Maternal microbis: How kinship composes reproductive relations for a human-bovine maternal microbiome

Rebecca Howes-Mischel, Megan Tracy
{"title":"Maternal microbis: How kinship composes reproductive relations for a human-bovine maternal microbiome","authors":"Rebecca Howes-Mischel,&nbsp;Megan Tracy","doi":"10.1002/fea2.12123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reading across a burgeoning scientific literature that conflates microbial dynamics between mother:child bodies with normative mothering practices, we offer a model of maternal microbis that troubles the distinctions between productive and reproductive relations. We ground this argument in a systematic analysis of the content and circulation of descriptive maternal microbiome research between 2007 and 2021 along with the proliferation of lay narratives about the maternal microbiome inspired by such research. Following this research across the species line between human and bovine bodies, we trace the gendered effects of using humans as model animals and tie current microbiome hype to a much longer history of entangling reproductive and productive labors. More than a microbial retread of a familiar story within a history of distributing reproductive labor to other bodies, our focus on the maternal microbis as a gendered model of microbial relations enables us to ask specific questions about the effects of centering microbes into models of reproductive bodies (both <i>Homo</i> and <i>Bos</i>), leading us to consider how expectations of gendered care and gendered bodies make certain paradigms possible and foreclose others.</p>","PeriodicalId":73022,"journal":{"name":"Feminist anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fea2.12123","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fea2.12123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reading across a burgeoning scientific literature that conflates microbial dynamics between mother:child bodies with normative mothering practices, we offer a model of maternal microbis that troubles the distinctions between productive and reproductive relations. We ground this argument in a systematic analysis of the content and circulation of descriptive maternal microbiome research between 2007 and 2021 along with the proliferation of lay narratives about the maternal microbiome inspired by such research. Following this research across the species line between human and bovine bodies, we trace the gendered effects of using humans as model animals and tie current microbiome hype to a much longer history of entangling reproductive and productive labors. More than a microbial retread of a familiar story within a history of distributing reproductive labor to other bodies, our focus on the maternal microbis as a gendered model of microbial relations enables us to ask specific questions about the effects of centering microbes into models of reproductive bodies (both Homo and Bos), leading us to consider how expectations of gendered care and gendered bodies make certain paradigms possible and foreclose others.

母系微生物:亲属关系如何构成人牛母系微生物群的生殖关系
阅读新兴的科学文献,将母亲:孩子身体之间的微生物动力学与规范的育儿实践相结合,我们提供了一个母体微生物模型,它困扰着生产关系和生殖关系之间的区别。我们基于对2007年至2021年间描述性母体微生物组研究的内容和循环的系统分析,以及受此类研究启发的关于母体微生物组的外行叙述的激增,得出了这一论点。在这项跨越人类和牛之间物种界限的研究中,我们追踪了将人类作为模型动物的性别效应,并将当前微生物组的炒作与更长的繁殖和生产劳动纠缠的历史联系起来。在将生殖劳动分配给其他身体的历史中,我们不仅仅是对一个熟悉的故事进行微生物改造,我们对母系微生物作为微生物关系的性别模型的关注使我们能够提出有关将微生物集中到生殖体模型(包括人属和人属)中的影响的具体问题,从而使我们考虑性别关怀和性别身体的期望如何使某些范式成为可能并排除其他范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信