Using quality improvement to tackle the triple aim for children and young people with asthma: improving outcomes, experience and costs

Abstract

Asthma in children and young people represents a substantial burden to the healthcare system, with these patients requiring frequent emergency care and having poorer health outcomes, leading to high system costs and poor patient experiences. This study used quality improvement methodology to achieve the triple aim of improved outcomes, better experience and reduced costs for those aged 0–16 years with asthma in north east London. A multidisciplinary project team used quality improvement methods to implement and assess two interventions: a community high-risk asthma clinic and educational asthma-friendly school groups, both of which were delivered by a specialist asthma nurse. Population-level outcomes included asthma control test scores, accident and emergency department admissions and costs. Intervention-specific outcomes included number of clinic consultations delivered, did-not-attend rates and participant confidence ratings following the school sessions. Accident and emergency admissions for asthma reduced by 52%, with a 50% reduction in average monthly acute care costs. Asthma control test scores improved significantly, from an average of 18.56 to 22.34 out of a maximum score of 25 (P=0.000) following the interventions. Participants in the asthma-friendly school groups reported increased confidence in both day-to-day and emergency asthma management at the end of their sessions. Having dedicated specialist asthma nurse input in the community and using school-based interventions can help to improve asthma care for children and young people, reducing the burden of frequent accident and emergency department admissions. Using quality improvement methods in pursuit of triple aim outcomes can help teams to work towards a shared goal.