Reframing Regulation: ‘Privatisation’, De-democratisation and the End of Social Protection?

S. Tombs
{"title":"Reframing Regulation: ‘Privatisation’, De-democratisation and the End of Social Protection?","authors":"S. Tombs","doi":"10.4000/RFCB.7826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers how the re-framing of regulation, in ways that have allowed an inter-penetration of private sector mentalities and actors with state regulators, have combined in the UK to produce both a de-democratisation and the erosion of social protection. It does so through an exploration of the enforcement of law designed to regulate business. In particular, I examine enforcement and regulatory policy at Local Authority level under the guise of the Better Regulation initiative and, then, conditions of austerity. These contexts have produced the opportunities for reframed – that is, specifically, marketised – forms of regulation which prioritise the interests of business over social protection. The paper also argues that they have been crucial in producing conditions whereby the fire at Grenfell Tower must be partly understood – conditions of de-democratisation and the decline of social protection.","PeriodicalId":31365,"journal":{"name":"Revue Francaise de Civilisation Britannique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue Francaise de Civilisation Britannique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/RFCB.7826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper considers how the re-framing of regulation, in ways that have allowed an inter-penetration of private sector mentalities and actors with state regulators, have combined in the UK to produce both a de-democratisation and the erosion of social protection. It does so through an exploration of the enforcement of law designed to regulate business. In particular, I examine enforcement and regulatory policy at Local Authority level under the guise of the Better Regulation initiative and, then, conditions of austerity. These contexts have produced the opportunities for reframed – that is, specifically, marketised – forms of regulation which prioritise the interests of business over social protection. The paper also argues that they have been crucial in producing conditions whereby the fire at Grenfell Tower must be partly understood – conditions of de-democratisation and the decline of social protection.
重塑监管:“私有化”、去民主化和社会保护的终结?
本文考虑了监管的重新框架,以允许私营部门心态和行为者与国家监管机构相互渗透的方式,在英国结合起来,产生了去民主化和社会保护的侵蚀。它通过探索旨在规范商业的法律的执行情况来实现这一目标。特别是,我在“更好的监管”倡议和紧缩条件的幌子下,研究了地方政府层面的执法和监管政策。这些背景为重新构建(具体而言,就是市场化)监管形式创造了机会,这些形式将企业利益置于社会保护之上。这篇论文还认为,它们在产生必须部分理解格伦费尔大厦火灾的条件——去民主化和社会保障下降的条件——方面发挥了至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书