Optimized Negative Selection Algorithm for Image Classification in Multimodal Biometric System

IF 0.8 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
M. Balogun, Latifat Adeola Odeniyi, Elijah Olusola Omidiora, S. Olabiyisi, A. Falohun
{"title":"Optimized Negative Selection Algorithm for Image Classification in Multimodal Biometric System","authors":"M. Balogun, Latifat Adeola Odeniyi, Elijah Olusola Omidiora, S. Olabiyisi, A. Falohun","doi":"10.18267/j.aip.186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classification is a crucial stage in identification systems, most specifically in biometric identification systems. A weak and inaccurate classification system may produce false identity, which in turn impacts negatively on delicate decisions. Decision making in biometric systems is done at the classification stage. Due to the importance of this stage, many classifiers have been developed and modified by researchers. However, most of the existing classifiers are limited in accuracy due to false representation of image features, improper training of classifier models for newly emerging data (over-fitting or under-fitting problem) and lack of an efficient mode of generating model parameters (scalability problem). The Negative Selection Algorithm (NSA) is one of the major algorithms of the Artificial Immune System, inspired by the operation of the mammalian immune system for solving classification problems. However, it is still prone to the inability to consider the whole self-space during the detectors/features generation process. Hence, this work developed an Optimized Negative Selection Algorithm (ONSA) for image classification in biometric systems. The ONSA is characterized by the ability to consider whole feature spaces (feature selection balance), having good training capability and low scalability problems. The performance of the ONSA was compared with that of the standard NSA (SNSA), and it was discovered that the ONSA has greater recognition accuracy by producing 98.33% accuracy compared with that of the SNSA which is 96.33%. The ONSA produced TP and TN values of 146% and 149%, respectively, while the SNSA produced 143% and 146% for TP and TN, respectively. Also, the ONSA generated a lower FN and FP rate of 4.00% and 1.00%, respectively, compared to the SNSA, which generated FN and FP values of 7.00% and 4.00%, respectively. Therefore, it was discovered in this work that global feature selection improves recognition accuracy in biometric systems. The developed biometric system can be adapted by any organization that requires an ultra-secure identification system. O.S.O.:","PeriodicalId":36592,"journal":{"name":"Acta Informatica Pragensia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Informatica Pragensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aip.186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Classification is a crucial stage in identification systems, most specifically in biometric identification systems. A weak and inaccurate classification system may produce false identity, which in turn impacts negatively on delicate decisions. Decision making in biometric systems is done at the classification stage. Due to the importance of this stage, many classifiers have been developed and modified by researchers. However, most of the existing classifiers are limited in accuracy due to false representation of image features, improper training of classifier models for newly emerging data (over-fitting or under-fitting problem) and lack of an efficient mode of generating model parameters (scalability problem). The Negative Selection Algorithm (NSA) is one of the major algorithms of the Artificial Immune System, inspired by the operation of the mammalian immune system for solving classification problems. However, it is still prone to the inability to consider the whole self-space during the detectors/features generation process. Hence, this work developed an Optimized Negative Selection Algorithm (ONSA) for image classification in biometric systems. The ONSA is characterized by the ability to consider whole feature spaces (feature selection balance), having good training capability and low scalability problems. The performance of the ONSA was compared with that of the standard NSA (SNSA), and it was discovered that the ONSA has greater recognition accuracy by producing 98.33% accuracy compared with that of the SNSA which is 96.33%. The ONSA produced TP and TN values of 146% and 149%, respectively, while the SNSA produced 143% and 146% for TP and TN, respectively. Also, the ONSA generated a lower FN and FP rate of 4.00% and 1.00%, respectively, compared to the SNSA, which generated FN and FP values of 7.00% and 4.00%, respectively. Therefore, it was discovered in this work that global feature selection improves recognition accuracy in biometric systems. The developed biometric system can be adapted by any organization that requires an ultra-secure identification system. O.S.O.:
多模式生物识别系统中图像分类的优化负选择算法
分类是识别系统中的一个关键阶段,尤其是在生物识别系统中。一个薄弱和不准确的分类系统可能会产生虚假的身份,从而对微妙的决策产生负面影响。生物识别系统的决策是在分类阶段完成的。由于这一阶段的重要性,研究人员开发和修改了许多分类器。然而,由于图像特征的错误表示、对新出现的数据的分类器模型的不当训练(过拟合或欠拟合问题)以及缺乏生成模型参数的有效模式(可伸缩性问题),大多数现有分类器的准确性受到限制。负选择算法(NSA)是人工免疫系统的主要算法之一,其灵感来源于哺乳动物免疫系统解决分类问题的操作。然而,在检测器/特征生成过程中,仍然容易无法考虑整个自空间。因此,本工作开发了一种用于生物识别系统中图像分类的优化负选择算法(ONSA)。ONSA的特点是能够考虑整个特征空间(特征选择平衡),具有良好的训练能力和较低的可扩展性问题。将ONSA与标准NSA(SNSA)的性能进行了比较,发现ONSA的识别准确率为98.33%,而标准NSA的识别准确度为96.33%。此外,与分别产生7.00%和4.00%的FN和FP值的SNSA相比,ONSA分别产生4.00%和1.00%的较低FN和FP率。因此,在这项工作中发现,全局特征选择提高了生物识别系统的识别精度。所开发的生物识别系统可以由任何需要超安全身份识别系统的组织进行调整。O.S.O.:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Informatica Pragensia
Acta Informatica Pragensia Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信