Is viewing a painting like reading a story?: Trans-symbolic comprehension processes and aesthetic responses across two media

IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Christian C. Steciuch, Keith K. Millis, Ryan D. Kopatich
{"title":"Is viewing a painting like reading a story?: Trans-symbolic comprehension processes and aesthetic responses across two media","authors":"Christian C. Steciuch, Keith K. Millis, Ryan D. Kopatich","doi":"10.1080/0163853X.2023.2172299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A large body of research has outlined how mental models are formed by comprehending texts, yet relatively less work has been conducted in the field of comprehending artworks. Trans-symbolic comprehension (TSC) processes have been theorized to partially account for how mental models are formed across media. The current study tested whether participants use these processes similarly across reading stories and viewing paintings. The current study also tested whether the frequencies of TSC processes predict the aesthetic responses of understanding, interest, and pleasure. Participants typed out their thoughts while viewing paintings and reading texts. The think-aloud protocols were then parsed and coded for TSC processes. Results indicated similarities in TSC processes across both texts and paintings; however, the association between the TSC processes and aesthetic responses were greater for the texts than for the paintings. Overall, the results provide support for the TSC framework.","PeriodicalId":11316,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Processes","volume":"60 1","pages":"97 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Processes","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2023.2172299","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT A large body of research has outlined how mental models are formed by comprehending texts, yet relatively less work has been conducted in the field of comprehending artworks. Trans-symbolic comprehension (TSC) processes have been theorized to partially account for how mental models are formed across media. The current study tested whether participants use these processes similarly across reading stories and viewing paintings. The current study also tested whether the frequencies of TSC processes predict the aesthetic responses of understanding, interest, and pleasure. Participants typed out their thoughts while viewing paintings and reading texts. The think-aloud protocols were then parsed and coded for TSC processes. Results indicated similarities in TSC processes across both texts and paintings; however, the association between the TSC processes and aesthetic responses were greater for the texts than for the paintings. Overall, the results provide support for the TSC framework.
看一幅画就像读一个故事吗?跨媒介的跨符号理解过程与审美反应
摘要大量的研究已经概述了如何通过理解文本来形成心理模型,但在理解艺术品领域进行的工作相对较少。跨符号理解(TSC)过程已被理论化,部分解释了心理模型是如何在媒体上形成的。目前的研究测试了参与者在阅读故事和观看绘画时是否类似地使用这些过程。目前的研究还测试了TSC过程的频率是否可以预测理解、兴趣和愉悦的审美反应。参与者在观看绘画和阅读文本时,把自己的想法打出来。然后,为TSC进程解析并编码了“大声思考”协议。结果表明,文本和绘画的TSC过程相似;然而,文本的TSC过程和美学反应之间的联系大于绘画。总体而言,结果为TSC框架提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Discourse Processes is a multidisciplinary journal providing a forum for cross-fertilization of ideas from diverse disciplines sharing a common interest in discourse--prose comprehension and recall, dialogue analysis, text grammar construction, computer simulation of natural language, cross-cultural comparisons of communicative competence, or related topics. The problems posed by multisentence contexts and the methods required to investigate them, although not always unique to discourse, are sufficiently distinct so as to require an organized mode of scientific interaction made possible through the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信