Rules, Paper, Status: Migrants and Precarious Bureaucracy in Contemporary Italy

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
E. D. Graauw
{"title":"Rules, Paper, Status: Migrants and Precarious Bureaucracy in Contemporary Italy","authors":"E. D. Graauw","doi":"10.1177/00943061231181317jj","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This important and insightful book documents migrants’ everyday encounters with Italy’s ‘‘documentation regime,’’ a bewildering government bureaucracy lacking transparency, accountability, and consistency that migrants must navigate to secure and maintain legal status, bring family members into the country, and attain Italian citizenship. Drawing on in-depth ethnographic fieldwork conducted between 2009 and 2016 in a city in the northern EmiliaRomagna region, Rules, Paper, Status: Migrants and Precarious Bureaucracy in Contemporary Italy follows migrants, their nongovernmental advisors, and public officials who implement and bend the rules interpreting Italy’s exclusionary yet flexible immigration laws that regulate the lives of migrants residing in Italy. Anna Tuckett vividly describes how Italy’s frequently changing immigration laws and their inconsistent implementation produce anxiety, insecurity, and tensions for migrants, who experience continued social marginalization even if they are long-term, culturally integrated residents. Yet she also highlights how migrants with knowledge of Italian immigration laws can become brokers and advisors to other migrants, in the process building social and economic capital while ensuring that Italy’s migration bureaucracy does not succumb to its own irrationality. The book is clearly structured and has eight chapters. The Introduction discusses the increased bureaucratization of migration flows and provides an overview of migrants in Italy and Italian immigration laws, which are simultaneously harsh and lenient. Chapter One introduces the book’s central fieldwork site: a migrant advice center affiliated with a labor union that helps migrants with filling out forms and offers advice on navigating Italy’s precarious immigration bureaucracy. Chapters Two and Three explore how first-generation migrants manipulate and successfully navigate this bureaucracy using both informal and extralegal rule-bending, practices that can put migrants in danger of losing legal status or prevent them from obtaining Italian citizenship. Chapter Four focuses on community brokers, migrants who use their knowledge of Italian immigration laws and cultural dexterity to help others while improving their own community standing and socioeconomic mobility. While Chapter Five considers how encounters with Italy’s immigration bureaucracy create upset and disjuncture for 1.5and second-generation migrants, Chapter Six discusses how uncertain legal status, discrimination, and lack of social mobility cause many migrants to feel disappointment and personal failure and to view Italy as a stepping stone to a better destination elsewhere in Europe. The Conclusion contextualizes the book’s findings within broader processes of contemporary migration and globalization and points out the political utilities—to different public and private actors—of the Italian immigration system’s contradictions. One of the book’s strengths lies in its contributions to the literature on the immigration bureaucracy. In contrast to much of the existing scholarship on how migrants engage with nation-state borders and their regulatory structures, this book zooms in on how migrants engage with the ‘‘documentation regime’’ that regulates their lives while living within Italy’s nation-state boundaries. The book illustrates well how ‘‘legal’’ and ‘‘illegal’’ are not statuses created by migrants’ practices of crossing borders with or without papers; rather, they result from confusing and rapidly changing legal and bureaucratic Reviews 383","PeriodicalId":46889,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","volume":"52 1","pages":"383 - 384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00943061231181317jj","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This important and insightful book documents migrants’ everyday encounters with Italy’s ‘‘documentation regime,’’ a bewildering government bureaucracy lacking transparency, accountability, and consistency that migrants must navigate to secure and