The Concept of polytheism in the Religious Studies as a Result of lingual misunderstanding

O. Shepetyak
{"title":"The Concept of polytheism in the Religious Studies as a Result of lingual misunderstanding","authors":"O. Shepetyak","doi":"10.32420/2019.87.1311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1921 was published the book of the famous Austrian-British philosopher and funder of the analytic philosophy Ludwig Johann Wittgenstein, in which he wrote, that the big part of our philosophical problems, which were subject of the thinking of the thousands philosophers, are created not by the difficulty of reality but by the complication of the language. When a philosopher analyzes a language he uses, he will find that the biggest part of the philosophical problems is illusory. Following Wittgenstein's advices, in this article we probe to analyze what means the concept \"polytheism\" and to answer the questions: did the phenomenon, what is with this word described, anytime exist, or it is only a phantasies' fabrication, and all attempts to think about it are wandering in the dark labyrinths without exit. The first problem we have in our way is absolutely darkness in this question. We could not find any research, in which the concept of polytheism is analyzed in this way we changed. So we must get through the forest of an unknown ourselves without opportunity to have support from the experience of the predecessors. We hope our mistakes might be useful for the following researches. The Greek word \"doxa polytheos\" was first time used by Philo of Alexandria and after them many Judaic and Christian authors repeated this word opposing own religion to the paganism. Jan Bodin 1n 16th Century used this word in the modern mean as a France word \"polythéisme\". The Greek word \"doxa polytheos\" and the France one \"polythéisme\", though they are constructed of the same Greek word \"Θεός\", based on the different concepts, because in 16 centuries the word \"Θεός\" changed its means. In Greek-speaking society this word was used to detonate any being who overstate the material world. When Thales of Millet wrote, that \"the world is full of gods\", he did not mean that there is an Absolut in every small part of the world. When he used the word \"Θεός\" in this mean, Thales thought about different objects, as we called \"God\" now. The mean of the term \"polytheism\" is unclear and is the cause of many researches problems in the religious studies. The Greek word \"Θεός\" detonated every sacral being, which was the object of the worship, but not the Absolut. When this word went in the term \"polytheism\", its mean was changed, and it was used for the calling Absolut in the Christian meaning. This transformation of the meaning created the wrong conception that in the world there were or are religions, the members of them believes in the existence of some or many Absolutes. The problem of using concept \"polytheism\" is not a real academic problem but an illusions problem, what is caused by the wrong and incorrect using of the term. The Greek word \"Θεός\", of them are created the terms \"monotheism\" and \"polytheism\", is used in both terms in different meanings. In the term \"monotheism\" the word \"Θεός\" means God-Absolut, and in the term \"polytheism\" – any beings, what are the objects of the religious worship. The monotheism and polytheism are not two different phase of the entvelopment of the religious consciousness. These ideas are created by the wrongness of Hegel's philosophy and must be uprooted from the lexicon of the religious studies.","PeriodicalId":33427,"journal":{"name":"Ukrayins''ke Peligiieznavstvo","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrayins''ke Peligiieznavstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32420/2019.87.1311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1921 was published the book of the famous Austrian-British philosopher and funder of the analytic philosophy Ludwig Johann Wittgenstein, in which he wrote, that the big part of our philosophical problems, which were subject of the