Detection and evaluation of fraud during the public sector audit

L. Sokolenko
{"title":"Detection and evaluation of fraud during the public sector audit","authors":"L. Sokolenko","doi":"10.31767/su.2(97)2022.02.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The activities of public sector institutions are an area, which is sensitive to the fraud risks. This is due to the significant use of budget funding, the existence and access to state property. Fraud and corruption are serious threats to the functioning of the public sector because of the potential financial and reputation damage and consequences from fraud for the institution. The application of international standards and best practices of public sector audit will allow to detect and prevent cases of fraud. It will help to save budget funds and state property. The research is based on the results of scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists, texts of international auditing standards on public sector audit (ISSAI) and national regulations of Ukraine. The study used cases of fraud with budget funds basing the information from the reports of the Accounting Chamber of Ukraine for 2018-2021. Therefore, there may be no direct visible evidence of fraud, and the auditor should pay attention to identifying fraud risks, including third parties’ testimonials, to consider the results of previous public audits, to provide interviews with management and employees of organization. The general procedure for detecting fraud during a public sector audit is determined in paper. It includes the range of steps, that should be done by public sector auditor: fraud risk assessment at the audit planning stage; identification of transactions for which audit procedures should be performed; audit evidence gathering, assessment of their sufficiency and acceptability and conducting additional procedures (if necessary); consideration of audit evidence and the formation of an opinion on the existence of fraud facts; communication on the information to those who are endowed with the highest authority at the object of audit; consideration of competent authorities to be informed of the existence of fraud at the object of audit. This will help to structure the audit work during the public sector audit and to determine the logic of the auditing process based on the assessed risks of fraud, and to achieve results of auditor procedures, that could be evaluated.","PeriodicalId":52812,"journal":{"name":"Statistika Ukrayini","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistika Ukrayini","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31767/su.2(97)2022.02.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The activities of public sector institutions are an area, which is sensitive to the fraud risks. This is due to the significant use of budget funding, the existence and access to state property. Fraud and corruption are serious threats to the functioning of the public sector because of the potential financial and reputation damage and consequences from fraud for the institution. The application of international standards and best practices of public sector audit will allow to detect and prevent cases of fraud. It will help to save budget funds and state property. The research is based on the results of scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists, texts of international auditing standards on public sector audit (ISSAI) and national regulations of Ukraine. The study used cases of fraud with budget funds basing the information from the reports of the Accounting Chamber of Ukraine for 2018-2021. Therefore, there may be no direct visible evidence of fraud, and the auditor should pay attention to identifying fraud risks, including third parties’ testimonials, to consider the results of previous public audits, to provide interviews with management and employees of organization. The general procedure for detecting fraud during a public sector audit is determined in paper. It includes the range of steps, that should be done by public sector auditor: fraud risk assessment at the audit planning stage; identification of transactions for which audit procedures should be performed; audit evidence gathering, assessment of their sufficiency and acceptability and conducting additional procedures (if necessary); consideration of audit evidence and the formation of an opinion on the existence of fraud facts; communication on the information to those who are endowed with the highest authority at the object of audit; consideration of competent authorities to be informed of the existence of fraud at the object of audit. This will help to structure the audit work during the public sector audit and to determine the logic of the auditing process based on the assessed risks of fraud, and to achieve results of auditor procedures, that could be evaluated.
公共部门审计中舞弊行为的发现和评估
公共部门机构的活动是一个对欺诈风险敏感的领域。这是由于预算资金的大量使用、国有财产的存在和使用。欺诈和腐败是对公共部门运作的严重威胁,因为欺诈可能会对该机构造成财务和声誉损害及后果。应用公共部门审计的国际标准和最佳做法将有助于发现和预防欺诈案件。这将有助于节省预算资金和国有财产。该研究基于国内外科学家的科学工作成果、公共部门审计国际审计标准文本和乌克兰国家法规。该研究根据乌克兰会计院2018-2021年报告中的信息,使用了预算资金欺诈案件。因此,可能没有直接可见的欺诈证据,审计师应注意识别欺诈风险,包括第三方的证明,考虑以前的公开审计结果,与组织的管理层和员工进行面谈。文件确定了在公共部门审计中发现舞弊的一般程序。它包括公共部门审计员应采取的一系列步骤:在审计规划阶段进行欺诈风险评估;确定应执行审计程序的交易;审计证据收集,评估其充分性和可接受性,并进行额外程序(如有必要);审议审计证据并就欺诈事实的存在形成意见;向被赋予审计对象最高权力的人员传达信息;考虑向主管当局通报审计对象存在欺诈行为。这将有助于在公共部门审计期间安排审计工作,并根据评估的欺诈风险确定审计过程的逻辑,并实现可评估的审计程序的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信