Unearthing the myths of global sustainable forest governance

IF 4.6 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
I. Delabre, E. Boyd, M. Brockhaus, Wim Carton, T. Krause, P. Newell, G. Wong, F. Zelli
{"title":"Unearthing the myths of global sustainable forest governance","authors":"I. Delabre, E. Boyd, M. Brockhaus, Wim Carton, T. Krause, P. Newell, G. Wong, F. Zelli","doi":"10.1017/sus.2020.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-technical summary Despite efforts to address the global forest crisis, deforestation and degradation continue, so we need to urgently revisit possible solutions. A failure to halt the global forest crisis contributes to climate change and biodiversity loss and will continue to result in inequalities in access to, and benefits from, forest resources. In this paper, we unpack a series of powerful myths about forests and their management. By exposing and better understanding these myths and what makes them so persistent, we have the basis to make the social and political changes needed to better manage and protect forests globally. Technical summary There is increasing recognition in the scientific community that environmental problems such as climate change are not just technological or engineering problems, but part of an ideational crisis. One particularly dominant idea is that sustainability problems can be solved by treating them as predominantly economic problems to be solved by market-based instruments or by mobilizing enough financial resources. In this article, we suggest that ideas like these are not only challenged by available scientific evidence about the best way to tackle the global forest crisis, but also produce socio-institutional lock-ins. We examine various myths underlying these lock-ins and show how they create barriers to transformations towards global forest sustainability. In the context of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, we ask why we are stuck with seemingly ineffective and inequitable approaches to global forest governance. We examine deforestation and some of the currently discussed policy solutions such as carbon forestry, Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) and private forest governance. We aim to unearth these myths and explore their consequences, warning that, in many contexts, their prevalence may preclude other solutions that might be more effective. Finally, we consider the transformative changes that are needed to unlock these lock-ins through a combination of ‘counteractions’ for sustainable forest governance. Social media summary Myths about the global forest crisis need to be disrupted to sustainably govern and protect forests globally.","PeriodicalId":36849,"journal":{"name":"Global Sustainability","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/sus.2020.11","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Non-technical summary Despite efforts to address the global forest crisis, deforestation and degradation continue, so we need to urgently revisit possible solutions. A failure to halt the global forest crisis contributes to climate change and biodiversity loss and will continue to result in inequalities in access to, and benefits from, forest resources. In this paper, we unpack a series of powerful myths about forests and their management. By exposing and better understanding these myths and what makes them so persistent, we have the basis to make the social and political changes needed to better manage and protect forests globally. Technical summary There is increasing recognition in the scientific community that environmental problems such as climate change are not just technological or engineering problems, but part of an ideational crisis. One particularly dominant idea is that sustainability problems can be solved by treating them as predominantly economic problems to be solved by market-based instruments or by mobilizing enough financial resources. In this article, we suggest that ideas like these are not only challenged by available scientific evidence about the best way to tackle the global forest crisis, but also produce socio-institutional lock-ins. We examine various myths underlying these lock-ins and show how they create barriers to transformations towards global forest sustainability. In the context of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, we ask why we are stuck with seemingly ineffective and inequitable approaches to global forest governance. We examine deforestation and some of the currently discussed policy solutions such as carbon forestry, Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) and private forest governance. We aim to unearth these myths and explore their consequences, warning that, in many contexts, their prevalence may preclude other solutions that might be more effective. Finally, we consider the transformative changes that are needed to unlock these lock-ins through a combination of ‘counteractions’ for sustainable forest governance. Social media summary Myths about the global forest crisis need to be disrupted to sustainably govern and protect forests globally.
揭开全球可持续森林治理的神话
非技术性摘要尽管努力解决全球森林危机,但森林砍伐和退化仍在继续,因此我们需要紧急重新审视可能的解决方案。未能制止全球森林危机会导致气候变化和生物多样性丧失,并将继续导致在获得森林资源和从中受益方面的不平等。在这篇论文中,我们解开了一系列关于森林及其管理的强大神话。通过揭露和更好地理解这些神话,以及是什么让它们如此持久,我们有基础进行必要的社会和政治变革,以更好地管理和保护全球森林。技术摘要科学界越来越认识到,气候变化等环境问题不仅仅是技术或工程问题,而是思想危机的一部分。一个特别重要的观点是,可持续性问题可以通过将其视为主要的经济问题来解决,这些问题可以通过基于市场的工具或调动足够的财政资源来解决。在这篇文章中,我们建议,像这样的想法不仅受到关于应对全球森林危机最佳方法的现有科学证据的挑战,而且还会产生社会制度锁定。我们研究了这些锁定背后的各种神话,并展示了它们如何为实现全球森林可持续性的转型制造障碍。在联合国可持续发展目标的背景下,我们问为什么我们在全球森林治理方面坚持看似无效和不公平的方法。我们研究了森林砍伐和目前讨论的一些政策解决方案,如碳林业、减少森林砍伐和退化的排放(REDD+)以及私人森林治理。我们的目标是挖掘这些神话并探索其后果,并警告说,在许多情况下,它们的流行可能会阻碍其他可能更有效的解决方案。最后,我们考虑了通过对可持续森林治理的“反作用”组合来解锁这些锁定所需的变革。社交媒体摘要关于全球森林危机的神话需要被打破,以可持续地治理和保护全球森林。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Sustainability
Global Sustainability Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
19
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信