{"title":"Réseaux épistolaires et amitiés infra-politiques entre Révolution et Restauration","authors":"Karine Rance","doi":"10.1215/00161071-8810364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Le comte de Montlosier a laissé 386 lettres adressées à Claude-Ignace de Barante et à son fils Prosper entre son retour d’émigration en 1801 et sa mort en 1838. Cette correspondance, qui excède la communication épistolaire duelle pour étendre ses ramifications jusqu’à Coppet, Rome, Londres et Berlin, est pour l’épistolier un instrument d'intégration dans la France postrévolutionnaire, et pour l'historien un observatoire privilégié des mécanismes à l’œuvre dans ce processus. Les réseaux amicaux épistolaires tissés créent des espaces de communication hybrides, mêlant intimité, promotion sociale, et information. Entre Ancien Régime et modernité postrévolutionnaire, les lettres sont ainsi destinées à lutter contre la fragmentation du temps.\n The Comte de Montlosier left 386 letters addressed to Claude-Ignace de Barante and his son Prosper between his return from emigration in 1801 and his death in 1838. The two-way exchange extended Montlosier's networks in multiple directions—to Coppet, Rome, London, and Berlin—and it became for its author an instrument of integration into postrevolutionary France. For the historian it is a vantage point from which to observe the mechanisms at work in the transition from Revolution to Restoration. These networks created spaces of hybrid communication mixing intimacy, social promotion, and news. Between Old Regime and postrevolutionary modernity, Montlosier's letters fought against the fragmentation of time.","PeriodicalId":45311,"journal":{"name":"FRENCH HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FRENCH HISTORICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00161071-8810364","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Le comte de Montlosier a laissé 386 lettres adressées à Claude-Ignace de Barante et à son fils Prosper entre son retour d’émigration en 1801 et sa mort en 1838. Cette correspondance, qui excède la communication épistolaire duelle pour étendre ses ramifications jusqu’à Coppet, Rome, Londres et Berlin, est pour l’épistolier un instrument d'intégration dans la France postrévolutionnaire, et pour l'historien un observatoire privilégié des mécanismes à l’œuvre dans ce processus. Les réseaux amicaux épistolaires tissés créent des espaces de communication hybrides, mêlant intimité, promotion sociale, et information. Entre Ancien Régime et modernité postrévolutionnaire, les lettres sont ainsi destinées à lutter contre la fragmentation du temps.
The Comte de Montlosier left 386 letters addressed to Claude-Ignace de Barante and his son Prosper between his return from emigration in 1801 and his death in 1838. The two-way exchange extended Montlosier's networks in multiple directions—to Coppet, Rome, London, and Berlin—and it became for its author an instrument of integration into postrevolutionary France. For the historian it is a vantage point from which to observe the mechanisms at work in the transition from Revolution to Restoration. These networks created spaces of hybrid communication mixing intimacy, social promotion, and news. Between Old Regime and postrevolutionary modernity, Montlosier's letters fought against the fragmentation of time.
期刊介绍:
French Historical Studies, the leading journal on the history of France, publishes articles, commentaries, and research notes on all periods of French history from the Middle Ages to the present. The journal’s diverse format includes forums, review essays, special issues, and articles in French, as well as bilingual abstracts of the articles in each issue. Also featured are bibliographies of recent articles, dissertations and books in French history, and announcements of fellowships, prizes, and conferences of interest to French historians.