thinking of the thousands philosophers, are created not by the difficulty of reality but by the complication of the language. When a philosopher analyzes a language he uses, he will find that the biggest part of the philosophical problems is illusory. Following Wittgenstein's advices, in this article we probe to analyze what means the concept "polytheism" and to answer the questions: did the phenomenon, what is with this word described, anytime exist, or it is only a phantasies' fabrication, and all attempts to think about it are wandering in the dark labyrinths without exit. The first problem we have in our way is absolutely darkness in this question. We could not find any research, in which the concept of polytheism is analyzed in this way we changed. So we must get through the forest of an unknown ourselves without opportunity to have support from the experience of the predecessors. We hope our mistakes might be useful for the following researches. The Greek word "doxa polytheos" was first time used by Philo of Alexandria and after them many Judaic and Christian authors repeated this word opposing own religion to the paganism. Jan Bodin 1n 16th Century used this word in the modern mean as a France word "polythéisme". The Greek word "doxa polytheos" and the France one "polythéisme", though they are constructed of the same Greek word "Θεός", based on the different concepts, because in 16 centuries the word "Θεός" changed its means. In Greek-speaking society this word was used to detonate any being who overstate the material world. When Thales of Millet wrote, that "the world is full of gods", he did not mean that there is an Absolut in every small part of the world. When he used the word "Θεός" in this mean, Thales thought about different objects, as we called "God" now. The mean of the term "polytheism" is unclear and is the cause of many researches problems in the religious studies. The Greek word "Θεός" detonated every sacral being, which was the object of the worship, but not the Absolut. When this word went in the term "polytheism", its mean was changed, and it was used for the calling Absolut in the Christian meaning. This transformation of the meaning created the wrong conception that in the world there were or are religions, the members of them believes in the existence of some or many Absolutes. The problem of using concept "polytheism" is not a real academic problem but an illusions problem, what is caused by the wrong and incorrect using of the term. The Greek word "Θεός", of them are created the terms "monotheism" and "polytheism", is used in both terms in different meanings. In the term "monotheism" the word "Θεός" means God-Absolut, and in the term "polytheism" – any beings, what are the objects of the religious worship. The monotheism and polytheism are not two different phase of the entvelopment of the religious consciousness. These ideas are created by the wrongness of Hegel's philosophy and must be uprooted from the lexicon of the religious studies.
从语言误解看宗教研究中的多神教概念
1921年出版了著名的奥地利-英国哲学家和分析哲学的创始人路德维希·约翰·维特根斯坦的书,他在书中写道,我们的大部分哲学问题,这些问题是成千上万哲学家思考的主题,不是由现实的困难造成的,而是由语言的复杂性造成的。当哲学家分析他所使用的语言时,他会发现哲学问题的绝大部分是虚幻的。根据维特根斯坦的建议,本文试图分析“多神教”这个概念的含义,并回答这样的问题:这个现象,这个词所描述的是什么,是否曾经存在过,或者它只是一个幻想的虚构,所有对它的思考都是在黑暗的迷宫中徘徊而没有出口。我们遇到的第一个问题是这个问题的绝对黑暗。我们找不到任何研究,以我们改变的方式来分析多神教的概念。所以我们必须自己穿过未知的森林,而没有机会从前人的经验中获得支持。希望我们的错误对后续的研究有所帮助。希腊词“doxa polytheos”是由亚历山大的Philo第一次使用,之后许多犹太教和基督教作家重复这个词来反对异教。16世纪的Jan Bodin在现代的意思中使用这个词作为法语单词“polythsamisme”。希腊词“doxa polytheos”和法国词“polythsamisme”,虽然它们是由同一个希腊词“Θεός”构成的,但基于不同的概念,因为在16世纪,“Θεός”改变了它的意思。在希腊语社会,这个词被用来引爆任何夸大物质世界的人。当米勒的泰勒斯写到“世界充满了神”时,他并不是说在世界的每一个小地方都有一个绝对的存在。当他使用Θεός这个词的时候,泰勒斯想到了不同的对象,也就是我们现在所说的“上帝”。“多神论”一词的含义不明确,是宗教研究中诸多研究问题的根源。希腊词“Θεός”引爆了每一个神圣的存在,这是崇拜的对象,但不是绝对。当这个词出现在“多神论”一词中时,它的意思就改变了,在基督教的意义上,它被用来称呼“绝对”。这种意义的转换产生了一种错误的观念,即世界上曾经有过或现在有宗教,宗教的成员相信存在一些或许多绝对。“多神教”概念的使用问题不是一个真正的学术问题,而是一个错觉问题,这是由于对术语的错误和不正确的使用造成的。希腊单词“Θεός”,其中创造了术语“一神论”和“多神论”,在两个术语中使用不同的含义。在“一神论”中,“Θεός”一词的意思是绝对的神,而在“多神论”中,意思是任何存在,什么是宗教崇拜的对象。一神论和多神论并不是宗教意识发展的两个不同阶段。这些观念是由黑格尔哲学的错误造成的,必须从宗教研究的词汇中根除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书