{"title":"The Appalachian Just Transition and Food Access Initiatives: Two Case Studies from Central Appalachia","authors":"A. Higgins, E. Engle","doi":"10.1353/sgo.2022.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>highlights:</p><list list-type=\"bullet\"><list-item><label>•</label><p>Examines local food systems within context of community and economic development policy</p></list-item><list-item><label>•</label><p>Appraises two Central Appalachia food initiatives through Appalachian Just Transition framework</p></list-item><list-item><label>•</label><p>Constraints from overall context and organizational approaches lead to slippages between Transition principles and initiative outcomes.</p></list-item><list-item><label>•</label><p>Argues for and demonstrates evaluative approach for food systems-driven Transition activities</p></list-item></list><p>abstract:</p><p>Central Appalachia has a continued history of environmental, economic, and political dispossession, leading to uneven development, pollution, and specific issues around food access. A movement addressing the environmental degradation of non-renewable resources, labor issues, economic regeneration, and community health is that of the Appalachian Transition. This Transition also follows the discourse of the larger “Just Transition” movement, calling for grassroots changes towards equitable distribution of resources and power. In this paper, we use two case studies of Central Appalachian food initiatives that encompass both community-based gardening and produce prescription programs. We consider whether these local food initiatives actually realize the promise of economic, environmental, and social justice, alongside questions of the framing and alignment of the “Just” Appalachian Transition itself. This paper ends with recommendations for an evaluative approach for food systems-driven transition activities, alongside considerations around funder implications that can hinder or support organizations in realizing a “just” transition through their work.</p>","PeriodicalId":45528,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Geographer","volume":"62 1","pages":"231 - 252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeastern Geographer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2022.0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
highlights:
Examines local food systems within context of community and economic development policy
Appraises two Central Appalachia food initiatives through Appalachian Just Transition framework
Constraints from overall context and organizational approaches lead to slippages between Transition principles and initiative outcomes.
Argues for and demonstrates evaluative approach for food systems-driven Transition activities
abstract:
Central Appalachia has a continued history of environmental, economic, and political dispossession, leading to uneven development, pollution, and specific issues around food access. A movement addressing the environmental degradation of non-renewable resources, labor issues, economic regeneration, and community health is that of the Appalachian Transition. This Transition also follows the discourse of the larger “Just Transition” movement, calling for grassroots changes towards equitable distribution of resources and power. In this paper, we use two case studies of Central Appalachian food initiatives that encompass both community-based gardening and produce prescription programs. We consider whether these local food initiatives actually realize the promise of economic, environmental, and social justice, alongside questions of the framing and alignment of the “Just” Appalachian Transition itself. This paper ends with recommendations for an evaluative approach for food systems-driven transition activities, alongside considerations around funder implications that can hinder or support organizations in realizing a “just” transition through their work.
期刊介绍:
The Southeastern Geographer is a biannual publication of the Southeastern Division of Association of American Geographers. The journal has published the academic work of geographers and other social and physical scientists since 1961. Peer-reviewed articles and essays are published along with book reviews, organization and conference reports, and commentaries. The journal welcomes manuscripts on any geographical subject as long as it reflects sound scholarship and contains significant contributions to geographical understanding.