On the Selection of Sensitivity Analysis Methods in the Context of Tolerance Management

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Björn Heling, Thomas Oberleiter, B. Schleich, K. Willner, S. Wartzack
{"title":"On the Selection of Sensitivity Analysis Methods in the Context of Tolerance Management","authors":"Björn Heling, Thomas Oberleiter, B. Schleich, K. Willner, S. Wartzack","doi":"10.1115/1.4043912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although mass production parts look the same at first sight, every manufactured part is unique, at least on a closer inspection. The reason for this is that every manufactured part is inevitable subjected to different scattering influencing factors and variation in the manufacturing process, such as varying temperatures or tool wear. Products, which are built from these deviation-afflicted parts, consequently show deviations from their ideal properties. To ensure that every single product nevertheless meets its technical requirements, it is necessary to specify the permitted deviations. Furthermore, it is crucial to estimate the consequences of the permitted deviations, which is done via tolerance analysis. During this process, the imperfect parts are assembled virtually and the effects of the geometric deviations can be calculated. Since the tolerance analysis enables engineers to identify weak points in an early design stage, it is important to know which contribution every single tolerance has on a certain quality-relevant characteristic to restrict or increase the correct tolerances. In this paper, four different methods to calculate the sensitivity are introduced and compared. Based on the comparison, guidelines are derived which are intended to facilitate a selection of these different methods. In particular, a newly developed approach, which is based on fuzzy arithmetic, is compared to the established high–low–median method, a variance-based method, and a density-based approach. Since all these methods are based on different assumptions, their advantages and disadvantages are critically discussed based on two case studies.","PeriodicalId":52254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Although mass production parts look the same at first sight, every manufactured part is unique, at least on a closer inspection. The reason for this is that every manufactured part is inevitable subjected to different scattering influencing factors and variation in the manufacturing process, such as varying temperatures or tool wear. Products, which are built from these deviation-afflicted parts, consequently show deviations from their ideal properties. To ensure that every single product nevertheless meets its technical requirements, it is necessary to specify the permitted deviations. Furthermore, it is crucial to estimate the consequences of the permitted deviations, which is done via tolerance analysis. During this process, the imperfect parts are assembled virtually and the effects of the geometric deviations can be calculated. Since the tolerance analysis enables engineers to identify weak points in an early design stage, it is important to know which contribution every single tolerance has on a certain quality-relevant characteristic to restrict or increase the correct tolerances. In this paper, four different methods to calculate the sensitivity are introduced and compared. Based on the comparison, guidelines are derived which are intended to facilitate a selection of these different methods. In particular, a newly developed approach, which is based on fuzzy arithmetic, is compared to the established high–low–median method, a variance-based method, and a density-based approach. Since all these methods are based on different assumptions, their advantages and disadvantages are critically discussed based on two case studies.
公差管理背景下敏感性分析方法的选择
尽管批量生产的零件乍一看是一样的,但至少在仔细检查时,每个制造的零件都是独一无二的。原因是每个制造的零件都不可避免地会受到不同的散射影响因素和制造过程中的变化,例如不同的温度或工具磨损。由这些受偏差影响的零件制成的产品,因此显示出与理想性能的偏差。为了确保每一种产品都符合其技术要求,有必要规定允许的偏差。此外,通过公差分析来估计允许偏差的后果是至关重要的。在此过程中,对不完美的零件进行虚拟装配,并可以计算几何偏差的影响。由于公差分析使工程师能够在早期设计阶段识别弱点,因此了解每个公差对某个质量相关特性的贡献对于限制或增加正确的公差非常重要。本文介绍并比较了四种不同的灵敏度计算方法。在比较的基础上,得出了旨在促进选择这些不同方法的指南。特别是,将一种新开发的基于模糊算法的方法与已建立的高-低-中值方法、基于方差的方法和基于密度的方法进行了比较。由于所有这些方法都基于不同的假设,因此在两个案例研究的基础上批判性地讨论了它们的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信