Unaccommodating Spinoza’s Liberal Theology

Q4 Social Sciences
Samuel A. Stoner
{"title":"Unaccommodating Spinoza’s Liberal Theology","authors":"Samuel A. Stoner","doi":"10.1080/10457097.2022.2121112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This review essay explores Chapter One of Aaron Herold’s recent book, The Democratic Soul: Spinoza, Tocqueville, and Enlightenment Theology. After tracing out the logic of Herold’s reconstruction of “Spinoza’s Liberal Theology,” it suggests a Spinozistic rejoinder to the Tocquevillian critique of Spinoza that Herold develops in his book. Further, it raises the question of Spinoza’s understanding of the scope and character of the project of enlightenment that he envisions. Finally, it points toward a Tocquevillian critique of Spinoza’s liberal theology that Herold suggests but does not explicitly develop.","PeriodicalId":55874,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Political Science","volume":"51 1","pages":"173 - 175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2022.2121112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This review essay explores Chapter One of Aaron Herold’s recent book, The Democratic Soul: Spinoza, Tocqueville, and Enlightenment Theology. After tracing out the logic of Herold’s reconstruction of “Spinoza’s Liberal Theology,” it suggests a Spinozistic rejoinder to the Tocquevillian critique of Spinoza that Herold develops in his book. Further, it raises the question of Spinoza’s understanding of the scope and character of the project of enlightenment that he envisions. Finally, it points toward a Tocquevillian critique of Spinoza’s liberal theology that Herold suggests but does not explicitly develop.
斯宾诺莎的自由主义神学
这篇评论文章探讨了亚伦·赫罗尔德的新书《民主灵魂:斯宾诺莎、托克维尔和启蒙神学》的第一章。在追溯了赫罗尔德重建“斯宾诺莎的自由神学”的逻辑之后,它提出了一种斯宾诺莎式的反驳,以反驳赫罗尔德在他的书中对斯宾诺莎的托克维尔式批评。此外,它提出了斯宾诺莎对他所设想的启蒙工程的范围和特征的理解的问题。最后,它指向了托克维尔式的对斯宾诺莎自由主义神学的批判,赫罗尔德提出了这种批评,但没有明确地加以发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives on Political Science
Perspectives on Political Science Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Whether discussing Montaigne"s case for tolerance or Nietzsche"s political critique of modern science, Perspectives on Political Science links contemporary politics and culture to the enduring questions posed by great thinkers from antiquity to the present. Ideas are the lifeblood of the journal, which comprises articles, symposia, and book reviews. Recent articles address the writings of Aristotle, Adam Smith, and Plutarch; the movies No Country for Old Men and 3:10 to Yuma; and the role of humility in modern political thought.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信