An Empirical Insight: Accountable Care Organizations’ Profitability and Quality Drivers

Andrey Mikhailitchenko, Hugh Pforsich
{"title":"An Empirical Insight: Accountable Care Organizations’ Profitability and Quality Drivers","authors":"Andrey Mikhailitchenko, Hugh Pforsich","doi":"10.5530/IJMEDPH.2020.4.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copyright © 2020 Phcog.Net. This is an openaccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Cite this article : Mikhailitchenko A, Pforsich H. An Empirical Insight: Accountable Care Organizations’ Profitability and Quality Drivers. Int J Med Public Health. 2020;10(4):155-9. ABSTRACT Since their inception in 2012, accountable care organizations (ACOs) have yielded inconsistent and unpredictable financial results. These outcomes may be related to an individual ACO’s participant mix of primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists. We analyzed ACO performance data to better understand the cooperative roles of PCPs and specialists in financially successful ACOs. The dataset included several variables reflecting different quantitative and qualitative characteristics of ACO performance. The analyses of variance and covariance (ANOVA and ANCOVA) were used as the primary statistical tool. The obtained results provided the evidence that a larger number of PCPs in an ACO can help to achieve quantitative goals related to immediate financial effect. In contrast, ACOs with a higher relative share of specialists tend to improve the healthcare quality and profitability in the longer term. The results provide a solid basis for further investigation that may help future ACOs to design the strategies resulting in efficient quality care and sustainable profitability.","PeriodicalId":90863,"journal":{"name":"International journal of medicine and public health","volume":"10 1","pages":"155-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of medicine and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/IJMEDPH.2020.4.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Copyright © 2020 Phcog.Net. This is an openaccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Cite this article : Mikhailitchenko A, Pforsich H. An Empirical Insight: Accountable Care Organizations’ Profitability and Quality Drivers. Int J Med Public Health. 2020;10(4):155-9. ABSTRACT Since their inception in 2012, accountable care organizations (ACOs) have yielded inconsistent and unpredictable financial results. These outcomes may be related to an individual ACO’s participant mix of primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists. We analyzed ACO performance data to better understand the cooperative roles of PCPs and specialists in financially successful ACOs. The dataset included several variables reflecting different quantitative and qualitative characteristics of ACO performance. The analyses of variance and covariance (ANOVA and ANCOVA) were used as the primary statistical tool. The obtained results provided the evidence that a larger number of PCPs in an ACO can help to achieve quantitative goals related to immediate financial effect. In contrast, ACOs with a higher relative share of specialists tend to improve the healthcare quality and profitability in the longer term. The results provide a solid basis for further investigation that may help future ACOs to design the strategies resulting in efficient quality care and sustainable profitability.
实证分析:责任护理组织的盈利能力和质量驱动因素
版权所有©2020 Phcog.Net这是一篇基于知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议的开放获取文章。引用本文:王晓明,王晓明。责任关怀组织盈利能力与质量驱动因素的实证分析。国际医学与公共卫生杂志,2020;10(4):155-9。自2012年成立以来,问责制医疗组织(ACOs)产生了不一致和不可预测的财务结果。这些结果可能与个体ACO的初级保健医生(pcp)和专家的参与者组合有关。为了更好地理解pcp和专家在财务上成功的ACOs中的合作角色,我们分析了ACOs的绩效数据。该数据集包含几个变量,反映了蚁群算法性能的不同定量和定性特征。采用方差和协方差分析(ANOVA和ANCOVA)作为主要统计工具。所获得的结果提供了证据,证明在ACO中大量的pcp可以帮助实现与直接财务效果相关的量化目标。相比之下,专科医生比例较高的ACOs往往能长期提高医疗质量和盈利能力。研究结果为进一步的研究提供了坚实的基础,可以帮助未来的ACOs设计策略,从而实现高效、优质的护理和可持续的盈利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信