No Further Action: Contextualising Social Care Decisions for Children Victimised in Extra-Familial Settings

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
J. Lloyd, C. Firmin
{"title":"No Further Action: Contextualising Social Care Decisions for Children Victimised in Extra-Familial Settings","authors":"J. Lloyd, C. Firmin","doi":"10.1177/1473225419893789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"England’s child protection system is intended to safeguard young people at risk of significant harm – physical, sexual, emotional abuse and neglect. When young people are physically assaulted, stabbed or groomed into drugs trafficking they experience significant harm. To this extent they are entitled to support from statutory child protection services. Using findings from one component of a mixed method multi-site study, data from referrals and assessments into children’s social care is examined to identify the extent to which the right support and protection is realised. Such analysis indicates that despite being at risk of significant harm, young people abused in community or peer, rather than familial, settings will most likely receive a ‘no further action’ decision from social workers following referrals for support. This article suggests that to a certain extent no further action decisions are aligned to the legal and cultural parameters of social work and child protection practice, thus raising questions about the sufficiency of such for safeguarding young people abused in extra-familial settings.","PeriodicalId":45886,"journal":{"name":"Youth Justice-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473225419893789","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Youth Justice-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225419893789","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

England’s child protection system is intended to safeguard young people at risk of significant harm – physical, sexual, emotional abuse and neglect. When young people are physically assaulted, stabbed or groomed into drugs trafficking they experience significant harm. To this extent they are entitled to support from statutory child protection services. Using findings from one component of a mixed method multi-site study, data from referrals and assessments into children’s social care is examined to identify the extent to which the right support and protection is realised. Such analysis indicates that despite being at risk of significant harm, young people abused in community or peer, rather than familial, settings will most likely receive a ‘no further action’ decision from social workers following referrals for support. This article suggests that to a certain extent no further action decisions are aligned to the legal and cultural parameters of social work and child protection practice, thus raising questions about the sufficiency of such for safeguarding young people abused in extra-familial settings.
无需采取进一步行动:将在家庭外环境中受害儿童的社会护理决策具体化
英国的儿童保护制度旨在保护那些面临重大伤害风险的年轻人——身体、性、情感虐待和忽视。当年轻人受到人身攻击、刺伤或被培养成贩毒时,他们会受到重大伤害。在这种程度上,他们有权得到法定儿童保护服务机构的支助。利用混合方法多地点研究的一个组成部分的发现,对儿童社会关怀的转诊和评估数据进行检查,以确定实现正确支持和保护的程度。这样的分析表明,尽管面临严重伤害的风险,但在社区或同伴环境中受到虐待的年轻人,而不是在家庭环境中,在转介寻求支持后,最有可能从社会工作者那里得到“不再采取进一步行动”的决定。这篇文章表明,在某种程度上,没有进一步的行动决定与社会工作和儿童保护实践的法律和文化参数保持一致,从而提出了这样的问题,即在家庭外环境中保护受虐待的年轻人是否足够。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Youth Justice-An International Journal
Youth Justice-An International Journal CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Youth Justice is an international, peer-reviewed journal that engages with the analyses of juvenile/youth justice systems, law, policy and practice around the world. It contains articles that are theoretically informed and/or grounded in the latest empirical research. Youth Justice has established itself as the leading journal in the field in the UK, and, supported by an editorial board comprising some of the world"s leading youth justice scholars.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信