Invasive Physiotherapy as a Treatment of Spasticity: A Systematic Review

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alberto Javier-Ormazábal, M. González-Platas, Elena González-Sierra, Marta González-Sierra
{"title":"Invasive Physiotherapy as a Treatment of Spasticity: A Systematic Review","authors":"Alberto Javier-Ormazábal, M. González-Platas, Elena González-Sierra, Marta González-Sierra","doi":"10.2147/DNND.S350192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Nowadays, a set of novel physiotherapy techniques have emerged, in which the physical agent used to try to reduce spasticity is applied percutaneously, specifically, through the patient’s skin. The aim of this work is to encompass all the invasive techniques used in spasticity in a single article, updating the existing bibliography. Methodology A systematic review was carried out between December 2020 and April 2021 in the Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed databases, selecting the clinical trials that used acupuncture, electroacupuncture or dry needling as a treatment for spasticity. Sixteen clinical trials were included, summarizing all the study characteristics and the outcome measures, at last the evidence was described for their results. Results Most of the studies find a difference of significant decrease in spasticity between the subjects of the experimental groups. Only four studies found no significant changes in spasticity. All the studies are carried out together with the conventional physiotherapy treatment in spasticity. Conclusion Treatment with invasive physiotherapy, combined with conventional physiotherapy, seems to have positive effects in reducing spasticity, although more studies are needed to improve the heterogeneity of the interventions and to assess their long-term effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":93972,"journal":{"name":"Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DNND.S350192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction Nowadays, a set of novel physiotherapy techniques have emerged, in which the physical agent used to try to reduce spasticity is applied percutaneously, specifically, through the patient’s skin. The aim of this work is to encompass all the invasive techniques used in spasticity in a single article, updating the existing bibliography. Methodology A systematic review was carried out between December 2020 and April 2021 in the Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed databases, selecting the clinical trials that used acupuncture, electroacupuncture or dry needling as a treatment for spasticity. Sixteen clinical trials were included, summarizing all the study characteristics and the outcome measures, at last the evidence was described for their results. Results Most of the studies find a difference of significant decrease in spasticity between the subjects of the experimental groups. Only four studies found no significant changes in spasticity. All the studies are carried out together with the conventional physiotherapy treatment in spasticity. Conclusion Treatment with invasive physiotherapy, combined with conventional physiotherapy, seems to have positive effects in reducing spasticity, although more studies are needed to improve the heterogeneity of the interventions and to assess their long-term effectiveness.
侵入性物理疗法治疗痉挛:系统综述
引言如今,出现了一套新的物理治疗技术,其中用于减少痉挛的物理制剂是经皮应用的,特别是通过患者的皮肤。这项工作的目的是在一篇文章中涵盖痉挛症中使用的所有侵入性技术,更新现有的参考文献。方法在2020年12月至2021年4月期间,在Web of Science、Scopus和PubMed数据库中进行了一项系统综述,选择了使用针灸、电针或干针治疗痉挛的临床试验。纳入了16项临床试验,总结了所有研究特征和结果指标,最后描述了其结果的证据。结果大多数研究发现,实验组受试者的痉挛程度显著降低。只有四项研究发现痉挛状态没有显著变化。所有的研究都是与痉挛的常规物理治疗一起进行的。结论侵入性物理治疗与常规物理治疗相结合,在减少痉挛方面似乎有积极作用,尽管还需要更多的研究来改善干预措施的异质性并评估其长期有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信