Promoting Gender Equity in Livelihoods Projects: Practitioners’ Perspectives Through the Lens of a Socio-ecological Model

IF 1.7 4区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
R. Serra, Michelle L Kendall, Alexandra M. Towns, James Hummer
{"title":"Promoting Gender Equity in Livelihoods Projects: Practitioners’ Perspectives Through the Lens of a Socio-ecological Model","authors":"R. Serra, Michelle L Kendall, Alexandra M. Towns, James Hummer","doi":"10.1177/14649934221129427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article points to the untapped potential for meaningful and mutually beneficial exchange between development research and practice, by presenting an example of an iterative process of knowledge formation, whereby project staff’s collective experiential insights and inductive learning are used to obtain an enriched Socio-ecological Model (SEM), which is attuned to the lived experiences in the field and is reinforced by the available research evidence. Using Catholic Relief Services, one of the largest humanitarian and development organizations worldwide, as case study, interviews were conducted with project staff from nine livelihood and food security projects and gathered staff’s perceptions and experiences with promoting gender-equitable outcomes through improved intra-household gender dynamics and men’s involvement. The qualitative analysis of the interviews shows that, while projects tried to integrate activities across the four levels of the SEM (individual, family, community and societal), staff perceived that the stickiness of social norms, women’s time poverty and limited buy-in from local organizations affected progress and presented new challenges that required constant adaptation. Our proposed method shows how an SEM can be enriched by incorporating these additional elements and by using existing research to confirm the significance of the exercise. An enriched SEM, by explicitly pointing to cross-cutting challenges that emerge from the field, is better reflective of the realities in which the staff works than a simple SEM. A process of SEM’s validation through incorporating insights from field staff and collaboratively involving researchers has the potential to deepen how projects or organizations think about the way they can foster gender transformative change; as well as to lead to more informed research and enhance researchers’ appreciations of the practical nature of development project challenges.","PeriodicalId":47042,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Development Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":"82 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934221129427","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article points to the untapped potential for meaningful and mutually beneficial exchange between development research and practice, by presenting an example of an iterative process of knowledge formation, whereby project staff’s collective experiential insights and inductive learning are used to obtain an enriched Socio-ecological Model (SEM), which is attuned to the lived experiences in the field and is reinforced by the available research evidence. Using Catholic Relief Services, one of the largest humanitarian and development organizations worldwide, as case study, interviews were conducted with project staff from nine livelihood and food security projects and gathered staff’s perceptions and experiences with promoting gender-equitable outcomes through improved intra-household gender dynamics and men’s involvement. The qualitative analysis of the interviews shows that, while projects tried to integrate activities across the four levels of the SEM (individual, family, community and societal), staff perceived that the stickiness of social norms, women’s time poverty and limited buy-in from local organizations affected progress and presented new challenges that required constant adaptation. Our proposed method shows how an SEM can be enriched by incorporating these additional elements and by using existing research to confirm the significance of the exercise. An enriched SEM, by explicitly pointing to cross-cutting challenges that emerge from the field, is better reflective of the realities in which the staff works than a simple SEM. A process of SEM’s validation through incorporating insights from field staff and collaboratively involving researchers has the potential to deepen how projects or organizations think about the way they can foster gender transformative change; as well as to lead to more informed research and enhance researchers’ appreciations of the practical nature of development project challenges.
促进生计项目中的性别平等:从社会生态模式的视角看从业者的观点
本文通过展示一个知识形成的迭代过程的例子,指出了发展研究和实践之间进行有意义和互利交流的未开发潜力,通过该过程,项目工作人员的集体经验见解和归纳学习被用来获得丰富的社会生态模型(SEM),这与该领域的生活经历相适应,并通过现有的研究证据得到了加强。利用世界上最大的人道主义和发展组织之一天主教救济服务作为案例研究,采访了来自九个生计和粮食安全项目的项目工作人员,收集了工作人员对通过改善家庭内部性别动态和男性参与来促进性别公平结果的看法和经验。访谈的定性分析表明,虽然项目试图整合SEM四个层面(个人、家庭、社区和社会)的活动,但工作人员认为,社会规范的粘性、妇女的时间贫困和地方组织的有限支持影响了进展,并提出了需要不断适应的新挑战。我们提出的方法展示了如何通过结合这些额外的元素并利用现有的研究来确认练习的重要性来丰富SEM。一个丰富的SEM,通过明确指出该领域出现的交叉挑战,比一个简单的SEM更能反映员工工作的现实。通过吸收实地工作人员的见解并与研究人员合作,SEM的验证过程有可能加深项目或组织对如何促进性别变革的思考;以及引导更知情的研究,提高研究人员对开发项目挑战的实践性质的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Development Studies
Progress in Development Studies DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Progress in Development Studies is an exciting new forum for the discussion of development issues, ranging from: · Poverty alleviation and international aid · The international debt crisis · Economic development and industrialization · Environmental degradation and sustainable development · Political governance and civil society · Gender relations · The rights of the child
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信