Nikoline G. Oturai , Maria Bille Nielsen , Lauge Peter Westergaard Clausen , Steffen Foss Hansen , Kristian Syberg
{"title":"Strength in numbers: How citizen science can upscale assessment of human exposure to plastic pollution","authors":"Nikoline G. Oturai , Maria Bille Nielsen , Lauge Peter Westergaard Clausen , Steffen Foss Hansen , Kristian Syberg","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2021.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Plastic pollution is ubiquitous, and the presence of plastic particles available for human uptake is documented, for example, in air, foodstuffs, and drinking water. Meanwhile, researchers, organizations, and policy agencies call for large-scale analyses of plastic pollution exposure. Doing precisely this in neighboring research fields, we argue that citizen science (CS) can contribute to close knowledge gaps for human exposure. We reviewed the recent literature (2019-present) on the assessment of human exposure to plastic pollution using CS to document the state-of-the-art and only found a single study. We discuss the strength of citizen-generated evidence regarding the most prominent exposure routes, and we present an example of a future, large-scale CS project assessing plastic exposure via drinking water.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37736,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","volume":"27 ","pages":"Pages 54-59"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cotox.2021.08.003","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202021000383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Plastic pollution is ubiquitous, and the presence of plastic particles available for human uptake is documented, for example, in air, foodstuffs, and drinking water. Meanwhile, researchers, organizations, and policy agencies call for large-scale analyses of plastic pollution exposure. Doing precisely this in neighboring research fields, we argue that citizen science (CS) can contribute to close knowledge gaps for human exposure. We reviewed the recent literature (2019-present) on the assessment of human exposure to plastic pollution using CS to document the state-of-the-art and only found a single study. We discuss the strength of citizen-generated evidence regarding the most prominent exposure routes, and we present an example of a future, large-scale CS project assessing plastic exposure via drinking water.
期刊介绍:
The aims and scope of Current Opinion in Toxicology is to systematically provide the reader with timely and provocative views and opinions of the highest qualified and recognized experts on current advances in selected topics within the field of toxicology. The goal is that Current Opinion in Toxicology will be an invaluable source of information and perspective for researchers, teachers, managers and administrators, policy makers and students. Division of the subject into sections: For this purpose, the scope of Toxicology is divided into six selected high impact themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year: Mechanistic Toxicology, Metabolic Toxicology, Risk assessment in Toxicology, Genomic Toxicology, Systems Toxicology, Translational Toxicology.