的信任。第二个重要的教训是话语与IO的内在特征之间的联系,也导致了与同一政策领域的其他IO的不同互动。国际劳工组织和世界银行是全球社会政策治理中的两个主导组织,它们的组织方式截然不同。它导致了关于劳工和移民问题的对立逻辑(第2章),也支持他们随着时间的推移继续占据主导地位。两个关键参与者的不同内在特征导致了社会和新自由主义话语之间关于全球劳工标准(第3章)、养老金(第5章)、南北家庭政策(第8章)和残疾(第9章)的不同话语。总的来说,这本书展示了强大的语境视角对于理解全球社会治理架构的复杂性以及塑造这种复杂性的各种因素和由此产生的话语的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Social Security
European Journal of Social Security PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信