Truth and Complexity: Notes on Music and Liberalism

Q2 Social Sciences
J. Finnis
{"title":"Truth and Complexity: Notes on Music and Liberalism","authors":"J. Finnis","doi":"10.1093/ajj/aux009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Simpson's Political Illiberalism restores to its proper place in political theory Plato's thesis that bad music imperils the whole culture and polity, a thesis ignored with utter recklessness in contemporary liberal practice and, for the most part, theory. But Simpson's elaboration of the thesis over-simplifies the characteristics of Bach's (and later) \"modern\" music that make it dangerous, somewhat in the way that the Providential \"composing\" of human history, with all its complexities, involves discord and danger. One such hazardous complexity is the addition of prophetic divine revelation (\"Jerusalem\") to the achievements of (divinely given) human reason exercised in natural science and philosophy (\"Athens\"). The eventual completion of revelation includes the lapidary \"Render to Caesar ... \" formula, the two poles of which our soi-disant liberal doctrines about public good characteristically reduce to one. These Notes, complementary to Simpson's book, suggest that such a unilateral prioritizing of public peace over truth is inherently prejudicial to the political community's more fundamental common good, a common good prejudiced also by parallel failings at the ecclesiastical pole.","PeriodicalId":39920,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Jurisprudence","volume":"62 1","pages":"119-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ajj/aux009","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/aux009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Simpson's Political Illiberalism restores to its proper place in political theory Plato's thesis that bad music imperils the whole culture and polity, a thesis ignored with utter recklessness in contemporary liberal practice and, for the most part, theory. But Simpson's elaboration of the thesis over-simplifies the characteristics of Bach's (and later) "modern" music that make it dangerous, somewhat in the way that the Providential "composing" of human history, with all its complexities, involves discord and danger. One such hazardous complexity is the addition of prophetic divine revelation ("Jerusalem") to the achievements of (divinely given) human reason exercised in natural science and philosophy ("Athens"). The eventual completion of revelation includes the lapidary "Render to Caesar ... " formula, the two poles of which our soi-disant liberal doctrines about public good characteristically reduce to one. These Notes, complementary to Simpson's book, suggest that such a unilateral prioritizing of public peace over truth is inherently prejudicial to the political community's more fundamental common good, a common good prejudiced also by parallel failings at the ecclesiastical pole.
真理与复杂性:音乐与自由主义札记
辛普森的《政治上的非自由主义》在政治理论中恢复了柏拉图的论点,即糟糕的音乐危及整个文化和政体,这一论点在当代自由主义实践和大部分理论中被完全轻率地忽视了。但辛普森对论文的阐述过于简化了巴赫(以及后来)的特点“现代”音乐使它变得危险,这在某种程度上就像上帝“谱写”人类历史一样,它的复杂性包含着不和谐和危险。其中一个危险的复杂性是,将预言性的神圣启示(“耶路撒冷”)添加到(神赋予的)人类理性在自然科学和哲学(“雅典”)中的成就中。最终完成的启示包括宝石“呈献给凯撒……”“公式,我们关于公共利益的自由主义学说的两个极端,典型地归结为一个。这些笔记是对辛普森的书的补充,表明这种单方面将公共和平置于真理之上的做法,本质上是对政治团体更基本的共同利益的偏见,这种共同利益也被教会方面的类似失败所偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Jurisprudence
American Journal of Jurisprudence Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信