Frequency and Severity of Tree and Other Fixed Object Crashes in Florida, 2006—2013

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Jeffery W. Van Treese II, Andrew K. Koeser, George F. Fitzpatrick, Michael T. Olexa, Ethan J. Allen
{"title":"Frequency and Severity of Tree and Other Fixed Object Crashes in Florida, 2006—2013","authors":"Jeffery W. Van Treese II, Andrew K. Koeser, George F. Fitzpatrick, Michael T. Olexa, Ethan J. Allen","doi":"10.48044/jauf.2019.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Roadside trees provide benefits to drivers such as traffic calming, roadway definition, and driver stress reduction. However, trees are also one of several roadway infrastructure elements commonly involved in single-vehicle crashes. In this study, Florida Highway Saftey and Motor Vehicle records were analyzed to: evaluate the relative frequency of tree-related crashes compared to other fixed-object crashes; assess the impact of roadway-, vehicle-, and driver-related factors on tree crash frequency; and compare the severity of tree crashes relative to other single-vehicle crashes. In accessing 3,033,041 crash records from 2006 to 2013 (all complete years), we identified 565,303 single-vehicle accidents (10.5%) and 47,341 tree-related accidents (1.6%). Trees were the fourth most common fixed object hit in urban single-vehicle accidents and the second most common fixed object hit in rural single-vehicle accidents. Driver gender, vehicle type, light conditions, weather conditions, and land use all were correlated with the frequency. Additionally, the injuries associated with tree crashes were more severe than all other single-vehicle crash types except vehicle rollovers.","PeriodicalId":39043,"journal":{"name":"Arboriculture and Urban Forestry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arboriculture and Urban Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2019.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Roadside trees provide benefits to drivers such as traffic calming, roadway definition, and driver stress reduction. However, trees are also one of several roadway infrastructure elements commonly involved in single-vehicle crashes. In this study, Florida Highway Saftey and Motor Vehicle records were analyzed to: evaluate the relative frequency of tree-related crashes compared to other fixed-object crashes; assess the impact of roadway-, vehicle-, and driver-related factors on tree crash frequency; and compare the severity of tree crashes relative to other single-vehicle crashes. In accessing 3,033,041 crash records from 2006 to 2013 (all complete years), we identified 565,303 single-vehicle accidents (10.5%) and 47,341 tree-related accidents (1.6%). Trees were the fourth most common fixed object hit in urban single-vehicle accidents and the second most common fixed object hit in rural single-vehicle accidents. Driver gender, vehicle type, light conditions, weather conditions, and land use all were correlated with the frequency. Additionally, the injuries associated with tree crashes were more severe than all other single-vehicle crash types except vehicle rollovers.
2006-2013年佛罗里达州树木和其他固定物体碰撞的频率和严重程度
路边的树木对司机有好处,如使交通平静,道路清晰,减轻司机的压力。然而,树木也是导致单车撞车事故的几种常见道路基础设施之一。在这项研究中,分析了佛罗里达州公路安全和机动车辆记录,以评估与树木有关的碰撞与其他固定物体碰撞的相对频率;评估道路、车辆和驾驶员相关因素对树木碰撞频率的影响;并将树木碰撞的严重程度与其他单一车辆碰撞进行比较。在访问2006年至2013年(所有完整年份)的3,033,041起事故记录时,我们确定了565,303起单车事故(10.5%)和47,341起与树木有关的事故(1.6%)。树木是城市单车事故中第四大最常见的固定物体,是农村单车事故中第二大最常见的固定物体。驾驶员性别、车辆类型、光照条件、天气条件和土地利用都与频率相关。此外,与树木碰撞相关的伤害比所有其他单一车辆碰撞类型更严重,除了车辆侧翻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arboriculture and Urban Forestry
Arboriculture and Urban Forestry Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信