Regional Settlement Demography in Archaeology

Q1 Social Sciences
M. Smith
{"title":"Regional Settlement Demography in Archaeology","authors":"M. Smith","doi":"10.1080/0734578X.2022.2089320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"faced by art history terminology. In terms of possible shortcomings of this book, I find it difficult to judge what is missing in terms of art history. However, as a Caribbeanist, I am troubled by the exclusion of Aruba, Bonaire, Curacao, and other islands off the northwestern coast of Venezuela from the text. Waldron argues that these islands were excluded due to having different artistic traditions, based on migration from the Middle, rather than Lower Orinoco region. Given that recent DNA studies throughout the Caribbean have seriously questioned existing migration theories, this exclusion may not be justifiable in the future. Fortunately, Waldron openly acknowledges this book as a preliminary effort, leaving the door open for future revisions. Waldron has managed to produce a sorely needed overview of current Pre-Columbian Caribbean archaeology in easily readable English, even if it is officially an art history text. The fact that this was achieved by someone from outside our field should act as a wake-up call, and perhaps motivate a change in scholarship production within the Pre-Columbian archaeology field, particularly with regards to moving on from discussions about Irving Rouse’s classification scheme, and controversies such as the Huecoid problem. Instead, more time should be spent filling in the increasingly obvious lacunae being unearthed by the closer scrutiny of archaeological data by our fellow Caribbeanists.","PeriodicalId":34945,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Archaeology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeastern Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0734578X.2022.2089320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

faced by art history terminology. In terms of possible shortcomings of this book, I find it difficult to judge what is missing in terms of art history. However, as a Caribbeanist, I am troubled by the exclusion of Aruba, Bonaire, Curacao, and other islands off the northwestern coast of Venezuela from the text. Waldron argues that these islands were excluded due to having different artistic traditions, based on migration from the Middle, rather than Lower Orinoco region. Given that recent DNA studies throughout the Caribbean have seriously questioned existing migration theories, this exclusion may not be justifiable in the future. Fortunately, Waldron openly acknowledges this book as a preliminary effort, leaving the door open for future revisions. Waldron has managed to produce a sorely needed overview of current Pre-Columbian Caribbean archaeology in easily readable English, even if it is officially an art history text. The fact that this was achieved by someone from outside our field should act as a wake-up call, and perhaps motivate a change in scholarship production within the Pre-Columbian archaeology field, particularly with regards to moving on from discussions about Irving Rouse’s classification scheme, and controversies such as the Huecoid problem. Instead, more time should be spent filling in the increasingly obvious lacunae being unearthed by the closer scrutiny of archaeological data by our fellow Caribbeanists.
考古学中的区域聚落人口学
面对艺术史术语。就这本书可能存在的缺点而言,我发现很难判断在艺术史方面缺失了什么。然而,作为加勒比人,我对委内瑞拉西北海岸外的阿鲁巴、博内尔、库拉索和其他岛屿被排除在文本之外感到不安。Waldron认为,这些岛屿被排除在外是因为它们有不同的艺术传统,这些传统是基于来自中部而不是下奥里诺科河地区的移民。鉴于最近整个加勒比地区的DNA研究严重质疑了现有的移民理论,这种排除在未来可能是不合理的。幸运的是,Waldron公开承认这本书是一个初步的努力,为未来的修订敞开了大门。沃尔德伦成功地用通俗易懂的英语对当前前哥伦布时期的加勒比海考古学进行了概述,尽管它是一本正式的艺术史文本。这是由我们领域之外的人完成的,这一事实应该是一个警钟,也许会激发前哥伦布考古领域的学术成果的变化,特别是关于欧文·劳斯的分类方案的讨论,以及像Huecoid问题这样的争议。相反,我们应该花更多的时间来填补我们的加勒比同胞对考古资料进行更仔细的审查所发现的日益明显的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Southeastern Archaeology
Southeastern Archaeology Social Sciences-Archeology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Southeastern Archaeology is a refereed journal that publishes works concerning the archaeology and history of southeastern North America and neighboring regions. It covers all time periods, from Paleoindian to recent history and defines the southeast broadly; this could be anything from Florida (south) to Wisconsin (North) and from Oklahoma (west) to Virginia (east). Reports or articles that cover neighboring regions such as the Northeast, Plains, or Caribbean would be considered if they had sufficient relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信