Outcome of Pneumatic Balloon Dilatation in Achalasia Cardia

Shankar Baral, B. Paudel, Ajit Khanal, J. Thapa, B. Yadhav, Ramila Shrestha, B. Basnet, M. S. Paudel, S. Thapa, Dibas Khadka, Manoj Shah, U. Shrestha
{"title":"Outcome of Pneumatic Balloon Dilatation in Achalasia Cardia","authors":"Shankar Baral, B. Paudel, Ajit Khanal, J. Thapa, B. Yadhav, Ramila Shrestha, B. Basnet, M. S. Paudel, S. Thapa, Dibas Khadka, Manoj Shah, U. Shrestha","doi":"10.3126/JAIM.V10I1.37083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Achalasia Cardia is a rare esophageal motility disorder. Among various treatment options, Pneumatic Dilatation (PD) is the most widely used and cost effective modality till date. This is the first observational study aiming to evaluate the short term response and complications of PD for Achalasia Cardia in Nepal. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted between 28th Jan 2020 to 27th Jan 2021. It included 39 patients with Achalasia Cardia diagnosed by clinical presentation, esophagoscopy, barium esophagogram and high resolution manometry. Two patients of Type III achalasia were excluded from study. Thirty seven patients underwent pneumatic dilatation with 30 mm Rigiflex balloon (Boston Scientific, USA) for a duration of 1 minute. Response was assessed by Eckardts score at 3 and 6 months. Result: Among 39 cases (mean age= 39.03±15.017 years, 59% men), commonest was Type II Achalasia (71.8%) followed by Type I (23.1%) and Type III (5.1%). Dysphagia was present in all patients (100%), followed by weight loss (84.6%), regurgitation (79.5%) and chest pain (35.9%). Mean basal Eckardts score and Lower Esophageal Sphincter pressure of the study population was 7.81±1.24 and 24.40±6.83 respectively. Response to pneumatic dilatation was 89.2%. Eckardts score changed significantly from7.81±1.24 to 1.03±1.82 at 6 months (p<0.001). None of the patients had major complications. Younger age (23±6.377 years) had poor response to treatment, while predilatation Lower Esophageal Sphincter pressure, gender and type of achalasia did not affect the treatment outcome. Conclusion: PD is safe and effective treatment modality for Achalasia. Younger patients have poor response to treatment with Pneumatic Dilatation. Shankar Baral1*, Bidhan Nidhi Paudel1, Ajit Khanal1, Jiwan Thapa1, Bhuwneshwer Yadhav1, Ramila Shrestha1, Bhupendra Kumar Basnet1, Mukesh Sharma Paudel1, Suresh Thapa2, Dibas Khadka1, Manoj Kumar Shah1, Umid Kumar Shrestha3","PeriodicalId":75443,"journal":{"name":"Advances in internal medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"8-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in internal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/JAIM.V10I1.37083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Achalasia Cardia is a rare esophageal motility disorder. Among various treatment options, Pneumatic Dilatation (PD) is the most widely used and cost effective modality till date. This is the first observational study aiming to evaluate the short term response and complications of PD for Achalasia Cardia in Nepal. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted between 28th Jan 2020 to 27th Jan 2021. It included 39 patients with Achalasia Cardia diagnosed by clinical presentation, esophagoscopy, barium esophagogram and high resolution manometry. Two patients of Type III achalasia were excluded from study. Thirty seven patients underwent pneumatic dilatation with 30 mm Rigiflex balloon (Boston Scientific, USA) for a duration of 1 minute. Response was assessed by Eckardts score at 3 and 6 months. Result: Among 39 cases (mean age= 39.03±15.017 years, 59% men), commonest was Type II Achalasia (71.8%) followed by Type I (23.1%) and Type III (5.1%). Dysphagia was present in all patients (100%), followed by weight loss (84.6%), regurgitation (79.5%) and chest pain (35.9%). Mean basal Eckardts score and Lower Esophageal Sphincter pressure of the study population was 7.81±1.24 and 24.40±6.83 respectively. Response to pneumatic dilatation was 89.2%. Eckardts score changed significantly from7.81±1.24 to 1.03±1.82 at 6 months (p<0.001). None of the patients had major complications. Younger age (23±6.377 years) had poor response to treatment, while predilatation Lower Esophageal Sphincter pressure, gender and type of achalasia did not affect the treatment outcome. Conclusion: PD is safe and effective treatment modality for Achalasia. Younger patients have poor response to treatment with Pneumatic Dilatation. Shankar Baral1*, Bidhan Nidhi Paudel1, Ajit Khanal1, Jiwan Thapa1, Bhuwneshwer Yadhav1, Ramila Shrestha1, Bhupendra Kumar Basnet1, Mukesh Sharma Paudel1, Suresh Thapa2, Dibas Khadka1, Manoj Kumar Shah1, Umid Kumar Shrestha3
贲门失弛缓症充气球囊扩张术的疗效
背景:贲门失弛缓症是一种罕见的食管运动障碍。在各种治疗方案中,气动扩张(PD)是迄今为止使用最广泛、成本效益最高的治疗方式。这是第一项旨在评估尼泊尔贲门失弛缓症PD的短期反应和并发症的观察性研究。方法:这项前瞻性观察性研究于2020年1月28日至2021年1月27日进行。包括39例贲门失弛缓症患者,通过临床表现、食管镜检查、钡食管造影和高分辨率测压术进行诊断。两名III型贲门失弛缓症患者被排除在研究之外。37名患者使用30 mm Rigiflex球囊(美国波士顿科学公司)进行了持续1分钟的气动扩张。在3个月和6个月时通过Eckardts评分评估反应。结果:39例(平均年龄39.03±15.017岁,男性59%)中,最常见的是II型失弛缓症(71.8%),其次是I型(23.1%)和III型(5.1%),研究人群的平均基础Eccardts评分和食管下括约肌压分别为7.81±1.24和24.40±6.83。对气动扩张的反应为89.2%。Eckardts评分在6个月时从7.81±1.24显著变化为1.03±1.82(p<0.001)。无严重并发症。年龄较小(23±6.377岁)的患者对治疗的反应较差,而扩张前食管下括约肌压力、性别和贲门失弛缓症类型不影响治疗结果。结论:PD是治疗贲门失弛缓症安全有效的治疗方法。年轻患者对气动扩张治疗反应不佳。Shankar Baral1*、Bidhan Nidhi Paudel 1、Ajit Khanal1、Jiwan Thapa1、Bhuwneshwer Yadhav1、Ramila Shresth1、Bhundra Kumar Basnet1、Mukesh Sharma Paudel、Suresh Thapa2、Dibas Khadka1、Manoj Kumar Shah1、Umid Kumar Shresth3
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信