M. Robert, K. Best, M. Hebinck, Roxanne Périnet-Lacroix, Ueli Albert, K. Arbour-Nicitopoulos, M. Labbe, Alexis Boulenger, C. Batcho, D. Maltais, P. Rushton
{"title":"Education and Measurement are the Top Priorities to Advance Physical Literacy for Individuals with Physical Disabilities","authors":"M. Robert, K. Best, M. Hebinck, Roxanne Périnet-Lacroix, Ueli Albert, K. Arbour-Nicitopoulos, M. Labbe, Alexis Boulenger, C. Batcho, D. Maltais, P. Rushton","doi":"10.5334/paah.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Most individuals with physical disabilities do not meet physical activity recommendations, which may negatively impact quality of life. Physical literacy is a concept that considers the key elements necessary to support lifelong physical activity. Limited attention has been directed towards physical literacy for individuals with physical disabilities.\nObjectives: To obtain expert consensus on strategic priorities to delineate the next steps on physical literacy for individuals with physical disabilities.\nMethods: The Collaborative Prioritized Planning Process was followed during a two-day online consensus meeting with experts in disability and physical activity. This systematic four-step process involved: 1) knowledge synthesis before the meeting, 2) challenge identification and prioritization, 3) solution identification, consolidation and prioritization, and 4) action planning.\nResults: Thirty-one experts participated in the meeting. Five challenges related to physical literacy for individuals with physical disabilities were prioritized. The following solutions were suggested: developing a massive online open course, creating a physical literacy measurement toolkit, developing a physical literacy resource portal, creating a national database of physical literacy outcomes, and redefining an existing international consensus statement for physical literacy to be more inclusive.\nConclusions: Collaborations between experts are needed to advance the research in physical literacy for people with disabilities through education and measurement.","PeriodicalId":32633,"journal":{"name":"Physical Activity and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Activity and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/paah.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Most individuals with physical disabilities do not meet physical activity recommendations, which may negatively impact quality of life. Physical literacy is a concept that considers the key elements necessary to support lifelong physical activity. Limited attention has been directed towards physical literacy for individuals with physical disabilities.
Objectives: To obtain expert consensus on strategic priorities to delineate the next steps on physical literacy for individuals with physical disabilities.
Methods: The Collaborative Prioritized Planning Process was followed during a two-day online consensus meeting with experts in disability and physical activity. This systematic four-step process involved: 1) knowledge synthesis before the meeting, 2) challenge identification and prioritization, 3) solution identification, consolidation and prioritization, and 4) action planning.
Results: Thirty-one experts participated in the meeting. Five challenges related to physical literacy for individuals with physical disabilities were prioritized. The following solutions were suggested: developing a massive online open course, creating a physical literacy measurement toolkit, developing a physical literacy resource portal, creating a national database of physical literacy outcomes, and redefining an existing international consensus statement for physical literacy to be more inclusive.
Conclusions: Collaborations between experts are needed to advance the research in physical literacy for people with disabilities through education and measurement.