Effect of Ultrasonic Pretreatment of Sewage Sludge on the Performance of Bioelectrochemical Anaerobic Digester

Donghwan Lee, Jinwon Kim, Hwijin Seo, Yongtae Ahn
{"title":"Effect of Ultrasonic Pretreatment of Sewage Sludge on the Performance of Bioelectrochemical Anaerobic Digester","authors":"Donghwan Lee, Jinwon Kim, Hwijin Seo, Yongtae Ahn","doi":"10.4491/ksee.2022.44.1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives : This study examined the effect of ultrasonic pretreatment on primary sewage sludge (raw sludge) solubilization and its subsequent microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) operation performance.Methods : To compare the effect of ultrasound on raw sludge solubilization, ultrasonic pretreatment was conducted at 1~4 W/mL energy density for 5~30 min. In MECs operation, raw sludge was used as a control group, and ultrasound pretreated sludge was used as an experimental group. For comparing MECs performance, biogas production, and organic matter removal were analyzed.Results and Discussion : The optimal experimental condition for ultrasonic pretreatment were 30 min of sonication time at 3 W/mL. In methane production, MEC with ultrasound pretreatment (MEC 3W) produced 243 mL/L more methane than that of unpretreated MEC (MEC) by 4,970 mL/L at 1, 3 cycles. In the modified Gompertz model analysis, the lag phase of MEC 3W was 0.46 days, which was 0.12 days longer than MEC. The maximum methane production rate of MEC 3W by 938.5 mL/L/day was also higher than MEC. MEC 3W showed a 1.8% higher TS removal rate, 2.4% VS removal rate than MEC. COD removal rate also improved by 2.0% when ultrasound pretreatment was applied. The methane yield of MEC with ultrasound pretreatment (377.4 mL/g VSin.) was 0.4% higher than that of MEC without pretreatment.Conclusion Ultrasonic pretreatment of sewage sludge improved the methane production and organic removal in microbial electrolysis cells. It is necessary to find the optimal operating conditions to obtain the maximize the performance.","PeriodicalId":52756,"journal":{"name":"daehanhwangyeonggonghaghoeji","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"daehanhwangyeonggonghaghoeji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4491/ksee.2022.44.1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives : This study examined the effect of ultrasonic pretreatment on primary sewage sludge (raw sludge) solubilization and its subsequent microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) operation performance.Methods : To compare the effect of ultrasound on raw sludge solubilization, ultrasonic pretreatment was conducted at 1~4 W/mL energy density for 5~30 min. In MECs operation, raw sludge was used as a control group, and ultrasound pretreated sludge was used as an experimental group. For comparing MECs performance, biogas production, and organic matter removal were analyzed.Results and Discussion : The optimal experimental condition for ultrasonic pretreatment were 30 min of sonication time at 3 W/mL. In methane production, MEC with ultrasound pretreatment (MEC 3W) produced 243 mL/L more methane than that of unpretreated MEC (MEC) by 4,970 mL/L at 1, 3 cycles. In the modified Gompertz model analysis, the lag phase of MEC 3W was 0.46 days, which was 0.12 days longer than MEC. The maximum methane production rate of MEC 3W by 938.5 mL/L/day was also higher than MEC. MEC 3W showed a 1.8% higher TS removal rate, 2.4% VS removal rate than MEC. COD removal rate also improved by 2.0% when ultrasound pretreatment was applied. The methane yield of MEC with ultrasound pretreatment (377.4 mL/g VSin.) was 0.4% higher than that of MEC without pretreatment.Conclusion Ultrasonic pretreatment of sewage sludge improved the methane production and organic removal in microbial electrolysis cells. It is necessary to find the optimal operating conditions to obtain the maximize the performance.
污泥超声预处理对电化学厌氧沼池性能的影响
目的:研究超声波预处理对初级污泥(原污泥)溶解及其后续微生物电解池(MECs)运行性能的影响。方法:为了比较超声对原污泥溶解的影响,在1~4W/mL能量密度下进行超声预处理5~30min。在MECs操作中,原污泥作为对照组,超声预处理污泥作为实验组。为了比较MECs的性能,分析了沼气的产生和有机物的去除。结果与讨论:超声预处理的最佳实验条件为超声处理时间为30min,超声处理浓度为3W/mL。在甲烷生产中,超声预处理的MEC(MEC 3W)在1、3个循环中产生的甲烷比未经预处理的MEC(MEC)多243mL/L,多4970mL/L。在改进的Gompertz模型分析中,MEC 3W的滞后期为0.46天,比MEC长0.12天。MEC 3W的最大甲烷生成速率为938.5mL/L/天,也高于MEC。MEC 3W的TS去除率比MEC高1.8%,VS去除率为2.4%。超声波预处理对COD的去除率也提高了2.0%。超声预处理的MEC的甲烷产率(377.4mL/g VSin)比未预处理的高0.4%。结论超声波预处理污泥提高了微生物电解槽的甲烷生成和有机物去除率。为了获得最大的性能,必须找到最佳的操作条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信