Reading the Mind in the Eyes: Theory of Mind in Acute Psychosis and Schizophrenia

Q3 Medicine
Reem H. El Ghamry, Hanan Mohamed Ezzeldin Azzam, Moustafa Mohamed Mohamed Abdo, Rehab Naguib
{"title":"Reading the Mind in the Eyes: Theory of Mind in Acute Psychosis and Schizophrenia","authors":"Reem H. El Ghamry, Hanan Mohamed Ezzeldin Azzam, Moustafa Mohamed Mohamed Abdo, Rehab Naguib","doi":"10.20471/may.2022.58.01.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correspondence to: Reem Hassan El Ghamry, MD, MRCPych 8 Mugamaa El Ferdous, Nasr St., 11471 Cairo, Egypt Phone: + 20 100 660 31 84 E-mail: reemelghamry@hotmail.com Copyright © 2022 KBCSM, Zagreb e-mail: apr.kbcsm@gmail.com • www.http://apr.kbcsm.hr Abstract Background: The extant literature indicates that patients with acute psychosis or schizophrenia, as well as nonpsychotic first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia, all exhibit “Theory of Mind” (TOM) impairments. Objective: To assess TOM functioning and identify its correlates among a sample of patients with acute psychosis, schizophrenia and healthy controls. Methods: Case control study conducted on 20 patients with acute psychosis, 40 patients with schizophrenia and 60 healthy control volunteers. Patients admitted at Okasha Institute of Psychiatry, Ain Shams University Hospitals, diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). Severity of symptoms assessed by the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, while volunteers were assessed by General health questionnaire. All groups were assessed by Reading the mind in the eyes test (RMET). Results: There was significant difference between patients with schizophrenia who scored worse at the RMET than patients with acute psychosis while both have TOM deficit in comparison with the control group. No significant correlation between age or gender in all the three groups and their TOM functioning. There was significant negative correlation between duration of illness of patients with schizophrenia and their TOM functioning. In patients with acute psychosis group, negative symptoms were negatively correlated with the TOM functioning, while in patients with schizophrenia group positive and negative symptoms were negatively correlated with their TOM functioning.","PeriodicalId":8294,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Psychiatry Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20471/may.2022.58.01.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Correspondence to: Reem Hassan El Ghamry, MD, MRCPych 8 Mugamaa El Ferdous, Nasr St., 11471 Cairo, Egypt Phone: + 20 100 660 31 84 E-mail: reemelghamry@hotmail.com Copyright © 2022 KBCSM, Zagreb e-mail: apr.kbcsm@gmail.com • www.http://apr.kbcsm.hr Abstract Background: The extant literature indicates that patients with acute psychosis or schizophrenia, as well as nonpsychotic first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia, all exhibit “Theory of Mind” (TOM) impairments. Objective: To assess TOM functioning and identify its correlates among a sample of patients with acute psychosis, schizophrenia and healthy controls. Methods: Case control study conducted on 20 patients with acute psychosis, 40 patients with schizophrenia and 60 healthy control volunteers. Patients admitted at Okasha Institute of Psychiatry, Ain Shams University Hospitals, diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). Severity of symptoms assessed by the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, while volunteers were assessed by General health questionnaire. All groups were assessed by Reading the mind in the eyes test (RMET). Results: There was significant difference between patients with schizophrenia who scored worse at the RMET than patients with acute psychosis while both have TOM deficit in comparison with the control group. No significant correlation between age or gender in all the three groups and their TOM functioning. There was significant negative correlation between duration of illness of patients with schizophrenia and their TOM functioning. In patients with acute psychosis group, negative symptoms were negatively correlated with the TOM functioning, while in patients with schizophrenia group positive and negative symptoms were negatively correlated with their TOM functioning.
用眼睛读心:急性精神病和精神分裂症的心理理论
通讯作者:Reem Hassan El Ghamry, MD, MRCPych 8 Mugamaa El Ferdous, Nasr St., 11471 Cairo, Egypt电话:+ 20 100 660 31 84 E-mail: reemelghamry@hotmail.com版权©2022 KBCSM, Zagreb E-mail: apr.kbcsm@gmail.com•网址:http://apr.kbcsm.hr摘要背景:现有文献表明,急性精神病或精神分裂症患者以及精神分裂症患者的非精神病一级亲属均表现出“心智理论”(TOM)障碍。目的:评价急性精神病患者、精神分裂症患者和健康对照者的TOM功能及其相关性。方法:对20例急性精神病患者、40例精神分裂症患者和60例健康对照进行病例对照研究。在艾因沙姆斯大学医院Okasha精神病学研究所接受诊断的患者使用DSM-IV轴I障碍(SCID-I)的结构化临床访谈。采用《阳性症状评估量表》和《阴性症状评估量表》评估症状严重程度,采用一般健康问卷对志愿者进行评估。所有组均通过眼睛读心测试(RMET)进行评估。结果:精神分裂症患者RMET得分低于急性精神病患者,且与对照组相比,两者均有TOM缺陷。三组患者的年龄、性别与TOM功能无显著相关性。精神分裂症患者病程与TOM功能呈显著负相关。急性精神病组阴性症状与TOM功能呈负相关,精神分裂症组阳性、阴性症状与TOM功能呈负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Psychiatry Research
Archives of Psychiatry Research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信