The Compatibility of Confucianism and Law

Sophia Gao, Aaron J. Walayat
{"title":"The Compatibility of Confucianism and Law","authors":"Sophia Gao, Aaron J. Walayat","doi":"10.58948/2331-3528.2028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is initially odd to ask whether Confucianism is compatible with systems of law. Confucian thought has co-existed with Chinese legal systems throughout the various dynasties of China’s long history. Nevertheless, despite the extensive laws that China has boasted, traditional Chinese legal thought is not typically recognized as a genuine rule-of-law system, given its focus on moral development and the “rule of man.” In this essay, we argue that Confucianism, specifically Pre-Qin Confucianism, is compatible with the rule-of-law. We examine the different models of compatibility, including “soft compatibilism” in which we examine whether abstract concepts between Confucianism and legal systems are compatible, as well as co-existing and integrating compatibilism. Co-existing compatibilism sees Confucianism and the law occupying different spheres within the same legal system while integrating compatibilism sees Confucianism and the law coming together into a new system. In this way, Confucianism offers China an alternative to liberal democratic and Marxist theories of law. 1. Sophia Gao is a Ph.D. Student at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Sophia Gao’s email is the following: gao_feiyan@foxmail.com. 2. Aaron J. Walayat, Judicial Law Clerk, Hon. William S. Stickman IV, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. Aaron J. Walayat’s email is the following: aaronjwalayat@gmail.com.","PeriodicalId":82250,"journal":{"name":"Pace law review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58948/2331-3528.2028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is initially odd to ask whether Confucianism is compatible with systems of law. Confucian thought has co-existed with Chinese legal systems throughout the various dynasties of China’s long history. Nevertheless, despite the extensive laws that China has boasted, traditional Chinese legal thought is not typically recognized as a genuine rule-of-law system, given its focus on moral development and the “rule of man.” In this essay, we argue that Confucianism, specifically Pre-Qin Confucianism, is compatible with the rule-of-law. We examine the different models of compatibility, including “soft compatibilism” in which we examine whether abstract concepts between Confucianism and legal systems are compatible, as well as co-existing and integrating compatibilism. Co-existing compatibilism sees Confucianism and the law occupying different spheres within the same legal system while integrating compatibilism sees Confucianism and the law coming together into a new system. In this way, Confucianism offers China an alternative to liberal democratic and Marxist theories of law. 1. Sophia Gao is a Ph.D. Student at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Sophia Gao’s email is the following: gao_feiyan@foxmail.com. 2. Aaron J. Walayat, Judicial Law Clerk, Hon. William S. Stickman IV, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. Aaron J. Walayat’s email is the following: aaronjwalayat@gmail.com.
儒学与法律的契合性
问儒学是否与法律体系相容,一开始是奇怪的。在中国漫长的历史长河中,儒家思想一直与中国的法律制度共存。然而,尽管中国拥有广泛的法律,传统的中国法律思想通常不被认为是一个真正的法治体系,因为它关注道德发展和“人治”。在本文中,我们认为儒家思想,特别是先秦儒家思想,是与法治相容的。我们研究了不同的相容模式,包括“软相容”,其中我们研究儒家和法律体系之间的抽象概念是否相容,以及共存和整合相容。共存相容论认为儒学和法律在同一法律体系中占据不同的领域,而整合相容论认为儒学和法律在一个新的体系中融合在一起。通过这种方式,儒学为中国提供了自由民主和马克思主义法律理论之外的另一种选择。1. Sophia Gao是澳大利亚悉尼新南威尔士大学的博士生。Sophia Gao的邮箱如下:gao_feiyan@foxmail.com。2. 亚伦·j·瓦拉亚特,司法书记,威廉·s·斯蒂克曼四世法官,美国宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡市美国宾夕法尼亚州西区地方法院。Aaron J. Walayat的电子邮件地址如下:aaronjwalayat@gmail.com。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书