Systematic review: Risk factors and mechanisms of radicalization in lone-actor grievance-fueled violence

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Christopher Kehlet Ebbrecht
{"title":"Systematic review: Risk factors and mechanisms of radicalization in lone-actor grievance-fueled violence","authors":"Christopher Kehlet Ebbrecht","doi":"10.1080/19012276.2022.2074524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this systematic review is to identify risk factors and mechanisms of radicalization associated with lone-actor grievance-fueled violence. In this paper, I focus on five violent lone-actor “types”; lone-actor terrorists, workplace attackers, school shooters, rampage shooters and violent Incels. Data synthesis of the 78 included studies led to the identification of nine risk factors: 1) sociodemographic background; 2) social ties; 3) interpersonal rejection; 4) mental illness; 5) subclinical personality traits; 6) strain; 7) grievances; 8) emotional traits and states; and 9) cognitive processes and content. As a limitation of the extant literature is the lack of a coherent and integrative framework of how each factor relates to the others, findings were re-synthesized to show how risk factors essentially reflect five generic social and psychological mechanisms of radicalization: socialization, small-group dynamics, psychological need restoration, mental health from a dimensional perspective, and mechanisms of moral disengagement. The paper ends with a discussion of this framework and its implications for future research on lone-actor grievance-fueled violence.","PeriodicalId":51815,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2022.2074524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this systematic review is to identify risk factors and mechanisms of radicalization associated with lone-actor grievance-fueled violence. In this paper, I focus on five violent lone-actor “types”; lone-actor terrorists, workplace attackers, school shooters, rampage shooters and violent Incels. Data synthesis of the 78 included studies led to the identification of nine risk factors: 1) sociodemographic background; 2) social ties; 3) interpersonal rejection; 4) mental illness; 5) subclinical personality traits; 6) strain; 7) grievances; 8) emotional traits and states; and 9) cognitive processes and content. As a limitation of the extant literature is the lack of a coherent and integrative framework of how each factor relates to the others, findings were re-synthesized to show how risk factors essentially reflect five generic social and psychological mechanisms of radicalization: socialization, small-group dynamics, psychological need restoration, mental health from a dimensional perspective, and mechanisms of moral disengagement. The paper ends with a discussion of this framework and its implications for future research on lone-actor grievance-fueled violence.
系统综述:因不满引发的暴力行为中激进化的风险因素和机制
本系统综述的目的是识别与孤独行为者怨恨引发的暴力相关的激进化风险因素和机制。在本文中,我重点研究了五种暴力孤独演员“类型”;单枪匹马的恐怖分子、工作场所袭击者、学校枪手、横冲直撞的枪手和暴力分子。对纳入的78项研究进行数据综合,确定了9个风险因素:1)社会人口背景;2)社会关系;3)人际排斥;4)精神疾病;5)亚临床人格特征;6)应变;7)不满;8)情绪特征与状态;9)认知过程与内容。由于现有文献的局限性是缺乏一个连贯和综合的框架来说明每个因素如何与其他因素相关,研究结果被重新综合,以显示风险因素如何本质上反映激进化的五种一般社会和心理机制:社会化、小团体动力学、心理需求恢复、从维度角度看心理健康和道德脱离机制。本文最后讨论了这一框架及其对未来研究孤独行为者怨恨引发的暴力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nordic Psychology
Nordic Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信