Job satisfaction versus job engagement: A comparative analysis on perceptions of accountability and turnover

Q2 Social Sciences
Dennis M. Daley
{"title":"Job satisfaction versus job engagement: A comparative analysis on perceptions of accountability and turnover","authors":"Dennis M. Daley","doi":"10.1108/IJOTB-20-02-2017-B002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Job satisfaction assesses extrinsic and intrinsic motivation, leading to productivity. Job engagement internalizes an organizationʼs mission. Job engagement focuses an individualʼs efforts towards achieving meaningful results. Conceptually, job engagement must (1) establish the link between job engagement and organizational outcomes and (2) offer substantially more than currently provided by job satisfaction. Job engagement must be better than a common placebo or only a marginal improvement over job satisfaction. The Federal Employee View Survey (2013) includes global satisfaction and Job engagement indexes. Job satisfaction and job engagement are used as independent variables linked to productivity outcomes (accountability) and exit (intent to leave). Global satisfaction clearly provides a useful measure for productivity outcomes and exit. Job engagement adds usefully with regard to the accountability productivity outcome. However, using both constructs introduces redundancy.","PeriodicalId":35239,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior","volume":"20 1","pages":"161-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJOTB-20-02-2017-B002","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-20-02-2017-B002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Job satisfaction assesses extrinsic and intrinsic motivation, leading to productivity. Job engagement internalizes an organizationʼs mission. Job engagement focuses an individualʼs efforts towards achieving meaningful results. Conceptually, job engagement must (1) establish the link between job engagement and organizational outcomes and (2) offer substantially more than currently provided by job satisfaction. Job engagement must be better than a common placebo or only a marginal improvement over job satisfaction. The Federal Employee View Survey (2013) includes global satisfaction and Job engagement indexes. Job satisfaction and job engagement are used as independent variables linked to productivity outcomes (accountability) and exit (intent to leave). Global satisfaction clearly provides a useful measure for productivity outcomes and exit. Job engagement adds usefully with regard to the accountability productivity outcome. However, using both constructs introduces redundancy.
工作满意度与工作敬业度:对责任感和离职率的比较分析
工作满意度评估导致生产力的外在动机和内在动机。工作投入内化了一个组织的使命。工作投入是指个人为取得有意义的结果所付出的努力。从概念上讲,工作敬业度必须(1)建立工作敬业度与组织成果之间的联系;(2)提供比目前工作满意度多得多的东西。工作投入必须比普通的安慰剂更好,或者仅仅比工作满意度有些微的提高。联邦雇员观点调查(2013)包括全球满意度和工作投入指数。工作满意度和工作投入被用作与生产力结果(问责制)和退出(离职意图)相关的独立变量。全球满意度显然为生产率结果和退出提供了一个有用的衡量标准。工作投入有助于提高问责制和生产力。然而,使用这两种结构会引入冗余。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior
International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior brings together researchers and practitioners, both within and outside the United States, who are in the areas of organization theory, management, development, and behavior. This journal covers all private, public and not-for-profit organizations’ theories and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信