Simultaneously and sequentially presented arrays evoke similar visual working memory crowding

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Harun Yörük, Benjamin J. Tamber-Rosenau
{"title":"Simultaneously and sequentially presented arrays evoke similar visual working memory crowding","authors":"Harun Yörük, Benjamin J. Tamber-Rosenau","doi":"10.1080/13506285.2022.2099497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In visual crowding, an item representation is degraded by adjacent flanker items. Recently, the related phenomenon of visual working memory (VWM) crowding has been used to evaluate shared mechanisms between memory and perception. However, some previous studies that investigated VWM crowding suggested that it stemmed from encoding, rather than memory maintenance. In the current study, we evaluated two measures in simultaneously-presented arrays: anisotropy for radially vs. tangentially configured arrays, and effect of target to array proximity (array middle vs. edge targets). Simultaneously presented arrays evoked effects in both measures. We then compared the data from the current study to that from our previous study that used sequential presentation, and thus avoided encoding-based explanations for crowding. We predicted that we would observe greater crowding for simultaneous than sequential presentation because simultaneous arrays allow for two opportunities for crowding—encoding and maintenance—while sequential arrays only allow for maintenance-based crowding. Surprisingly, we observed that both measures were similar across simultaneous and sequential arrays. These results indicate that VWM crowding does not have an additive error mechanism across encoding and maintenance. Moreover, the anisotropy result suggests that both simultaneous and sequential array VWM crowding is influenced by retinotopy in the early visual cortex.","PeriodicalId":47961,"journal":{"name":"VISUAL COGNITION","volume":"30 1","pages":"490 - 505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VISUAL COGNITION","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2022.2099497","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In visual crowding, an item representation is degraded by adjacent flanker items. Recently, the related phenomenon of visual working memory (VWM) crowding has been used to evaluate shared mechanisms between memory and perception. However, some previous studies that investigated VWM crowding suggested that it stemmed from encoding, rather than memory maintenance. In the current study, we evaluated two measures in simultaneously-presented arrays: anisotropy for radially vs. tangentially configured arrays, and effect of target to array proximity (array middle vs. edge targets). Simultaneously presented arrays evoked effects in both measures. We then compared the data from the current study to that from our previous study that used sequential presentation, and thus avoided encoding-based explanations for crowding. We predicted that we would observe greater crowding for simultaneous than sequential presentation because simultaneous arrays allow for two opportunities for crowding—encoding and maintenance—while sequential arrays only allow for maintenance-based crowding. Surprisingly, we observed that both measures were similar across simultaneous and sequential arrays. These results indicate that VWM crowding does not have an additive error mechanism across encoding and maintenance. Moreover, the anisotropy result suggests that both simultaneous and sequential array VWM crowding is influenced by retinotopy in the early visual cortex.
同时和顺序呈现的阵列唤起了类似的视觉工作记忆拥挤
在视觉拥挤中,一个项目的表示被相邻的侧边项目所退化。近年来,视觉工作记忆拥挤现象被用来评价记忆和知觉之间的共享机制。然而,之前一些关于VWM拥挤的研究表明,它源于编码,而不是记忆维护。在当前的研究中,我们评估了同时呈现阵列的两种测量方法:径向与切向配置阵列的各向异性,以及目标与阵列接近度的影响(阵列中间目标与边缘目标)。同时呈现的阵列在两种测量中均引起效应。然后,我们将当前研究的数据与之前使用顺序呈现的研究的数据进行了比较,从而避免了基于编码的拥挤解释。我们预测,同步呈现会比顺序呈现更拥挤,因为同步数组允许两个拥挤的机会——编码和维护——而顺序数组只允许基于维护的拥挤。令人惊讶的是,我们观察到这两种测量方法在同步和顺序数组中是相似的。这些结果表明,VWM拥挤在编码和维护过程中不存在加性误差机制。此外,各向异性结果表明,同时和顺序排列的VWM拥挤都受到早期视觉皮层视网膜切除的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
VISUAL COGNITION
VISUAL COGNITION PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Visual Cognition publishes new empirical research that increases theoretical understanding of human visual cognition. Studies may be concerned with any aspect of visual cognition such as object, face, and scene recognition; visual attention and search; short-term and long-term visual memory; visual word recognition and reading; eye movement control and active vision; and visual imagery. The journal is devoted to research at the interface of visual perception and cognition and does not typically publish papers in areas of perception or psychophysics that are covered by the many publication outlets for those topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信