maintain legal status, bring family members into the country, and attain Italian citizenship. Drawing on in-depth ethnographic fieldwork conducted between 2009 and 2016 in a city in the northern EmiliaRomagna region, Rules, Paper, Status: Migrants and Precarious Bureaucracy in Contemporary Italy follows migrants, their nongovernmental advisors, and public officials who implement and bend the rules interpreting Italy’s exclusionary yet flexible immigration laws that regulate the lives of migrants residing in Italy. Anna Tuckett vividly describes how Italy’s frequently changing immigration laws and their inconsistent implementation produce anxiety, insecurity, and tensions for migrants, who experience continued social marginalization even if they are long-term, culturally integrated residents. Yet she also highlights how migrants with knowledge of Italian immigration laws can become brokers and advisors to other migrants, in the process building social and economic capital while ensuring that Italy’s migration bureaucracy does not succumb to its own irrationality. The book is clearly structured and has eight chapters. The Introduction discusses the increased bureaucratization of migration flows and provides an overview of migrants in Italy and Italian immigration laws, which are simultaneously harsh and lenient. Chapter One introduces the book’s central fieldwork site: a migrant advice center affiliated with a labor union that helps migrants with filling out forms and offers advice on navigating Italy’s precarious immigration bureaucracy. Chapters Two and Three explore how first-generation migrants manipulate and successfully navigate this bureaucracy using both informal and extralegal rule-bending, practices that can put migrants in danger of losing legal status or prevent them from obtaining Italian citizenship. Chapter Four focuses on community brokers, migrants who use their knowledge of Italian immigration laws and cultural dexterity to help others while improving their own community standing and socioeconomic mobility. While Chapter Five considers how encounters with Italy’s immigration bureaucracy create upset and disjuncture for 1.5and second-generation migrants, Chapter Six discusses how uncertain legal status, discrimination, and lack of social mobility cause many migrants to feel disappointment and personal failure and to view Italy as a stepping stone to a better destination elsewhere in Europe. The Conclusion contextualizes the book’s findings within broader processes of contemporary migration and globalization and points out the political utilities—to different public and private actors—of the Italian immigration system’s contradictions. One of the book’s strengths lies in its contributions to the literature on the immigration bureaucracy. In contrast to much of the existing scholarship on how migrants engage with nation-state borders and their regulatory structures, this book zooms in on how migrants engage with the ‘‘documentation regime’’ that regulates their lives while living within Italy’s nation-state boundaries. The book illustrates well how ‘‘legal’’ and ‘‘illegal’’ are not statuses created by migrants’ practices of crossing borders with or without papers; rather, they result from confusing and rapidly changing legal and bureaucratic Reviews 383
规则、文件、地位:当代意大利的移民和不稳定的官僚主义
这本重要而富有洞察力的书记录了移民与意大利“文件制度”的日常接触,这是一个令人困惑的政府官僚机构,缺乏透明度、问责制和一致性,移民必须通过这本书来确保和维持合法身份,将家庭成员带到意大利,并获得意大利公民身份。根据2009年至2016年在艾米利亚-罗马涅地区北部一座城市进行的深入民族志实地调查,《规则,论文,现状:当代意大利的移民和不稳定的官僚制度》关注移民,他们的非政府顾问,以及执行和改变解释意大利排斥性但灵活的移民法的规则的公职人员,这些移民法规范了居住在意大利的移民的生活。Anna Tuckett生动地描述了意大利频繁变化的移民法及其不一致的实施如何给移民带来焦虑、不安全和紧张,即使他们是长期的、文化融合的居民,他们也会经历持续的社会边缘化。然而,她也强调了了解意大利移民法的移民如何成为其他移民的经纪人和顾问,在建立社会和经济资本的过程中,确保意大利的移民官僚机构不会屈服于自身的非理性。这本书结构清晰,共有八章。导言讨论了移民流动日益官僚化的问题,并概述了意大利的移民和意大利的移民法,这些法律既严厉又宽松。第一章介绍了这本书的中心实地考察网站:一个隶属于工会的移民咨询中心,帮助移民填写表格,并为应对意大利岌岌可危的移民官僚机构提供建议。第二章和第三章探讨了第一代移民如何利用非正式和法外规则弯曲来操纵和成功驾驭这种官僚机构,这种做法可能会使移民面临失去法律地位或阻止他们获得意大利公民身份的危险。第四章重点关注社区经纪人,即利用他们对意大利移民法的了解和文化灵活性帮助他人,同时提高自己的社区地位和社会经济流动性的移民。虽然第五章考虑了与意大利移民官僚机构的遭遇如何给1.5代和第二代移民带来不安和脱节,但第六章讨论了不确定的法律地位、歧视和缺乏社会流动性如何导致许多移民感到失望和个人失败,并将意大利视为通往欧洲其他地方更好目的地的垫脚石。结论将本书的发现置于当代移民和全球化的更广泛过程中,并指出了意大利移民制度矛盾对不同公共和私人行为者的政治效用。这本书的优势之一在于它对移民官僚机构的文献做出了贡献。与现有关于移民如何参与民族国家边界及其监管结构的许多学术研究不同,本书聚焦于移民如何参与“文件制度”,该制度在意大利民族国家边界内生活时监管他们的生活。这本书很好地说明了“合法”和“非法”不是移民有证件或无证件越境行为所创造的身份;相反,它们是由混乱和快速变化的法律和官僚审查造成的383
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信